Madhya Pradesh Court May 1956 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohammad HussaIn Vs. Provident Fund Inspector
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-11-1956
Reported in: 1957CriLJ195
Newaskar, J.1. Facts giving rise to the present petition of revision are as follows:The Provident Fund Inspector for Madhya Bharat lodged three different complaints against the petitioners Mohammad Hussain and Akbarali bearing numbers 413, 414 and 415 of 1954. The first two were in respect of offences under Section 14 of the Employee's Provident Funds Act 1952 and Clause 76 of the scheme framed thereunder and third was under Section 406 I.P.C. All these cases were consolidated by an order dated 14-1-1955. On 27-11-1954, the Provident Fund Inspector had moved the Court for an order directing the accused to produce certain Registers and Account-books of the Nazarali Mills. This application was allowed and an intimation of this was given to the learned Counsel for the accused about the order.On 30-4-1955 the accused Mohammad Hussain applied stating that he received the intimation of the order pertaining to production of registers and account books through his counsel late and did not know...
State Vs. Hamidkhan
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-04-1956
Reported in: 1956CriLJ1326
Samvatsar, J.1. This Is an appeal filed by the State of Madhya Bharat against an order of the Additional District Magistrate, Mandsaur by which he acquitted the respondent Hamidkhan.2. The facts of the case are that the accused-respondent Hamidkhan, who is alleged to be a Pakistani national, came to India under a passport No. 252641 dated 3-1-55 and 'C category Visa No. 15705 dated 17-3-55. As per conditions of the Visa he was to leave India before 16-6-1955. It is alleged that on 10th June, 1955, he made a report at the Mandsaur police station that he was leaving India but did not act accordingly. On 14-9-1955, he was found at Mandsaur and was therefore arrested and put up for trial under Section 3 of the Indian Passport Act read with Rules 5 and 6 made thereunder.3. The accused-respondent admitted overstaying but the learned Magistrate acquitted him holding that by overstaying in India after the period of the passport had expired, no offence was committed by the accused. It is agains...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›