Madhya Pradesh Court April 1954 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dewji Moti Bhil and anr. Vs. the State
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-27-1954
Reported in: 1955CriLJ284
Samvatsar, J.1. This is an appeal by two persons (1) Deoji son of Moti and his son (2) Gobriya s/o Deoji both of whom have been convicted on the charge of murdering one Nurjia, on 14-1-1952 and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Re. 1/- only.2. The facts of the prosecution case are as follows: About a week before the date of occurrence, the deceased Nurjia and his friends beat one Mathuri, the wife of appellant No. 1 and the mother of appellant No. 2. This, it is alleged, created bad blood between the deceased and the appellants and constituted a motive for the crime. On 14-1-1952 the appellants and certain other persons including the deceased Nurjia had been to Zaknawada to make their weekly purchases. There all of them drank liquor before they returned in the evening. The appellants started ahead accompanied by one Kodriya and it is alleged that in the way they concealed themselves behind a temple of Shri Hanuman & lay in wait for Nurjia to arrive...
Prabha Sharma Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-21-1954
Reported in: 1955CriLJ276
Dixit, J.(1) In this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner Prabha Sharma states that she was born on 10-9-1935 that after the death of her mother, when her father contracted a second marriage, her maternal uncle Prem Narain Kanongo brought her to Dewas and reared her up; that Prem Narain wanted her to marry a relation of his wife, whom she did not like; that, therefore, she asked one Moolchand With whom she was deeply in love to take her away from her uncle's residence and to marry her immediately; that accordingly after informing the police at Dewas she left Dewas with Moolchand on 9-2-1954 and arrived at Gwalior, where she was married to Moolchand on 10-2-1954 according to Vedic rites; that she gave information of the marriage to her father, her uncle Prem Narain and to the Additional District Magistrate of Dewas; that after the solemnisation of this marriage one Ram Narain Kanoongo, Inspector, Civil Supplies, Shajapur, who is not well disposed tow...
Dursingh Ghusla Bhilala Vs. State of Madhya Bharat
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-20-1954
Reported in: 1955CriLJ279
Nevaskar, J.1. Accused Dursingh was prosecuted for an offeiiee under Section 302, IPC before the Sessions Judge, Ratlam who found him guilty under that section and sentenced him to transportation for life. Aggrieved by this decision, accused has preferred this appeal.2. Prosecution case is that on 4-6-1952 a she-goat belonging to the accused was found missing. He thereupon set out in search of the same. He had with him a bow and arrows. He reached a place known as Guard Khodari. There he met deceased Bapu along with his two daughters, Bhimabai aged 12 and Basani younger than her. Bapu, it is said had gone that side in search of his own bullock which had strayed. Some talk took place between the accused and the deceased Bnri thereupon Beouned dischfireed about 5 to 7 arrows in succession against Bapu. He was seriously injured. In all. seven injuries were caused to the abdominal cavity and forearm, those on the abdominal cavity being serious. He was taken nome by his brother Gambhira and...
Babulalji Saksena (Vijay Sankar) and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Bharat
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-1954
Reported in: (1955)ILLJ402MP
Nevaskar, J.1. This and other petitions Nos. 22, 30, 32, 37, 39 and 40 of 1953 involve the same questions. All these aforesaid petitions are submitted by the several petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a writ of mandamus or certiorari and for a decision that the order of the Government of Madhya Bharat, dated 16 December 1952, issued against them directing their removal from the judicial service of the State to be of no effect and that they still continue in the service of the State.2. I consider it convenient to consider the case of the petitioner Vijay Shankar for the decision of the questions involved in all these petitions, because after these questions are decided with reference to this petition that decision could be applied to other cases, although there may be some variation as regards some facts not material for the present purpose.3. Petitioner Vijay Shankar set forth in his petition that he had been in the service of Rajgarh State of C...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›