Madhya Pradesh Court April 1953 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahendra Bahadur Singh Vs. State of Madhya Bharat and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-09-1953
Reported in: 1953CriLJ1409
Dixit, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a suitable writ or a direction to the State of Madhya Bharat to forbear from acting in any manner by virtue of or under the Indian Arms Act, 1878 and for an order to the District Magistrate restraining him from enforcing a notice, directing the petitioner to deposit certain arms in his possession with the officer in charge of the police station in Laxmi Ganj Lashkar.2. The petitioner stated that he is in possession of two guns, two rifles and two revolvers; that he is the owner of these arms, which were duly registered under the Gwalior State Arms and Ammunition Control Order; that in anticipation of the extension of the Indian Arms Act to this State by the Part B States (Laws Act) 1951 (Act 3 of 1951) which came Into force on 1.4.1951, the Madhya Bharat Government issued a notification in the Gazette dated 25.3.1951 directing persons in possession of fire arms to apply for licenses in ac...
N.K. Chitnis Vs. State Through Factory Inspector
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-07-1953
Reported in: 1953CriLJ1397
ORDERNevaskar, J.1. These are five revision petitions in five different cases arising out of convictions of Mr. N.K. Chitnis, Engineer and Manager, Hukumchand Mills Ltd., Indore for offences under Sections 51 and 52 of Indian Factories Act No. LXIII of 1948 as applied to Madhya Bharat. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 150/- in respect of each of the offences aforesaid in each case.2. Appeals preferred against this decision of Additional City Magistrate, Indore, who was the trying Magistrate, were dismissed by the Sessions Judge, Indore.3. The accused has preferred these five different revision petitions to this Court and they are all being heard and disposed of together by a single judgment as the question involved in all of them is the same.4. The facts which gave rise to the present prosecutions are undisputed, They are that on 15th of May 1951, Factory Inspector inspected the said Mills and he found that the said Mill continued to work for over an unbroken period of 10 days i.e...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›