Madhya Pradesh Court March 1953 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramlal Hazarimal Vs. Hiralal Ramlal and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-31-1953
Reported in: 1953CriLJ1704
ORDERNevaskar, J.1. Accused Hiralal Ramlal was prosecuted before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sitamau for a charge under Section 409, Penal Code and was acquitted on 25.9.50. During the Police investigation the petitioner who is the father of the accused Hiralal had handed over a sum of Rs. 701-2-9 to the Police Officer in charge of the investigation on 5.12.1948. This sum, it appears, immediately after the receipt of the same from the petitioner Ramlal was handed over by the Police to the Municipality Sitamau in which the accused was serving and in respect of which the offence is alleged to have been committed without any specific order of the Court to that effect. On reference to the Panchanama Ex. P/3 with regard to the seizure of this sum it appears that this sum was seized, or attached by the Police during the course of investigation.In various columns in the forms printed for the purpose of use of Sitamau Police it was mentioned that this sum of Rs. 701-2-9 was being seized in ...
Jiyaji Rao Cotton Mills, Ltd. Vs. Industrial Court
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-24-1953
Reported in: (1954)ILLJ127MP
ORDERNevaskar, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution by the petitioner jiyaji Rao Cotton Mills, Ltd., Birla Nagar, Gwalior, for the issue of a writ of prohibition and also one of certiorari or for any other suitable direction. The writ of prohibition is prayed for in order to prevent the industrial court of Madhya Bharat from proceeding with the reference made to it under Section 73A, Bombay Industrial Relations Act, as applied to Madhya Bharat. The writ of certiorari is prayed for in order to secure the quashing of proceedings before that court.2. The facts which gave rise to the present petition are that: A notice of change as contemplated under Section 42(2), Industrial Relations Act, in force in this State and under Rule 52 of the rules thereunder, was given by the President, Mazdoor Congress, Gwalior, to the management of the petitioner mill. This was dated 23 December 1950. This notice of change was based on the allegation that the clerical employees of th...
Malojirao Shitole Vs. C.G. Matkar and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-19-1953
Reported in: 1953CriLJ1675
Dixit, J.1. By this application, the petitioner prays for the issue of a rule against the non-applicants for having committed contempt of this Court by issuing a notification No. 66 dated 4.12.1952, published in the Extra-ordinary Gazette of 4.12.1952 appointing 4.12.1952 as the date of resumption of all Jagir lands in the State of Madhya Bharat under Section 3(1) of the Madhya Bharat Abolition of Jagirs Act, 1951 and directing that 'on and from the above date of resumption' all Jagir lands mentioned in the schedule annexed to the notification shall stand resumed to the State.2. The background of this application, briefly stated is that sometime in December 1951 the petitioner and other persons filed applications under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of the Madhya Bharat Abolition of Jagirs Act (Act No. 28 of 1951). On the admission of those applications, this Court issued an order on 7.12.1951 restraining the State from giving effect to or acting in a...
Kanhaiyalal Sewaram Vs. State
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-06-1953
Reported in: 1954CriLJ6
Chaturvedi, J.1. The appellant Kanhaiyalal and his son Ramlal (who is only 17 or 18 years old) have been convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shajapur, under Section 304, Penal Code and have been sentenced to- five year's rigorous imprisonment each. '2. The prosecution story in brief is that on 10-7-1952 in the noon, in a field in village Patlaoda P. S. Shu Jaipur, District Shajapur, both the accused approached Siddu who was working there, Kanhaiyalal had an axe with him and gave a blow on the head of Siddu with the blunt side of the axe. Ramlal appellant had a 'pirani' (bamoo stick, sometimes with an iron blade) and gave a blow to the deceased with it. It is alleged that the deceased Siddu had beaten Kanhaiyalal's son Moti in the morning and so these two accused had gone to the field to take revenge from him. Siddu died then and there. A 'post-mortem' was performed next day i.e., on 11-7-1952 in Shujalpur by Dr. Lajpatrai P. W. 1 who deposed that Siddu had two external ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›