Madhya Pradesh Court September 1952 Judgments
Chothmal Narayanji Vs. Ramchandra Govindram
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-1952
Reported in: 1954CriLJ788
ORDERNevaskar, J.1. Complainant Chothmal who is a landlord filed a complaint under Section 467, I. P. O. against his tenant Ramchandra that the latter had submitted an application to the Indore Electric Supply Authorities in the name of the complainant and purporting to bear the signature of his son Manakchand stating that the said complainant had no objection to the grant of electric connection in the premises of the tenant. This application was in fact not signed by his son Manakchand but his signature was forged by the accused.2. In this complaint the trying Magistrate passed order under 8. 363, Criminal P. C. discharging the accused holding that even if all the facts stated by the complainant be assumed it cannot be said that an offence under Section 465, I. P. C. is committed by the mere fact of making a false document.3. This view was confirmed by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Indore. The complainant has therefore preferred this revision application.4. Mr. Shambhu...
Tag this Judgment!Tejsingh Man Singh Vs. State
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-08-1952
Reported in: 1954CriLJ543
ORDERNevaskar, J.1. On 20-9-1951 Station Officer Badnawar submitted an information to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Second Class, Badnawar that accused Tejsingh is desperate and dangerous and is in the habit of beating others on flimsy pretexts and the people of the village are under a great terror on account of him. He therefore should be bound down for keeping good behaviour under Section 110, Criminal P. C,2. Immediately on receipt of this information, the learned Magistrate passed an order under Section 117 (3), Criminal P. C. for an interim security to be furnished by Tejsingh for Rs. 5000/-. It was further ordered that on his failure to do so he may be kept in jail. The accused thereupon preferred a revision application before the Sessions Judge Dhar who dismissed the same. Accused Tejsingh has therefore come up in revision to this Court. 3. Mr. Sanghi who appears for Tejsingh contends that the order of the Magistrate under Section 117 (3), Criminal P. C. in the absence of an or...
Tag this Judgment!Gulamsaeed Gulam Amir Vs. the State
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-03-1952
Reported in: 1954CriLJ553
ORDERNevaskar, J.1. Accused Gulamsaeed was convicted by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Depalpur (Hatod) under Section 304A, I. P. C, and was sentenced to one year's rigorous imprisonment. The appeal filed against this conviction was unsuccessful. The accused has now come up in revision.2. The material facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows:3. In the evening of 8-2-1951 at about 5-30 or 6 P. M. accused was driving his goods truck M.B.G. 1260 while proceeding from Indore to Dhar. At Machal a place between Indore and Dhar there was Bazar day and temporary shops were set up by the side of the road leaving a narrow portion of it free for traffic. When the accused was taking this truck through the Bazar an eight year old girl named Basanti came running from the left and wanted to cross the road and go to the right. The girl was very near the truck and the accused therefore gave a swerve to his truck to the right in order to gain time to allow the girl to cross the road. The girl Bas...
Tag this Judgment!State Vs. Deewaki Nandan
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-02-1952
Reported in: 1954CriLJ87
Dixit, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 417 . Criminal P. C. from a decision of the Sessions Judge Gwalior in an appeal acquitting the respondent Devaki Nandan who had been convicted by the Railway Magistrate Lashkar of an offence under Section 7, Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1943.2. The charge against the respondent Devakinandan was that on 19-4-51, he travelled by a passenger train from Agra to Morena and carried with him 22 pairs of Dhoties without obtaining a permit in that behalf from the competent authority, and thus contravened Clause 3 of the Cotton Textile (Control Of Movement) Order 1948 made by the Central Government under Section 3, Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946. The accused admitted having transported by rail from Agra to Morena 22 pairs of Dhoties on 19-4-51. He also admitted that he had no permit. But he pleaded that he was taking these Dhoties in connection with the marriage of his sister and that he was not aware that a permit was re...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›