Madhya Pradesh Court September 1951 Judgments
State of Madhya Bharat Vs. Hiralalji and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-22-1951
Reported in: 1953CriLJ253
1. The State has filed this appeal under Section 417 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the order dated 21st August 1950 passed by the Additional City Magistrate, Indore in criminal case No. 143 of 1950 acquitting the two respondents of an offence under Section 87(D) of the Indore Companies Act.2. Respondent No. 1 Seth Hiralalji is the Managing Director of the Kalyanmal Mills Ltd., Indore, incorporated under the Indore Companies Act (Act No. 6 of 1914) and respondent No. 2 is his son who is also a permanent Director of the above said Mills. Both the respondents are proprietors of the Firm Tilokchand Kalyanmal and Co. Indore, which seems to be a joint-family business firm. This firm works as Secretaries, Treasurers and Agents of the Kalyanmal Mills Ltd., Indore.3. On 17th November 1947, the Kalyanmal Mills Ltd., and Tilokchand Kalyanmal and Co., both executed a promissory note for a sum of Rs. 2 lacs at four and a half per cent interest in favour of the Bank of Indore Ltd. wherei...
Tag this Judgment!Ram Sahay Vs. the State
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-1951
Reported in: 1953CriLJ27
Dixit, J.1. This is a petition in revision to set aside the proceedings under Section 244 Kanoon Mal Gwalior Samvat 1893 pending in the Court of First Class Magistrate, Morar for the realisation of certain Government dues recoverable as arrears of land revenue under Section 31 of, the Madhya Bharat Excise Act Samvat 2006 (Act No. 29 of 1949) from the applicant. It appears from the record that on 5.4.1950, the Superintendent, Customs and Excise Department addressed a letter to the First Class Magistrate Morar stating that an amount of Rs. 52000/- was due from the petitioner and that he had failed to pay the amount inspite of a notice to that effect, and requesting the Magistrate to take proceedings under Section 236 of the Gwalior Excise Manual Samvat 1995 for the recovery of the amount as arrears of land revenue. The learned Magistrate declined to take any action on the basis of the letter. Subsequently, on 18.7.50, a proper application was filed by the Department for the recovery of t...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›