Madhya Pradesh Court April 1951 Judgments
Krishnakant Vyas and anr. Vs. State
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-1951
Reported in: 1953CriLJ1323
Kaul, C.J.1. This is an application made by Krishnakant Vyas and C.M. Shah for a certificate under Article 134(1)(c) of the Constitution.2. By an order of 23.4.1951 the petitioners Krishnakant Vyas and C.M. Shah along with one Shyamsundar Vyas were convicted for contempt of this High Court. Krishnakant Vyas and Shyamsundar Vyas were sentenced to one month's simple imprisonment each and C.M. Shah was ordered to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- or to undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days in default.3. The contempt in respect of which they were convicted and sentenced consisted in a story written by Shyamsundar Vyas which cast foul aspersions on the integrity of one of the Judges of this Court in discharge of his judicial functions. The story was published in a Hindi daily newspaper issued from Indore whereof Krishnakant Vyas is the Editor and C.M. Shah the Printer and Publisher. Krishnakant Vyas and C.M. Shah have expressed their intention to appeal to the Supreme Court against our order and ma...
Tag this Judgment!Chiddu Vs. the State
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-26-1951
Reported in: 1951CriLJ1533
ORDERDixit, J.1. This is an application under Article 134(o) of the Constitution of India for a certificate that my decision in Cri. Revn. No. 172 of 1950, The State v. Madan is a fib one for appeal to the Supreme Court.2. The facts of the case are stated in my order dated 8-3-1961 disposing of the Criminal Revision. I do not propose to repeat them here. By that order I reversed the decision of the Sessions Judge Gwalior and restored the order of the City Magistrate Lashkar directing that certain ornaments seized by the Police from the applicant and suspected to have been stolen shall be held at the disposal of the Government. As the person entitled to the property was not known, the Magistrate issued a proclamation, under Section 523 (2), Criminal P.C. No person came forward to establish his claim to the property within six months from the date of the proclamation. The Magistrate, therefore, proceeded under Section 521 and on the evidence produced by the applicant and the State, came ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›