Madhya Pradesh Court October 1951 Judgments
Kundan Lal Vs. the State
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-22-1951
Reported in: 1953CriLJ1156
ORDERDixit, J.1. This is a reference by the learned Sessions Judge of Gwalior recommending that the sentence of fine of Rs. 100/- imposed on Kundanlal by the City Magistrate, Lashkar for an offence under Section 8, Madhya Bharat Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act (Act No. III of 1948) be enhanced. On 23.4.51, the reference was admitted and on 2.8.51 a notice was issued to Kundanlal to show cause why the sentence should not be enhanced. Kundanlal has now filed objections contending that his conviction under Section 8 of Act 3 of 1948 is itself illegal and that he should be acquitted of the charge of having contravened the provisions of Section 3, Madhya Bharat Kerosene Control Order of 1949.2. The facts are that on 29.4.1950, the Chief Inspector, Civil Supplies Department, received information that Kundanlal was selling kerosene oil and storing it without obtaining licence for the purpose under the Kerosene Control Order. On receipt of this information, the Chief Inspector sent a...
Tag this Judgment!Narsingh Jivraj Soni and ors. Vs. the State
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-17-1951
Reported in: 1953CriLJ1121
ORDERKaul, C.J.1. Narsing along with seven others was convicted on a summary trial under Section 4, Gambling Act by the learned Municipal Magistrate, Indore, for an offence under the Gambling Act and sentenced to one month's simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200/- each. Soniram who was accused No. 4 was further convicted under Section 3, Gambling Act, and sentenced to one month's simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200/- for that offence. Both the sentences of imprisonment were to run concurrently in his case. An appeal preferred by them to the Sessions Judge of Indore was dismissed; hence this revision application.2. The material facts lie within a short compass: On the night of the last Diwali festival Sub-Inspector Chaturbhuj of Police Station Bada Sarafa received information that gambling was going on in a certain house in his circle. He satisfied himself as to the correctness of the information received and raided the house. He took with him besides others, Head Constable Ba...
Tag this Judgment!Rahim Poonaji Vs. Abdul Rahim and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-1951
Reported in: 1953CriLJ1027
ORDERKaul, C.J.1. These two revision applications have been filed by Abdul Rahim. He does not know to which Court he is to go to seek redress. He has gone to two Courts - the Sessions Judge Court, Ujjain and the Sessions Judge Court, Indore - and both of them have held that the matter agitated by Abdul Rahim could not be taken cognizance of by them hence the petitioner comes to this Court. He has filed an application in revision against the order of each Sessions Judge. Application No. 122 of 1950 is against the order of the learned Sessions Judge of Ujjain and Application No. 123 of 1950 is against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Indore.2. The material facts are shortly stated: Abdul Rahim who lives within the precincts of Ujjain Railway Station filed a complaint against his alleged wife Jumrath and Abdul Rahiman for offences under Sections 497 and 498, I.P.C. in the Court of the Railway Magistrate Mhow, There are two Railway Magistrates for the whole of Madhya Bharat. One...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›