Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur Court February 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mukund Kumar ChourasiA. Vs. Rani Durgavati VishwavidyalayA.
Court: Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
Decided on: Feb-25-2011
1. Shri Sheel Nagu, Counsel for petitioners. Shri Shiv Kumar Shrivastava, Counsel for respondents. This order shall decide W.P.No.3731/2011(O)-Mukund Kumar Chourasia v. Rani Durgavati Vishwavidyalaya & another and W.P.No.3733/11(O)-Gulshan Ahmed Qureshi v. Rani Durgavati Vishwavidyalaya & another.2. Facts of W.P.No.3731/11(O) are that the petitioner is a student of LL.M. He appeared in 1st Semester of the course in March-April, 2010 in which he could not clear one subject namely Law and Social Transformation in India. The University has provided A.T.K.T. to such student to clear the said subject alongwith the next examination, but in the 2nd semester, petitioner was not extended such an opportunity to appear in the aforesaid subject as there was no arrangement to appear in the remaining subject of 1st Semester. The petitioner has been permitted to appear in the said subject at the time of conduction of the 3rd Semester examination on 21.2.2011 and petitioner has appeared in the said su...
Ashish Singh. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh.
Court: Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
Decided on: Feb-21-2011
1- Challenging the order-dated 28.2.2009 passed by the Collector, and the order-dated 23.3.2009 passed by the Commissioner in the matter of appointment of Panchayat Karmi, to the Panchayat in question, petitioner has filed this writ petition. 2- In pursuance to a policy formulated by the State Government on 25.6.2007, for appointment of Panchayat Karmis, Gram Panchayat Nagda under Janpad Panchayat Khurai issued an advertisement on 5.7.2007 calling for desirable candidates to submit their application on or before 20.7.2007 as per the terms and conditions stipulated therein. The advertisement dated 5.7.2007 is Annexure P/1. In all 20 applications were received and on 21.8.2007, meeting was called for and a merit list was prepared. In accordance to merit, petitioner having received 71% marks in Class X Examination was kept at Serial No.1. However, respondent No.6, who had secured 64.2% marks, was directed to be appointed by resolution of certain Panchas on 21.8.2007 Annexure P/2. As the r...
Jagdish Prasad SaxenA. Vs. Smt. Narayani Devi.
Court: Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
Decided on: Feb-17-2011
1. The appellant has preferred this Misc. Appeal being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 8.9.1997 passed by the VII Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Bhopal in Civil Appeal No. 77-A/1997 thereby case was remanded back to the trial Court for re-trial.2. Facts of the cases give rise to this Misc. Appeal in short is that it is undisputed that one Sheetal Prasad was the owner of the house, who died in 1930. His widow Munakka Bai died in 1984. Sheetal Prasad and Munakka Bai had two daughters namely Narayani Devi and Narbadi Bai. Both were married. Narbadi Bai died in 1943 leaving behind a son namely, Jagdish Prasad who was the plaintiff of the original suit.3. Plaintiff/appellant filed a suit for declaration that he is in possession of the suit house as co-owner and gift deed executed by Munakka Bai on 18.12.1973, is illegal and void abinitio, because Munakka Bai was not able to execute the gift deed due to old age and mental disorder.4. Defendant/respondent denied t...
Anupam ShrivastavA. Vs. Union of IndiA.
Court: Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
Decided on: Feb-15-2011
1. In response to our order dated 28-01- 2011 respondents No. 1 to 4 have produced the original record pertaining to petitioner's promotion as Assistant Material Manager (senior scale). With consent of the learned counsel for the parties the petition is heard finally.2. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution is directed against an order dated 29- 12-2010 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench, Jabalpur, in Original Application No. 1079 of 2010.3. The Original Application before the Tribunal was at the instance of respondent No. 5 herein, who sought quashment of order dated 15-12-2010 whereby petitioner herein was promoted as ad-hoc Assistant Material Manager (senior scale) in the scale Rs. 15600- 39100, GP Rs. 6600/- . The challenge was on the ground of seniority. It was claimed by respondent No. 5 in said Original Application that petitioner herein since was junior cannot be allowed to supersede even on adhoc basis.4. The Tribunal on the very firs...
S.B. MirzA. Vs. Narottam Khare and Another.
Court: Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
Decided on: Feb-14-2011
1. Invoking the extra-ordinary powers of this Court under Section 482, Cr.P.C. petitioner has preferred this petition for quashing the entire proceedings pending before the Courts below i.e. against the order of Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur dated 16.12.2008 unregistered revision arising out of order dated 14.5.2007 in Cri. Case no.378/07 of the Court of J.MF.C. Nawgaon, district Chhatarpur by which the learned Magistrate has issued process in respect of offence under section 294 and 342 of IPC against him.2. The undisputed facts of the case are that: (i) The petitioner is a Inspector of Police had been incharge of P.S. Nawgaon, district Chhatarpur on the relevant date i.e. 16.4.05 and 17.4.05.(ii) A case of Gambling through Crime no.104/05 for the offence u/s 13 of the Gambling Act registered by the applicant against ten persons including Arvind Khare the son of complainant/ Respondent no.1 Narrotattam Khare.(iii) Respondent no.1 Narrotattam Khare is also a retired Inspector of Police.3....
Ram Bhuwan ShuklA. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh.
Court: Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
Decided on: Feb-11-2011
1- Challenging the order-dated 8.11.2005 Annexure P/1, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner under Rule 23 of the M.P. Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 has been rejected, petitioner has filed this writ petition. Challenge is also made to the order of punishment dated 20.7.2001 Annexure P/2, by which penalty of compulsory retirement, confirmation of the period of suspension and recovery of Rs.1,19,796=50 has been ordered against the petitioner.2- Records indicate that petitioner was holding the post of Accountant in the office of Divisional Ayurveda Officer, Rewa. On 4.7.1989, while working as Accountant, the Drawing and Disbursing Officer, one Shri Ram Sharan Shrivastava, is alleged to have directed the petitioner and one cashier Shri Rampal Pandey, to go to the bank and withdraw a sum of Rs.2,39,593=00. Petitioner is said to have gone to the Bank and while returning from the Bank it seems that the aforesaid amount was looted by certain unsocial elem...
Brijesh S/O Roopsingh Baghel. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh.
Court: Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
Decided on: Feb-11-2011
1. The appellants have preferred these appeals against the impugned judgment dated 10.8.1996 passed by the learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Raisen in S.T. Nos. 2/93 and 110/2000 by which appellant Brijesh has been convicted under Sections 148 and 324 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for one year with fine of Rs.200/- and RI for two years with fine of Rs. 2,000/-respectively, with default stipulations and appellants Rajesh Baghel, Jivan Singh, Rakesh and Rajesh S/o Nandlal have been convicted under Sections 147 and 324/149 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for six months with fine of Rs.100/- and RI for two years with fine of Rs.2,000/- respectively with default stipulations.2. The aforesaid appeals arose out of the same judgment and order therefore they are being disposed of by this common judgment.3. Prosecution case in short is that on 1.8.1992 at about 4.00 p.m., when complainant Preetam Singh (PW1) was standing in front of the house of his uncle Halke, accused Br...
Syndicate Bank, and ors. Vs. Gian Chand Jain, and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
Decided on: Feb-11-2011
1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 31/10/1994 passed by Second Additional District Judge, Bhopal in Civil Suit No. 45-B/1984, appellant/plaintiff has preferred this appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure.2. Facts of the case in short are that respondent No.1 had availed loan of Rs.7,000/- on 11.5.1981, Rs.2,500/- on 13.5.1981 and Rs.500/- on 19.5.1981 and he had also availed the entire loan of Rs.10,000/- in his account and for which he had executed written receipts. It is further pleaded that he made part payments of Rs.500/- on 11.6.1981, Rs.702/- on 11.7.1981 and Rs.1,000/- on 10.9.1981, thereafter he failed to pay any further amount towards principal and interest and committed default in payment of the dues of plaintiff. Despite repeated demand he did not pay the remaining amount. Ultimately, the plaintiff sent a notice on 12.1.1984 to all respondents/defendants. But they have failed to pay the remaining amount, therefore, after adjusting the afores...
The Project Director. Vs. Ms. Mamta Shrivastava and Another.
Court: Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
Decided on: Feb-11-2011
1- This application has been filed interalia contending that in view of the setting aside of the award passed by the Labour Court and the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.3252/2000, on 4.4.2005, the amount deposited by virtue of the provisions of Section 17- B, of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'), be refunded back to the applicant.2- Non-applicant No.1 Ms. Mamta Shrivastava was working in the applicant's establishment. Her services were terminated and, therefore, an industrial dispute was raised before the competent authority. Conciliation having failed matter was referred to the Labour Court, Rewa wherein it was registered as Case No.3/ID Act (Ref)/99 and by an award dated 20.10.1999, respondent/non-applicant No.1 Ms. Mamta Shrivastava was directed to be reinstated with full back wages and other consequential benefits. Challenging the aforesaid order passed by the Labour Court on 20.10.1999, Writ Petition No.3252/2000 was filed by ...
Ramesh and Ohers. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh.
Court: Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
Decided on: Feb-11-2011
1. Learned First Additional Sessions Judge Damoh has passed the impugned judgment dated 24.2.20104 in Sessions Trial No. 234/2008 thereby appellants have been convicted under Section 148, 307/149, 325/149, 324/149 and 323/149 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo RI for 1 year, RI for 3 years and fine of Rs., 1,000/-, RI for 2 years and fine of Rs. 500/-, RI for 1 year and RI for 3 months, with default stipulations, in lieu of fine, respectively.2. Being aggrieved, the appellants have preferred this appeal under Section 374 (2) of Code of Criminal Procedure.3. The prosecution case in short is that on 24.4.2008 at about 6 p.m., waste water of the house of accused/appellant Ramlal was flowing in front of the house of complainant Kailash Patel (PW1). Kailash Patel objected the same. At this juncture, appellants Ramesh having a farsa, Hari @ Hargovind having a farsa, Bhajan and Ramlal having axe and Rupabai having a danda came to the spot and abused complainant Kailash and they ass...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »