Madhya Pradesh Gwalior Court August 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijay Bahadur S/O Jai Shriram Jatav Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh Gwalior
Decided on: Aug-16-2011
1. Challenge in this criminal appeal is to the judgment of the Sessions Court dated January 21 st ,1999 in Sessions Trial Case No.123/99 whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offences under sections 302,201 and 404 IPC and sentenced to undergo various terms of imprisonment, maximum of which is life imprisonment besides fine with default stipulation. 2. As per the prosecution case, the deceased had left his village in Etawah, Uttar Pradesh on January 1 st , 1996 after telling his wife that he was going to the house of the appellant at Navalpura, District Bhind in connection with sale of his land in village Puleh which he got from his in-laws. As the deceased had not returned to his home till January 4 th ,1996 his wife sent her son Vijendra (PW 12) to the house of his 'Nandoi' Ramnath (PW 11) in search of her husband. PW 11 Ramnath on enquiries made at Navalpura, District Bhind came to know that the deceased had sold his land in village Puleh to PW 22 Raghuveer Singh on Janua...
Devkinandan Vs. State of Mp and Others
Court: Madhya Pradesh Gwalior
Decided on: Aug-11-2011
1. Brief facts for adjudication of this matter are as under:- 2. The respondent No.1-State of Madhya Pradesh acquired the land belonging to the petitioner and his mother namely Smt.Dhanwanti Bai for public purpose under the provisions of Land Acquisition Act. In lieu of the land acquired, the compensation was awarded by the Collector by his award. Since the award was not adequate, the petitioner and his mother and other claimants applied for reference under the said Act. The reference was made to the Reference Court, namely, the Court of Second Additional District Judge, Bhind under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act. The said Court is hereinafter called as 'Reference Court'. The Reference Court enhanced the compensation by award dated 29.11.1996 (Annexure P/2). The award got stamp of approval by this Court in Appeal preferred by the State of Madhya Pradesh. 3. The case of the petitioner is that the said award is a “decree” within the meaning of Section 2 of the Code of Civ...
Jinendra Kumar JaIn Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Madhya Pradesh Gwalior
Decided on: Aug-10-2011
1.This intra-Court appeal filed by appellant Jinendra Kumar Jain is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 03 rd July, 2008 in Writ Petition No.1375/05 setting aside his selection for LPG Distributorship for block Narwar, District Shivpuri. The selection of the appellant by Indian Oil Corporation Limited for allotting LPG Distributorship has been set aside by the learned Single Judge on the ground that he was not eligible for such allotment on the date of application as he did not have the title of the land, particulars of which were given in the application submitted for allotment. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case giving rise to this appeal are that the Indian Oil Corporation Limited ( IOCL ) [ respondents 2 and 3 herein ] had issued an advertisement in Nav Bharat Times dated 13/10/2001 inviting applications from eligible persons for allotment of LPG Distributorship for blocks Narwar and Pohri, District Shivpuri. Clause (1) contained in the advertisement ...
Ved Prakash Mukhariya Vs. Balmukund Sharma and Others
Court: Madhya Pradesh Gwalior
Decided on: Aug-09-2011
1. Shri Jitendra Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri D.D.Bansal, Advocate for the respondent No.1. With the consent of parties, the matter is finally heard. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties agreed to address the Court on the question of preliminary objection raised by Shri D.D.Bansal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1. 2. Shri Bansal submits that a bare perusal of impugned order dated 20.5.2011 shows that it is an ad interim order directing maintaining status quo between the parties, which is necessarily an order passed under Order XXXIX Rr.1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. By passing the said order an interim injunction was granted and reply was directed to be filed on the application under Order XXXIX Rr.1 and 2, C.P.C. Thus, the respondent submits that it is, in fact, an order passed under Order XXXIX Rr.1 and 2, C.P.C. On the contrary, learned counsel for the petitioner Shri Jitendra Sharma submits that it is an application under Section 15...
Shrimati Kala Bai Prajapati Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
Court: Madhya Pradesh Gwalior
Decided on: Aug-09-2011
1. This is an intra-Court appeal filed by the appellant seeking to challenge the order of the learned Single Judge dated 21 st September,2010 by which her writ petition for grant of family pension was dismissed. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case, giving rise to this appeal are that the husband of the appellant was employed as a gangman by the respondents on daily wage basis since 01 st May, 1973. His services were regularised under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Irrigation Department Work Charged And Contingency Paid Employees Recruitment And Conditions of Service Rules, 1977 ( for brevity, “Contingency Rules of 1977”) with effect from 09 th April, 1991. Said regularisation was in terms of recommendations of the selection committee. The husband of the appellant died on 03 rd August, 1997, i.e. almost within six years of regularisation of her late husband in the service of the respondents. After his death, the appellant being his widow, applied for family pensio...
Rinku @ Yatendra Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh Gwalior
Decided on: Aug-04-2011
(1) This revision petition under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, preferred by the petitioneraccused is directed against an order dated 10 th February 2011 passed in Sessions Case No. 114/2005 by the Seventh Addl. Sessions Judge Gwalior (M.P.) refusing thereby prayer of the petitioner/accused for getting the disputed handwritings of Ex.P/2, P/3 and P/4 compared by a Handwriting Expert with the words or figures alleged to have been made by such person. (2) The facts, in short, are that the petitioner/accused in the present case is facing prosecution for commission of offence punishable under Section 302 of I.P.C. It is contended by the learned counsel that on receiving information about the commission of alleged offence, the ASI O.P. Yadav rushed to the spot and reduced in writing the Dehati Nalishi and Marg, marked as Ex.P/4 and Ex.P/2. On the basis of the aforesaid, an FIR was written by Ramlakhan (PW-2) at police station which is marked as Ex.P/3. It is alleged...
Kastoorchand Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh Gwalior
Decided on: Aug-04-2011
(1) This revision petition under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 preferred by accused/petitioner is directed against a Judgment dated 9 th August 2010 rendered in Criminal Appeal No. 41/2009 by the Additional Sessions Judge Chachoda, district Guna, setting aside thereby the Judgment of conviction and sentence dated 05 th January 2009 recorded in Criminal Case No. 223/2007 by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chachoda, district Guna, convicting the petitioner-accused for commission of offence under Sections 147, 325/149 (on two counts) and 323/149 (four counts and sentencing him to suffer six months' R.I. with fine of Rs.100/-, three years' R.I. with fine of Rs.100/- and again six months' R.I. with fine of Rs.100/- and in default to suffer additional rigorous imprisonments of one month, two months and one month, respectively. By the said impugned judgment while setting aside the conviction and sentence as mentioned herein-before, the case was remitted back to t...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›