Kolkata Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Oriental Gas Co. Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Dinesh Viniyog Ltd. and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-05-2017
ORDER EC No.323 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction THE ORIENTAL GAS Co.LTD.& ORS.Versus DINESH VINIYOG LTD.& ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 5th September 2017. Appearance: Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee, Sr.Advocate Mr.Shaunak Mitra, Advocate Mr.Sachin Shukla, Advocate Mr.Tridib Bose, Advocate ...for the decree-holdeRs.Mr.S.N. Mitra, Sr.Advocate Mr.Arindam Mukherjee, Advocate ...for the judgment-debtORS.This is an application for execution of a foreign decree dated 12th March 1988. maintainability of The judgment-debtors have questioned the this application on the ground that this application was filed on 19th July 2011, after lapse of a period of 12 years from the date of the decree. It is submitted that a prior execution application filed by the decree-holders on 19th December 2006 was disposed of by an order dated 17th March 2009 and if any application was further required to be filed for execution of the said decree, then such applic...
Eskay Video Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Federation of Cine Technicians and Workers o ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
ORDER SHEET GA2932of 2017 With CS196of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE ESKAY VIDEO PVT.LTD.Versus FEDERATION OF CINE TECHNICIANS AND WORKERS OF EASTERN INDIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 4th September, 2017. Appearance: Mr.Ranjan Bachawat, Sr.Adv.Mr.Suvashish Sengupta, Adv.Mr.Orijit Chatterjee, Adv.MRS.Arunima Laha, Adv.Mr.Indranil Karfa, Adv.Ms.Adreeka Pandey, Adv.for the plaintiff. Mr.Jishnu Shah, Sr.Adv.Mr.Yash Vardhan Deora, Adv.for the defendant no.1. Mr.Joydip Kar, Sr.Adv.Mr.Soumya Majumdar, Adv.Mr.Aryak Dutt, Adv.Mr.S.Ghosh, Adv.for the defendant no.5. The Court : The film relates to shooting of two feature filMs.namely, Tui Sudhu Amar and Chalbaaz. a producer of filMs.The plaintiff is The plaintiff alleges that the defendant no.1 has blacklisted the plaintiff and members of the defendant nos.4 and 5 in acting and/or being associated with the said filMs.It is alleged that the defendant no.1 is preventin...
Bengal Srei Infrastructure Development and Ors. Vs. Union of India and ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side W.P.No.116 of 2006 Bengal Srei Infrastructure Development & ORS.versus Union of India & ORS.For the Petitioners : Mr.Abhratosh Majumder, Addl. Adv.General Ms.Anupa Banerjee, Advocate Mr.Paritosh Sinha, Advocate Mr.Amitava Mitra, Advocate Mr.Aritra Chakraborty, Advocate For the Respondents : Md.Nizamuddin, Advocate Mr.R.K.Sinha, Advocate Hearing concluded on : August 7, 2017 Judgment on : September 1, 2017 DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:- The petitioners have assailed Chapter XII-H of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as unconstitutional being opposed by Article 14 and 246(1) read with Entry 82 in List I of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing in support of the writ petition has contended at the hearing of the writ petition that, the impugned Chapter if read down in the manner suggested, then, the entire Chapter can pass the test of constitutionality. He has referred to th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›