Kolkata Court April 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
J. H. Industrial Corporation Vs. Vijendra Kumar Goel
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-13-2017
In The High Court At Calcutta Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side GA61of 2017 CS58of 2014 J.H. Industrial Corporation -Vs.- Vijendra Kumar Goel Before : The Honble Justice Arijit Banerjee For the petitioner/plaintiff : Ms. Manju Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Tiwari, Adv. For the defendant/respondent : Mr. K. Thakkar, Adv. Mr. Brajesh Jha, Adv. Mr. Arif Ali, Adv. Heard On :11. 01.2017, 25.01.2017, 30.01.2017, 10.02.2017, 14.02.2017, 21.02.2017, 02.03.2017, 14.03.2017, 21.03.2017, 22.03.2017 CAV On :28. 03.2017 Judgment On :13. 04.2017 Arijit Banerjee, J.:- (1) This application has been taken out by the defendant for recalling of a decree for Rs. 26,54,355.74 along with pendente lite interest at the rate of 18 per cent per annum and interest on judgment at the rate of 12 per cent per annum. By the said decree costs assessed at Rs.60,000/- was also awarded in favour of the plaintiff. (2) The said decree was passed when the suit appeared in the undefended list in view of the ...
Anuradha Doval Vs. The Controller of Patents and Designs and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-13-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE BEFORE: THE HONBLE JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN AID No.1 of 2015 ANURADHA DOVAL versus THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS & ORS.For the Petitioner : Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Debnath Ghosh, Adv., Subhashish Sengupta, Adv., Sanjay Ginodia, Adv., Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Adv.For the Respondent No.3 : Mr.Suddhasatva Banerjee, Adv., Mr.Supratik Roy, Adv.For the Respondents : Mr.Rabi Prosad Mookherjee, Adv.Heard On : 09.02.2017, 16.02.2017, 09.03.2017, 30.03.2017, 06.04.2017. Judgment On : 13.04.2017 Soumen Sen, J.:- The appeal is directed against an order dated 10th December, 2014 under Section 36 of the Designs Act, 2000 by which the application for cancellation of the design registered on 7th May, 2009 being registered design No.222799 in respect of Bottle Cap in Class 09-01 in the name of Anuradha Doval was allowed. The novelty statement endorsed in each representation sheet reads:The novelty of the said design resides in the shape and configuratio...
Bhuri Devi Vs. State of West Bengal and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-13-2017
OD-3 ORDER SHEET WP1131of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BHURI DEVI Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE RANJIT KUMAR BAG Date : 13th April, 2017. Appearance:Mr.Debabrata Saha Roy, Adv.Mr.Pingal Bhattacharya, Adv.for the petitioner Ms.Chama Mukherjee, Adv.Ms.Sucharita Roy, Adv...for the State The Court : The petitioner has filed this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for direction upon the respondents to grant licence of kerosene oil dealership to the petitioner on compassionate ground of death of her husband and other ancillary reliefs. Mr.Pancham Singh, the husband of the petitioner, had the licence of kerosene oil dealership. He died on August 21, 2014. The petitioner, claiming to be the wife of the deceased Pancham Singh, filed an application before the respondent No.5, Sub-divisional Controller (Food & Supply) Howrah on September 8, 2014 praying for transfer of kerosene oil...
Khem Chand Dhingra Vs. Prabir Roy Chowdhury and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-13-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION GA No.1981 OF2013IN E.C.83 OF2007Khem Chand Dhingra VERSUS Prabir Roy Chowdhury & ORS.BEFORE The Honble Justice HARISH TANDON Mr.Jaydip Kar, Sr.Adv.Mr.Sourav Sengupta. For the Applicant. Date : 13.04.2017 Mr.S.N.Mukherjee, Sr.Adv., Mr.Jishnu Saha, Sr.Adv., Mr.Arindam Banerjee, Mr.Sandip Agarwal, Mr.Zeeshan Haque, Mr.Ashis Mukherjee. For the Respondents. The Court : The present application has been filed taking advantage of the observations made by the Division Bench in the judgment and order dated 18th February, 2013 passed in APO No.387 and 388 of 2011. Before proceeding to record the observations recorded in the said order by the Division Bench and affirmed by the Supreme Court it would be apposite to narrate the salient facts involved in the instant case. Admittedly, one Bhupatish Roy Chowdhury was the owner of the tea estate known as Toonbarrie Tea Estate and entered into an agreement with Khem Chand Dhingra for s...
Itc Limited Vs. Green India Rice Millers and Exporters Private Limited ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-12-2017
GA1091of 2017 With CS58of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ITC LIMITED Versus GREEN INDIA RICE MILLERS AND EXPORTERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date :12. h April, 2017. Appearance: Mr.S.N.Mookerjee, Adv.Sr. Adv. Mr.Ranjan Bachawat, Adv. Mr.Debnath Ghosh, Adv. Mr.S.Roychowdhury, Adv. Mr.S.Mitra, Adv. ..for the petitioner. Ms.Maya Kumar, Adv. Mr.Sahil Bhalaik, Adv. Mr.Varun Kedia, Adv. ..for the respondents. The Court: The plaintiff is the registered owner of the word mark AASHIRVAAD in class 30. The plaintiff holds several registration for word device AASHIRVAAD which is evident from the Certificates of Registrations annexed to the petition being annexures c, c1 and c2. Apart from the aforesaid trade mark registrations, the petitioner has also obtained registration and made applications in respect of various trade dresses, get up, packaging, labels bearing the trade mark AASHIRVAAD. The petitioner claims that sinc...
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. Vs. M/S. Bengal Shelter Hous ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-12-2017
OD-23 APO No.297 of 2016 CP No.723 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (INDIA) LTD.Versus M/S.BENGAL SHELTER HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE SIDDHARTHA CHATTOPADHYAY Date : 12th April, 2017. Appearance: Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Sr.Adv.Mr.J.Chowdhury, Adv.Ms.Vidushi Chokhani, Adv..for the appellant Mr.Joy Saha, Sr.Ms.Jayati Chowdhury, Ms.Rima Das, Ms.M.Chowdhury, Mr.Ishan Saha, Ms.Ranjana Seal, Adv.Adv.Adv.Adv.Adv.Adv.The Court : The order impugned is somewhat unusual in that a creditors winding-up petition has been dismissed without reference to the company. The company Court noticed in the order impugned dated September 26, 2016 that the appellant herein had already instituted proceedings before a Debts Recovery Tribunal in respect of the claim that was made the subject-matter of the petition before the company Court. The Court thereupon proceeded to pass the...
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-12-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE GA3771of 2016 APO317of 2016 Smt. Basu Rani Paul Corporation & Ors. -Vs- Employees State Insurance Present : The Honble Rakesh Tiwari, J.AND The Honble Mir Dara Sheko, J.For the appellant : Mr. Sutirtha Das, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. Arindam Moitra, Advocate Heard on :07. 02.2017 Judgment on :12. 04.2017 Delivered by Honble Justice Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant Basu Rani Paul, challenging the order dated November 15, 2016 passed in Writ Petition No.380 of 2012 (Basu Rani Paul Vs- Employees State Insurance Corporation and another).2. The facts of the case are that appellant petitioner hereinafter referred to as PPC India preferred the writ petition aforesaid inter-alia praying for a direction to the effect that Employees State Insurance Act 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the ESI Act) is not applicable upon the petitioner establishment.3. The PPC is a proprietorship fi...
S.S.Civil Construction Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. The Union of India an ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-12-2017
ORDER SHEET WP No.31 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side S.S.Civil Construction PVT.LTD.& Another Versus The Union of India & ORS.B e f o r e: The Honble Justice Debangsu Basak Dated, the April 12, 2017. Appearance: Mr.Biswanath Chatterjee, Adv.Mr.Ashis Kumar Mukherjee, Adv.For the petitioneRs.Ms.Aparna Banerjee, Adv.For the respondents. The Court:- The petitioners assail an e-tender process undertaken by the Indian Railways for construction of proposed rail over bridge at Kamarkundu Station. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that, the fiRs.petitioner has the requisite eligibility criteria to participate in such tender process. The financial bid of the fiRs.petitioner is far lower than the one which has since been accepted by the railway authorities. He refers to the eligibility criteria and submits that, the fiRs.petitioner had undertaken work of similar nature far in excess of the 35% of the tender value of the subject tender...
Indoforeign (Agent) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-12-2017
Form No.J(2) GA NO.942 OF2017WITH APOT NO.94 OF2017IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE INDO-FOREIGN (AGENT) PVT. LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE AND The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date :12. h April, 2017. MR.RAMESH KR.CHOWDHURY, MR.PROTYUSH CHATTERJEE, ADVOCATES FOR APPELLANT MR.AMITABRATA RAY, MR.BHASKAR PRASAD BANERJEE, ADVOCATES FOR CUSTOMS AUTHORITY Aniruddha Bose, J.:1. The appellant is holder of a licence, at present suspended, which was issued under the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004. These Regulations of 2004 stood superseded by the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013, which came into effect from 21st June, 2013. There has been subsequent amendment to the 2013 Regulations on 5th January, 2016 but for the purpose of adjudication of this appeal, this amendment is not of much significance. The present appeal is against the judgement of a learned Single Judge of this Cou...
Itc Ltd. Vs. Irinjalakuda Town Cooperative Bank Ltd. and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-11-2017
GA3382of 2016 CS252of 2016 ITC LTD. Versus IRINJALAKUDA TOWN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. & ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date :11. h April, 2017. Appearance: Mr.S.N.Mookerjee, Sr. Adv. Mr.Debnath Ghosh, Adv. Mr.Sayan Roy Chowdhury, Adv. Mr.Soumya Sen, Adv. Mr.P.Sinha, Adv. Mr.M.Mukherjee, Adv. Mr.J.Roy, Adv. Mr.Ayan De, Adv. ..for the plaintiff. Mr.Rajeev Kumar Jain, Adv. Mr.Piyush Kumar Roy, Adv. Ms.Subika Paul, Adv. ..for the respondents. The Court: This is an application for revocation of leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent filed by the respondents in a suit for infringement and passing off action. The plaintiff has filed a composite suit of passing off an injunction. The defendant no.1 carries on banking business in a nondescript town in Kerala. The defendant no.1 seeks to use the name of the town as part of its business name. The part of the matter which is of relevance is the abbreviation of the name of the respondent no.1 namely, the first letter of the three ke...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »