Kolkata Court March 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dev Sahitya Kutir Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Samir Kumar Roy and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
ORDER SHEET GA No.444 of 2017 With CS No.22 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE DEV SAHITYA KUTIR PVT.LTD.& ANR. Versus SAMIR KUMAR ROY & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 6th March, 2017. Appearance: Mr.Ranjan Bachawat, Sr.Adv.Mr.Paritosh Sinha, Adv.Mr.Debnath Ghosh, Adv.Mr.Sayan Roychowdhury, Adv.Mr.Saubhik Chowdhury, Adv.Ms.Meenakshi Manot, Adv.Ms.Garima Singh Jhawar, Adv.for the plaintiffs/petitioneRs.Mr.Nabi Chowdhury, Adv.MRS.Soma Roy Chowdhury, Adv.for the respondent nos.1 to 5. Mr.R.Ghosh, Adv.Mr.M.A.Jabbar, Adv.Mr.N.Khanjoy, Adv.Mrs.S.Das, Adv.for the respondent no.7 The Court : Ashu Tosh Dev Majumdar is the pioneer of English to Bengali and English Dictionary. He made and published the Students Favourite Dictionary (English to Bengali and English) sometimes in 1940s. Mr.Dev died on 14th October, 1943. The plaintiff no.1 was incorporated sometimes in 1945 and is an existing company within the meaning of the C...
Ghanshyam Sonkar Vs. Janki Devi Sonkar and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
ORDER SHEET GA No.569 of 2017 With APDT No.10 of 2017 GA No.397 of 2016 CS No.137 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE GHANSHYAM SONKAR Versus JANKI DEVI SONKAR & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANKAR ACHARYYA Date : 6th March, 2017. Mr.Swarnendu Ghosh, Ms.Sonal Shah, Mr.Navneet Lal, Advocates for the appellant. Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee, Sr.Advocate, Mr.Kuldip Mullick, Advocate for the respondents. The Court : Let the affidavit of service filed in Court today be kept on record. After considering the submissions made by the learned advocate for the petitioner, it appears that sufficient cause has been shown to explain the delay in filing the instant appeal and as such, the delay is condoned. By consent of the parties the appeal is treated as on days list and taken up for consideration along with the application for stay. The appeal arises out of the following order passed by the FiRs.Court on 9th January, 20...
Itc Limited Vs. The Controller of Patents and Designs and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-06-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE BEFORE: THE HONBLE JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN AID No.10 of 2016 ITC LIMITED VS. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS & ORS. For the Petitioner : Mr. S.N. Mookherjee, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ranjan Bachawat, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sayan Roy Chowdhury, Adv., Mr. Shaunak Mitra, Adv., Mr. Paritosh Sinha, Adv., Ms. Mitul Das Gupta, Adv., Ms. Sreemoyee Roy Chowdhury, Adv., Mr. K.K. Pandey, Adv., Ms. Aparna Banerjee, Adv., Mr. Debayan Ghosh, Adv., For the Respondent No.3 : Mr. Abhrajit Mitra, Sr. Adv., Ms. Rajshree Kajaria, Adv., Mr. Satadeep Bhattacharya, Adv., Ms. V. Mohini, Adv., Ms. Jasmine Malik, Adv, For the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr. Rabi Prasad Mookerjee, Adv. Heard On :09. 12.2016, 16.12.2016, 20.12.2016, 21.12.2016, 23.12.2016. Judgment On :6. h March, 2017 Soumen Sen, J.:- This is an appeal under Section 36 of the Designs Act, 2000 from a decision of the Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs on 14th June, 2016 in respect of an application f...
Manglesh Jalan Vs. Subarnarekha Trade and Tea Industries Limited and O ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
OD-34 & 35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APO33of 2015 With ACO12of 2015 MANGLESH JALAN -VsSUBARNAREKHA TRADE & TEA INDUSTRIES LIMITED & OTHERS -ANDAPO34of 2015 With ACO14of 2015 CP309of 2013 MANGLESH JALAN -VsASSAMS FERTILISERS PVT.LTD & OTHERS Appearance Mr Jishnu Saha, Sr Adv.Mr A.K.Mukherjee, Adv.Ms S. Mukherjee, Adv. for the appellant Mr Sakya Sen, Sr Adv.Ms L. Sinha, Adv. for the respondents. BEFORE: The Honble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date: March 3, 2017. The Court:- The appellant is aggrieved by the orders passed by the Company Law Board in two sets of petitions filed under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956. Both petitions have been dismissed on the ground that the matters complained of by the appellant herein pertained to past and concluded transactions in respect whereof the appellant did not lodge any contemporaneous protest. The similar but independent orders on the two petitions also recorded that the change that had been brought ab...
P.E.Gazder Fund Vs. Numazar Dorab Mehta Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-03-2017
ORDER SHEET GA2722of 2011 With ACR4of 2005 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE P.E.GAZDER FUND Versus NUMAZAR DORAB MEHTA ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date :3. d March, 2017. Appearance: Mr. Swarup Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Rajdeep Biswas, Adv. Mr. Dhruba Ghosh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dipankar Haldar, Adv. Mr. Ranjan Deb, Sr. Adv. The Court : The petitioner belongs to Zoroastrian Community. The petitioner in this application has prayed for recalling of an order dated 31st January, 2006 confirming the sale of premises No.10 Bow Street, Kolkata in favour of one Prakash Ply Centre Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Prakash). The petitioner alleged that the trustees have adopted an irregular and illegal procedure in conducting the sale and by giving misleading picture, has obtained the sale of the said property in favour of Prakash. The petitioner alleged that documents disclosed in the petition would show that prior to the confirmation of sale...
Devi Kamal Trust Estate Vs. Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Kolkata ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-02-2017
Judgement. ITAT no.181 of 2016 GA no.1067 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE Devi Kamal Trust Estate Versus Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Kolkata & ORS.BEFORE: The Honble JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date:2nd March, 2017. R.K.Biswas, Adv.Mr.R.P.Banerjee, Adv..for the Assessee. Mr.Tapas Kumar Chatterjee, Adv.S.N.Dutta, Adv..for the Revenue. Arindam Sinha, J. : This appeal is directed against order dated 16th December, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal B Bench, Kolkata in ITA no.137/KOL/2009 pertaining to assessment year 2005-06. We have heard the learned advocate for the appellant and are satisfied that the case involves the following substantial questions of law of those suggested by the appellant/assessee. i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is right in reversing the order of the CIT(A) and thereby restoring the conclusion of the assessin...
Ravindra Shyamao Wadhai and Ors. Vs. Coal India Ltd. and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE PRESENT: The Honble Mr.Justice Subrata Talukdar W.P.1064 of 2015 Ravindra Shyamao Wadhai & ORS.-vs.Coal India LTD.& ORS.For the Petitioners : Mr.Partha Ghosh For the Respondents : Mr.Alok Banerjee Mr.Nikhil Roy Heard on : 08/09/2016 & 15/09/2016 Judgement on : 01/03/2017 Subrata Talukdar, J.: In this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners are 28 in number and, according to the record, have deposited the requisite court fees. The petitioners claim to be Management Level Grade E-1 Trainees posted at different subsidiaries of the Coal India LTD.(for short CIL).The case, according to the petitioneRs.may be summarised as follows:a) That each of the petitioners was initially engaged as wage board employee under the subsidiaries of CIL and, through a process of selection became appointed as management trainee E-1 w.e.f.5th June, 2012 with CIL. b) That CIL, being a Public Secto...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›