Kolkata Court September 2016 Judgments
Rdb Industries Ltd and Anr. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise,kol ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-29-2016
ORDER SHEET WP No.584 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE RDB INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR. Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,KOLKATA-II & ORS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date : 29th September, 2016. Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Bhaskar Sen, Sr.Adv.Joydeep Kar, Sr.Adv.A.Banerjee, Sr.Adv.I.Roy, Adv.S.Banerjee, Adv.D.Choudhury, Adv.S.Choudhury, Adv.for the petitioners Mr.R.N.Das, Sr.Adv.Ms.Aishwarya Rajyashree, Adv.for the respondents The Court : The petitioner has challenged the order of adjudication of Central Excise dated January 29, 2008. Learned senior Advocate for the petitioners has submitted that the impugned order of adjudication is bad due to violation of the principles of natural justice. He has pointed out that, copies of documents relied upon in the adjudication process were not given to the petitioners in spite of requests thereof. He has referred to an order passed in the earlier writ petition filed by the petitioner ...
Tag this Judgment!T.P. Roychowdhury and Company Private Ltd. Vs. Calcutta Dock Labour Bo ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-28-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present: THE HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER & THE HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE SIDDHARTHA CHATTOPADHYAY A.P.D.No.3 of 2015 With C.S.No.303 of 2005 T.P.ROYCHOWDHURY & COMPANY PRIVATE LTD.-Vs.CALCUTTA DOCK LABOUR BOARD. For the Appellant/Defendant Advocate. : Mr.Samir Chakraborty, Senior : : : Mr.Aniruddha Ray, Advocate Mr.Nirmalya Das Gupta, Advocate Mr.Anjan Deb Sarkar, Advocate For the Respondent/Plaintiff : Mr.Arindam Mukherjee, Mr.Ashok Kumar Jena, Advocates. Heard on : 05th September, 2016 Judgment on : 28.09.2016 SIDDHARTHA CHATTOPADHYAY, J.: This instant appeal arises out of the judgment and decree dated 27th March, 2015 passed by the Learned Single Judge in C.S.No.303 of 2005. The appellant has taken several grounds in order to assail the impugned judgment. According to the appellant, the Learned Single Judge failed to appreciate the scope and purport of the provisions of the Calcutta Dock Clerical and Superviso...
Tag this Judgment!The Phosphate Company Limited Vs. Emirates Trading Agency Llc
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Honble Justice Shivakant Prasad CS No.133 of 2008 THE PHOSPHATE COMPANY LIMITED Versus EMIRATES TRADING AGENCY LLC For the plaintiff For the defendant : Mr. Ajoy Krishna Chatterjee, Sr. Adv. : Mr. A.P. Agarwalla, Adv. Mr. K. K. Thaker Mr. Avinash Kankani, Adv. Mr. Indradeep Basu, Ms. Sreenita Ghoshdastidar, Advs. Heard on :08. 9.2016 C.A.V. on :08. 9.2016 Judgment on :27. 09.2016 SHIVAKANT PRASAD, J.This is a suit for a decree for Rs. 3,73,75,000/- with interest upon judgment @ 12% per annum on account of breach of contract against the defendant. Plaint case in brief is that at all material times the plaintiff carried on and still carries on business of producing and selling Single Super Phosphate a chemical fertilizer and sulphuric acid an intermediate product from its factory at Rishra in the State of West Bengal. Bright Yellow NIGC Sulphur Crude in bulk (hereinafter referred to as the said ...
Tag this Judgment!Rjee (Decd.) Vs. Before:
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-27-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE TS11OF2013GA2761of 2016 IN THE GOODS OF: JYOTI PRAKASH BHATTACHA RJEE (DECD.) Versus BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE RANJIT KUMAR BAG Date : 27th September, 2016. Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Malay Kumar Ghosh, Sr.Advocate R.K.Mitra, Advocate S.Ghosh, Advocate S.Dhar, Advocate Indranil Karfa, Advocate for plaintiff Mr.Debdut Mukherjee, Advocate Mr.Meghajit Mukherjee, Advocate Mr.Arijit Law, Advocate Ms.P.Sharma, Advocate for petitioner The Court :-The defendant Ranjana Ghoshal has prayed for appointment of Commissioner for her examination through video conference as she is unable to come to the Court to give evidence from her residence at 2114, Crest Field Drive, San Ramon, CA 94582, United States of America. Mr.Debdut Mukherjee, learned Counsel for the defendant Ranjana Ghosal submits that the husband of the said defendant has been suffering from various ailments and has been residing in the United States of America an...
Tag this Judgment!…appellants Vs. United Bank of India and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-26-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE PRESENT: The Honble Justice Nishita Mhatre And The Honble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty APO315of 2015 WP507of 2012 United Bank of India Retirees Welfare Association & Ors. Appellants Vs. United Bank of India & Ors. Respondents with APO316of 2015 WP507of 2012 United Bank of India & Ors. Appellants Vs. United Bank of India Retirees Welfare Association & Ors. Respondents For the Appellants in APO315of 2015 and Respondents in APO316of 2015 : Mr. Lakshmi Kumar Gupta Mr. Swapan Kumar Dutta Mr. Dipankar Dasgupta For the Respondents in APO315of 2015 and Appellants in APO316of 2015 : Mr. R. N. Majumdar Mr. Sourav Chakraborty For Union of India : Mr. Vipul Kundalia Heard on :22. 08.2016 Judgment on :26. 09.2016 Nishita Mhatre, J.:1. These appeals are directed against the decision of the learned Single Judge dated 4th March, 2015 in W.P. 507 of 2012. The Appeal APO No.316 of 2015 has been filed by the United Bank of India (h...
Tag this Judgment!Amit Chowdhury Vs. Subrata Basu and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-26-2016
ORDER SHEET TS25of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE GOODS OF: Sr.SUKHA RANJAN BOSE (DECEASED) -ANDAMIT CHOWDHURY -VSSUBRATA BASU & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE RANJIT KUMAR BAG Date : 26th September, 2016. Appearance: Mr.Raja Basu Chowdhury, Adv.Mr.Debashis Saha, Adv.Ms.D.Basu, Adv.for the plaintiff. Mr.Santanu Mitra, Adv.Mr.Satadeep Bhattacharyya, Adv.for the defendant no.1. The Court : By order dated March 9, 2015, the Honble Division Bench of this Court granted permission to the plaintiff to install CCTV camera in the common area of the premises No.CJ97, Sector II, Salt Lake City, Kolkata700 091 without disturbing the defendant no.1. The plaintiff is residing in the second floor of the said premises and the defendant no.1 is residing in the ground floor of the said premises. The defendant no.1 raised objection before this Court against installation of CCTV camera in the premises by the plaintiff on the ground that the...
Tag this Judgment!Renu Agarwal and Ors. Vs. Sushila Devi Agarwal
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-23-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Civil Jurisdiction (Contempt) Original Side CC No.38 of 2014 Renu Agarwal & ORS.versus Sushila Devi Agarwal For the PetitioneRs.- Mr.M.S.Tiwari, Adv.Mr.R.K.Tiwari, Adv.For the defendants: - Mr.S.P.Sarkar, Sr.Adv.Mr.Subhadeep Sen, Adv.Mr.Bimalendu Das, Adv.Judgement On: - 23rd September, 2016 I.P.MUKERJI, J. This contempt application arises out of an order passed in an interim application in a suit. The suit was instituted in this court by the alleged trustees of the Charitable Trust, Maharshi Menhi Charitable Trust, registered as a charity under the Income Tax Act, 1961. They question, the appointment of the defendants as trustees and for appointment of a suitable person or persons as trustees. They also ask for a scheme to be framed by this Court to carry out the purposes of the trust. This suit was instituted in the year 2013. In aid in the suit an interim application was taken out by the plaintiffs asking for an order restraining the defendants ...
Tag this Judgment!Canadian Commercial Corporation Vs. Coal India Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-21-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE GA3547of 2013 With EC281of 2013 CANADIAN COMMERCIAL CORPORATION -VersusCOAL INDIA LIMITED For the Award-holder: Mr Mr Mr Mr Tilok Bose, Sr Adv., Anubhav Sinha, Adv., Shailendra Jain, Adv., T. De, Adv. For the Award-debtor: Mr Anirban Roy, Adv., Mr Soumabho Ghose, Adv., Mr Pradyot Das, Adv. Hearing concluded on: September 15, 2016. BEFORE SANJIB BANERJEE, Judge Date: September 21, 2016. SANJIB BANERJEE, J.: This should bring to an end an unsavoury episode that has done no credit to the public sector company involved herein or to the judiciary in this country. This may also be regarded as the epilogue to the judgment of March 20, 2012 by which the award-debtors petition for challenging a foreign arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was rejected on the ground of maintainability.2. The parties entered into an agreement in 1989 for the foreign company to set up a coal-e...
Tag this Judgment!Kulwant Kaur @ Kurwant Kaur Dhilon Vs. State of West Bengal and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-21-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE PRESENT: The Honble Mr.Justice Subrata Talukdar W.P.83 of 2015 Kulwant Kaur @ Kurwant Kaur Dhilon -vs.State of West Bengal & ORS.with W.P.237 of 2015 Sharmistha Ghorai -vs.State of West Bengal & ORS.with W.P.617 of 2015 Ravi Mitruka -vs.State of West Bengal & ORS.with W.P.9505(W) of 2015 Sk. Abdul Kalam -vs.State of West Bengal & ORS.with W.P.9787(W) of 2015 Saroj Kumar Das -vs.State of West Bengal & ORS.with W.P.5274(W) of 2015 Susanta Charan -vs.State of West Bengal & ORS.with W.P.522(W) of 2015 Swapan Maity -vs.State of West Bengal & ORS.with W.P.525(W) of 2015 Somnath Maity -vs.State of West Bengal & ORS.with W.P.527(W) of 2015 Manoj Kumar Bera -vs.State of West Bengal & ORS.with W.P.2404(W) of 2015 Tushar Karmakar -vs.State of West Bengal & ORS.with W.P.3077(W) of 2015 Shyamal Ghosh -vs.State of West Bengal & ORS.with W.P.7112(W) of 2015 Indrajit Ghosh -vs.State of West Bengal & ORS.with W.P.7154(W) of 20...
Tag this Judgment!Ratna Mitter Vs. State of West Bengal andors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-21-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE PRESENT: The Honble Mr.Justice Subrata Talukdar W.P.449 of 2013 Ratna Mitter -vs.State of West Bengal & with W.P.450 of 2013 Mitali Ghosh -vs.State of West Bengal & with W.P.451 of 2013 Ila Chakraborty -vs.State of West Bengal & with W.P.452 of 2013 Snigdha Singh -vs.State of West Bengal & with W.P.453 of 2013 Soma Dutta -vs.State of West Bengal & with W.P.454 of 2013 Anita Nigam -vs.State of West Bengal & with ORS.ORS.ORS.ORS.ORS.ORS.W.P.455 of 2013 Geeta Kumari Singh -vs.State of West Bengal & ORS.with W.P.456 of 2013 Krishna Bhattacharyya -vs.State of West Bengal & ORS.For the Petitioners : Mr.Saktipada Jana MRS.Ujani Pal (Samanta) For Respondent Nos.4, 5 & 6 : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Baid MRS.Arunima Lala Sengupta Heard on : 24/02/2016 Judgement on : 21/09/2016 Subrata Talukdar, J.: Since all the above noted writ petitions raise common questions of facts and law, they are taken up for hearing analogously and are b...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »