Kolkata Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)i Kolkata Vs. Messers Hooghly Mill ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-02-2016
ORDER SHEET ITA1842009 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction(income tax) ORIGINAL SIDE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-I KOLKATA Versus MESSERS HOOGHLY MILLS COMPANY LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 2nd August, 2016. Mr.M.P.Agarwalla, Adv.Appears with Mr.P.Dudharia, Adv.For appellant. Mr.J.P.Khaitan, Sr.Adv.Appears with Mr.S.Bhowmick, Adv.And Mr.S.Das, Adv., for the respondent. The Court : The subject matter of challenge in this appeal is a judgment and order dated December 26, 2008, by which the Income Tax (Appellate) Tribunal, Bench, Kolkata, dismissed ITA No.1424/Kol/2008 and ITA No.1425/Kol/2008, both preferred by the revenue, pertaining to the assessment year 2003-04. We are concerned in this appeal only with respect to the order passed by the learned Tribunal in ITA NO.1425/Kol/2008. The revenue has once again come up in appeal. The following questions were formulated on August 25, 2010 when the a...
Apollo Zipper India Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation an ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-02-2016
IN TNH HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Present :The Honble Justice Dr. Sambuddha Chakrabarti August 2, 2016 WP381of 2016 Apollo Zipper India LTD.& Anr. versus Kolkata Municipal Corporation & ORS.Mr.Utpal Basu, Senior Advocate with Mr.Soumya Majumdar, Advocate Ms.H.Chakraborty, Advocate Ms.Neelina Chatterjee, Advocate Ms.R.Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioners Ms.Nandini Mitra, Advocate with Mr.A.P.Gomes, Advocate Ms.Akriti Jain, Advocate for the private respondent Mr.Ashoke Kumar Banerjee, Senior Advocate with Mr.Barin Banerjee, Advocate Mr.Aloke Kumar Ghosh, Advocate MRS.Sima Chakraborty, Advocate Mr.D.Mondal, Advocate for the KMC Mr.Sakya Sen, Senior Advocate with Mr.Saunak Sengupta, Advocate Mr.Gaurav Khaitan, Advocate for the respondent no.8 The Court :- Heard learned Advocate for the respective parties. Parties have at least come to a consensus that the old building requires an immediate attention. The learned Advocate representing the respond...
Biswadeep Gupta Vs. Sri Dipak Kumar Sengupta
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-01-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction Original Side T.S.No.2 of 2009 In the goods of : Rama Sengupta (Deceased) And Biswadeep Gupta versus Sr.Dipak Kumar Sengupta For the Plaintiff : Mr.Purnasish Gupta, Advocate Mr.Jayanta Mukherjee, Advocate For the Defendant : Mr.Sakhya Sen, Advocate Mr.P.Saha, Advocate Mr.Bidyut Dutta, Advocate Hearing concluded on : July 18, 2016 Judgment on : August 1, 2016 DEBANGSU BASAK, J. The plaintiff has applied for grant of probate of a document claimed to be the last Will and testament of Rama Sengupta, since deceased. The testatrix had died on August 14, 2006. By her Will the testatrix has appointed the plaintiff as the executor. The plaintiff does not come within the heirs succeeding to the estate of the testatrix on intestacy succession. The brother of the testatrix being the defendant herein succeeds on intestacy succession and is opposing the grant of the probate. The probate application was directed to be treated as a ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›