Kolkata Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Srei Equipment Finance Limited Vs. Akhtar Hussain and Anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CORAM: HONBLE JUSTICE HARISH TANDON EC342015 SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED -VSAKHTAR HUSSAIN & ANR. EC462015 TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED -VSRUBU CONSTRUCTION & ANR. EC1612015 M/S INDUSIND BANK LTD. -VSMINA MONDAL & ANR. EC4722015 L&T FINANCE LIMITED -VSMOHD. RASHID & ANR. EC6172015 INDUSIND BANK LIMITED -VSTRIPTI DAS & ANR. EC6202015 INDUSIND BANK LIMITED -VSAMIT MUKHERJEE & ANR. EC6222015 INDUSIND BANK LIMITED -VSZED RAHAMAN & ANR. EC6272015 INDUSIND BANK LIMITED -VSKULBIR SINGH & ANR. EC6632015 INDUSIND BANK LIMITED -VSRAM PRAVESH ROY & ANR. EC7352015 M/S CITICORP FINANCE (INDIA) LTD. -VSSEKH ABDUL KALAM & ANR. EC7722015 TATA MOTORS FINANCE LIMITED -VSSHEW KUMAR TEWARI EC7732015 TATA MOTORS FINANCE LIMITED -VSSAFIKUL BISWAS EC7752015 TATA MOTORS FINANCE LIMITED -VSPAWAN SINGH KUMAR & ANR. EC7812015 INDUSIND BANK LIMITED -VSNATIONAL ENGINEERING CO & ANR. EC7822015 INDUSIND BANK LIMITED -VSGOCIND AUTOMOBILE...
Bijay Kumar Agarwal Vs. Narayani Devi Agarwal and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
ORDER SHEET GA No.533 of 2016 CS No.61 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE MATTER OF: BIJAY KUMAR AGARWAL Versus NARAYANI DEVI AGARWAL & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 2nd March, 2016. Appearance: Mr.Suman Dutta, Advocate...for the petitioner. Mr.Sarathi Dasgupta, Adv..for defendant nos.1,2 & 6[a].Mr.Aniruddh Poddar, Adv.Mr.Aditya Garodia, Adv..for respondent no.3. Mr.R.Kumar Kalawatia, Adv.for respondent no.5. Mr.Prabal Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Vikash Singh, Adv..for defendant no.7. Mr.Chakravorty, Adv.for defendant no.4. This application is moved by the petitioner for leave to serve the copy of the petition on various persons who are not arrayed as defendants in the suit but allegedly interfered with the possession of the receiver and therefore acted in violation of the order passed by this Court. Further order in the form of an injunction is sought restraining the respondents from interfering with egress and ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›