Kolkata Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
In the Goods of Saraj Kumar Chatterjee (Deceased) Vs. Tridib Kumar Sar ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-15-2016
In the High Court At Calcutta Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction Original Side Before GA2958of 2015 TS14of 2006 In the Goods of Saraj Kumar Chatterjee (Deceased) -Vs.Tridib Kumar Sarkar : The Honble Justice Arijit Banerjee For the petitioner : Mr.Utpal Bose, Sr.Adv.Mr.C.K. Saha, Adv.Mr.Partha Pratim Mukherjee, Adv.For the caveators : Mr.Dhruba Ghosh, Sr.Adv.Heard On : 09.09.2015, 30.11.2015, 22.12.2015, 04.01.2016, 06.01.2016, 23.08.2016, 31.08.2016, 04.10.2016 Judgment On : 15.12.2016 Arijit Banerjee, J.: (1) The present application has been filed in a proceeding for grant of probate of a Will and Testament dated 31 August, 1988 claimed to be executed by one Saraj Kumar Chatterjee who passed away on 3 September, 1988. The petitioner is one of the joint executors named in the said Will. The other executor expired during the pendency of the probate application. The main prayers made in the present application are as follows:(a) Leave be given to serve subpoena upon Sr.Partha Dutta,...
Utanka Roy Vs. Director of Income Tax, International Taxation
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-15-2016
W.P.No.369 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Utanka Roy versus Director of Income Tax, International Taxation Transfer Pricing, Kolkata & ORS.For the Petitioner : Mr.R.K.Biswas, Advocate For the Respondents : Md.Nizamuddin, Advocate Hearing concluded on Judgment on : December 1, 2016 : December 15, 2016 DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:- The petitioner has assailed an order under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Learned Advocate for the petitioner has submitted that, the petitioner was working as a marine engineer and had rendered services as such to a foreign shipping company during the assessment year 2011-2012. The petitioner had filed income tax return for such assessment year under the residential status as nonresidential Indian. He had disclosed a receipt of a remuneration of Rs.5,63,850/- in US DollaRs.The petitioner was issued an assessment order cum intimation under Section 143(1).The petitioner did not file any appeal. The petition...
Anil Kamal Singh Vs. The State of West Bengal and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-15-2016
W.P.No.93 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Anil Kamal Singh versus The State of West Bengal & ORS.For the Petitioner : Mr.S.R.Islam, Advocate For the Respondents : Md.T.M.Siddiqui, Advocate Hearing concluded on Judgment on : November 15, 2016 : December 15, 2016 DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:- The petitioner has assailed a memo dated December 30, 2010 issued by the Additional Registrar of Assurances, Kolkata. By such memo the registering authorities have treated the document presented by the petitioner for registration in respect of an immovable property as a conveyance and has demanded stamp duty in accordance with the market price of such property. Learned Advocate for the petitioner has submitted that, the petitioner had participated in a public auction of an immovable property put up for sale by the authorized officer of the State Bank of India under the provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement ...
Larica Inn Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-15-2016
W.P.No.880 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Larica Inn PVT.LTD.versus The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & ORS.For the Petitioner For the Respondent Nos.4 & 6 : Mr.Sakti Nath Mukherjee, Sr.Advocate Mr.Jaydip Kar, Sr.Advocate Mr.Nirmalya Biswas, Advocate : Mr.S.P.Mukherjee, Advocate Mr.D.Halder, Advocate For K.M.C.: Mr.A.K.Ghosh, Advocate Mr.D.Mondal, Advocate Hearing concluded on Judgment on : November 17, 2016 : December 15, 2016 DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:- The petitioners have questioned the grant of additional sanction plan dated May 3, 2011 to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 for construction of the premises. According to the petitioneRs.the fiRs.petitioner is the owner of 50% of such premises. According to the petitioners they did not give consent for obtaining the additional sanction or gave consent for construction. They have sought a declaration that, the fiRs.petitioner is the 50% owner of the roof of the building and that, the additional s...
Smt. Sandhya Basu Mallick and Anr. Vs. Sri Pramatha Nath Sen
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-15-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Honble Justice Shivakant Prasad CS No.540 of 1988 Smt. Sandhya Basu Mallick & Anr. Versus Sri Pramatha Nath Sen For the plaintiffs : Mr. Sudip Deb, Advocate For the defendant : Mr. D.C. Thakur, Advocate Mr. A. K. Mukhopadhyay, Advocate Heard on :28. 11.2016 C.A.V. on :28. 11.2016 Judgment on :15. 12.2016 Mr. Sunil Kumar Chakraborty, Advocate Mr. Shiladitya Barma, Advocate This is a suit for partition. Plaintiffs case in brief is that on 13th May, 1983 the father of the plaintiffs and the defendants Manmatha Nath Sen died intestate, leaving behind the plaintiffs and the defendant No.2 as his daughters and the defendant No.1 as his only son who was governed by Dayabhaga School of Hindu law. Smt. Kamal Rabi Sen had predeceased her husband Manmatha Nath Sen. Late Manmatha Nath Sen was the absolute owner of the immovable properties described in Annexure A and movable properties held and possessed b...
Dravya (P) Ltd. Vs. Concast Global Ltd., Aco No.206 of
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
CP No.304 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION IN THE MATTER OF: ATC LOGISTICS PVT.LTD.AND RANJIT KUMAR SAHA BEFORE: The Honble Justice SOUMEN SEN Date : 14th December 2016. Appearance: Mr.Utpal Bose, Senior Advocate Mr.Mainak Bose, Advocate Mr.Prantik Garai, Advocate Mr.Ranjit Kumar Basu, Advocate ...for the petitioner. Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Senior Advocate Mr.Samit Sanyal, Advocate ...for the Company. The petitioner has filed this winding up petition on the ground that the company has failed and neglected to discharge its debt for a sum of Rs.2 crore payable under a loan transaction. The petitioner has referred to a cheque dated April 16, 2014 drawn on Union Bank of India in favour of the Company for a sum of Rs.2 crore by way of a loan. In view of alleged failure to pay the aforesaid sum, a statutory notice was issued on 26th February, 2015. The Company replied to the statutory notice on 17th March, 2015 alleging that the Company had never taken any loan of Rs.2 ...
Pavan Kanoi and Ors. Vs. Anirudh Trade and Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-14-2016
ORDER SHEET APO No.297 of 2013 ACO No.167 of 2013 CP No.15(KOL) of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction PAVAN KANOI & ORS.Versus ANIRUDH TRADE & AGENCIES PVT.LTD.& ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 14th December, 2016. Appearance: Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Sr.Adv., Mr.Anirban Roy, Mr.Deepnath Roy Chowdhury for the appellants. Mr.P.C.Sen, Sr.Adv., Mr.Reetobroto Mitra, Adv.for respondent nos.1, 2 and 4. The demurrer application questioning the eligibility criteria of the petitioners in the application for oppression and mismanagement was allowed by the Company Law Board after giving enough opportunities to the petitioners/appellants to produce the share certificates is the subject matter of challenge in this proceeding. Initially six petitioners filed application for oppression and mismanagement. However, during the pendency of the proceeding petitioner nos.2, 4 and 6 in C.P.15(Kol) of 2009 had sought for dismissal of the petition. The said petitioners admit ...
Presidency Exports and Industries Ltd. Vs. Soumit Ranjan Jena
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-12-2016
ORDER SHEET CS No.26 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE PRESIDENCY EXPORTS & INDUSTRIES LTD.Versus SOUMIT RANJAN JENA BEFORE: The Honble JUSTICE SHIVAKANT PRASAD Date : 12th December, 2016. Appearance: Mr.Somraj Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Lokenath Chatterjee, Adv.Mr.Indradeep Basu, Adv.The Court 5.12.2016, the : In compliance Superintendent, of Suit this Courts Registry order Department, dated has reported that the vakalatnama for the defendant represented by Mr.Diwakar R. Singh has been accepted on 8.10.2015 since Clauses 9 and 10 of the Letters Patent 1865 have been repealed and in view of Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 and in view of Rule 17 Chapter 8 of the Original Side Rules, let it be so recorded. Now, the suit is taken up for ex parte hearing. Mr.Prakhash Chand Bhandari, Director of the plaintiff company has deposed in support of his case. Plaint case in brief is that the plaintiff was and is carrying on business in trading an...
M/S. Kherapati Vanijya Limited Vs. M/S. Longview Tea Co. Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-09-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Honble Justice Shivakant Prasad CS No.21 of 2011 M/S.Kherapati Vanijya Limited Versus M/S.Longview Tea Co.Limited For the plaintiff : Mr.Sailesh Mishra, Advocate For the defendant : Mr.Arindam Mukherjee, Advocate Mr.Rajarshee Dutta, Advocate Mr.A.P. Agarwal, Advocate Heard on : 21.11. 2016 C.A.V.on : 21.11.2016 Judgment on : 09.12.2016 This is a suit for money claim valued at Rs.46,57,024/-. Plaint case in brief is that at all material times the plaintiff company has been and is still carrying on non-Banking business and is a Non-Banking Financial Company registered with Reserve Bank of India. The defendant company is also carrying on various types of commercial business. The defendant company approached the plaintiff company for grant of financial assistance of a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- as Inter corporate Deposit on compound interest at the rate of 15% per annum compoundable on every 90 days. A...
Smt. Kamala Ganguli and Ors. Vs. Gouri Shankar Pal and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-09-2016
OD-6 ORDER SHEET GA3575of 2016 With CS279of 2002 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction SMT. KAMALA GANGULI & ORS.Versus GOURI SHANKAR PAL & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE RANJIT KUMAR BAG Date : 9th December, 2016. Appearance: Mr.Sabhyasachi Sen, Adv.Mr.Debdut Mukherjee, Adv.The Court: The plaintiffs / petitioners have prayed for direction upon the receiver to make payment of Rs.13,73,52.67 kept in the fixed deposit account no.0091100516952 with United Bank of India, High Court Branch to the plaintiffs / petitioneRs.The plaintiffs / petitioners have also prayed for enhancement of the amount of occupational charges of the premises in question from Rs.7,500/- per month to Rs.30,000/- per month on consideration of the present market valuation of the property in question. The plaintiffs / petitioners instituted a suit against the original defendant, Jitendranath Bose for recovery of possession of premises no.124A, Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose Road (herein aft...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »