Kolkata Court October 2016 Judgments
Shyamlal Mondal and Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-06-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Civil Jurisdiction (Contempt) Original Side CC No.130 of 2014 Connected with W.P.No.763 of 2014 Shyamlal Mondal & ORS.versus The State of West Bengal & ORS.For the petitioners:- For the Respondent No.1 and 2:- Mr.Sankashan Sarkar Ms.Saswati Chatterjee Advocates Mr.Ayan Kr. Boral Mr.Avijit Ghosh .Advocates For the KMC: Mr.Barin Banerjee Mr.Debangshu Mondal .Advocates For the Private Respondent: Mr.D.D.Basu .Advocate Judgement On: - 6th October, 2016 I.P.MUKERJI, J. This is a contempt application. It alleges violation of the order dated 2nd September, 2014 passed by this court in a writ application. It was an interim order. It restrained the private respondents who were the owners and developers from evicting the petitioneRs.who claimed to be occupants of 5, Avoy Ghosh Lane, Kolkata-4, from the premises. The cause of grievance of the writ petitioners was that while building and developing the property, the private respondents would evict them. The pr...
Tag this Judgment!Reckitt Benckiser Australia Pty. Ltd. Vs. Controller of Patents and De ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-05-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE PRESENT : THE HONBLE JUSTICE PATHERYA AID No.1 of 2010 AID No.2 of 2010 AID No.3 of 2010 RECKITT BENCKISER AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD.VERSUS CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS & ORS.For the Appellant : Mr.S.N.Mukherjee, Sr.Adv., Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee, Adv., Mr.Soumya Choudhury, Adv., Mr.Subhojit Roy, Adv., Ms.Debashri Dutta, Adv.For the Respondent No.3 : Mr.Goutam Chakraborty, Sr.Adv., Mr.Sudipto Sarkar, Sr.Adv., Mr.Sayantan Bose, Adv., Mr.Devajyoti Bhattacharya, Adv.Heard on : 07.01.2011, 21.01.2011, 04.02.2011, 10.02.2011, 25.02.2011, 08.03.2011, 04.04.2011 & 12.04.2011. Judgement on : 5th October, 2016. PATHERYA J. : AID1of 2010, AID2of 2010 and AID3of 2010 are appeals filed by the appellants from the order of the Joint Controller of Patents & Designs, the respondent no.2 dated 28th March, 2008. The said order was passed on cancellation applications filed by the respondent no.3 in respect of the appellants design nos.184135, 184...
Tag this Judgment!Sesa International Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Director General of Foreign Trade ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-05-2016
In the High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side WP1118of 2014 WP350of 2015 Sesa International LTD.& Anr. -Vs.Director General of Foreign Trade & ORS.Before For the Petitioners : The Honble Justice Arijit Banerjee : Mr.Ranjan Deb, Bar-at-Law, Mr.V.N. Dwivedi, Adv.Ms.Jayanti Char, Adv.For the Customs : Mr.R.Bharadwaj, Adv.Mr.K.K. Maiti, Adv.For the DGFT : Mr.Kausik Chandra, Sr.Adv.Mr.Ujjal Kr. Ray, Adv.Heard On : 28.08.2015, 01.10.2015, 06.05.2016 Judgment On : 05.10.2016 Arijit Banerjee, J.:- (1) The disputes in the two writ petitions under consideration arise in relation to the Foreign Trade Policy (in short the Policy) for the period 2009-14 framed in terms of Sec. 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development Regulation) Act, 1992 (in short the Act) and the procedure framed for the purpose of implementing the Policy and contained in the Handbook of Procedure (in short the Procedure).Brief background of the case:- (2) Duty Free Import Authorization (DFIA) is one of ...
Tag this Judgment!Chandramallika Suppliers Private Limited and Anr. Vs. The State of Wes ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-05-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present: THE HONBLE JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER WP No.1268 of 2015 CHANDRAMALLIKA SUPPLIERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. -VERSUSTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.For the Petitioners : Mr.Ashok Kumar Banerjee, Senior Advocate, Mr.Aniruddha Mitra, Advocate, Ms.Swati Bhattacharyya, Advocate, Mr.Aditya Poddar, Advocate, Mr.Ankit Shroff, Advocate. For the State : Mr.Jayanta Kumar Mitra, Ld. Advocate General, Mr.Ayan Banerjee, Advocate, Mr.Paritosh Kumar Sinha, Advocate, Heard on : Judgment on : 08.01.2016, 08.04.2016, 25.07.2016, 10.08.2016, 15.01.2016, 18.03.2016, 01.04.2016, 06.05.2016, 24.06.2016, 20.07.2016, 27.07.2016, 03.08.2016, 08.08.2016, 17.08.2016. 05/10/2016. Biswanath Somadder, J.: The writ petitioner no.1 is a company registered under the Companies Act and the writ petitioner no.2 is its Director. The petitioners have approached this Court praying, inter alia, for the following principal reliefs: a) A writ of a...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Binaguri Tea Company Pvt Ltd Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-04-2016
ORDER SHEET G.A.No.2250 of 2016 ITAT No.304 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE M/S BINAGURI TEA COMPANY PVT LTD Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, KOLKATA BEFORE: The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 4th October , 2016. For Appellant/Assessee : Mr.R.N.Dutta, Advocate Mrs.Sutapa Roychowdhury,Advocate For respondent/revenue: Mr.M.P.Agarwal,Advocate Mr.Vipul Kundalia,Advocate The Court: The subject matter of challenge in this appeal is a judgement and order dated 1st June, 2016 by which the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal refused to exercise jurisdiction under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, for the following reasons:The learned counsel for the Assessee reiterated the stand of the Assessee as contained in the miscellaneous application. We are of the view that jurisdiction u/s.254(2) of the Act can be exercised only to rectify an error apparent on the face of t...
Tag this Judgment!Mahesh Sunny Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Airport Authority of India
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-04-2016
ORDER SHEET AP677of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Civil Jurisdiction MAHESH SUNNY ENTERPRISES PVT.LTD.VERSUS AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 4th October, 2016. Appearance: Ms.Mr.Debdutta Sen, Adv.Mr.Siddhartha Chatterjee, Adv.Ms.Suchishmita Ghosh Chatterjee, Adv.Mr.Anup Kanti Poddar, Adv.Mr.Ayan Poddar, Adv.The Court: This is an application for appointment of an arbitrator. There is no dispute either as to the existence of the arbitral agreement or that the disputes has arisen out of the said arbitral agreement under required to be decided and resolved through arbitration. A preliminary objection has been raised with regard to the invocation of arbitration clause on the ground that the said application is premature inasmuch as the Disputes Resolution Committee is yet to decide the merits of the claim of the petitioner which is a condition precedent for invocation of the arbitration clause. It is submitted that the petitioner would ...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Jain Vs. Raj Kumar Saha and Anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-04-2016
In the High Court At Calcutta Special Jurisdiction (Contempt) Original Side CC60of 2015 Sanjay Jain -Vs.Raj Kumar Saha & Anr. Before : The Honble Justice Arijit Banerjee For the petitioner : Mr.Rajeev Kumar Jain, Adv.Ms.Reena Batth, Adv.For the contemnors : Mr.Reetobroto Mitra, Adv.Mr.S.Dasgupta, Adv.Mr.A.Gupta, Adv.Heard On 19.06.2015 : 10.04.2015, 24.04.2015, 05.06.2015, 10.07.2015, 21.07.2015, 31.07.2015, 14.08.2015, 04.09.2015, 04.12.2015, 18.02.2016, 10.06.2016, 30.06.2016, 07.08.2015 11.12.2015 19.07.2016 CAV On : 19.07.2016 Judgment On : 04.10.2016 Arijit Banerjee, J:(1) In this contempt application the petitioner alleges violation of this Courts judgment and order dated 24 December, 2014 passed in GA2865of 2013 filed in CS No.331 of 2013 (Sanjay Jain-vs.-Raj Kumar Saha & Ors.).(2) The genesis of the case lies in the making of a Bengali film called Black Mmail. The alleged contemnors (hereinafter referred to as the Sahas) appear to be carrying on, inter alia, the business of pro...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Remahay Stores Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax officer and Anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-04-2016
In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side WP62of 2015 M/S.Remahay Stores PVT.LTD.-Vs.Income Tax Officer & Anr. Before : The Honble Justice Arijit Banerjee For the Petitioner : Mr.N.K. Poddar, Sr.Adv.Mr.V.Tibrewal, Adv.Mr.R.Chatterjee, Adv.For the Respondent : Mr.Nizamuddin, Adv.Heard On 26.11.2015 : 08.05.2015, 15.12.2015, 19.07.2016 11.05.2015, 16.10.2015, 21.01.2016, 07.04.2016, 28.07.2016 & 12.08.2016 CAV On : 18.08.2016 Judgment On : 04.10.2016 Arijit Banerjee, J.:(1) The subject matter of challenge in the instant writ petition is a notice dated 31 March, 2014 issued under Sec. 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short IT Act) by the Income Tax Officer (in short ITO).Ward No.9(3) Calcutta. The impugned notice is a notice of initiation of reassessment proceedings against the petitioner company in respect of assessment year 2007-08. The short grievance of the petitioner is that the impugned notice was sought to be served on the petitioner at its ear...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›