Kolkata Court January 2016 Judgments
Raja Udyog Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Raja Food Industries
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-27-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE G.A. 2514 of 2014 With C.S. 122 of 2014 G.A. 1950 of 2014 RAJA UDYOG PVT. LTD. -VS- RAJA FOOD INDUSTRIES CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH TANDON For the Petitioner For the Respondent Judgment on Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Ranjan Bachawat, Sr. Adv., S. Bose, Adv., P.R. Sinha, Adv., Gautam Kr. Ray, Adv., Mr. Debnath Ghosh, Adv. 27/01/2016 Harish Tandon, J.: A point which is more or less settled is sought to be unsettled in the present application for revocation of the leave granted under Clause 12 and Clause 14 of the Letters Patent respectively.2. The plaintiff filed the instant suit as registered owner of the trade mark alleging the infringement and passing off and prayed for decree for perpetual injunction against the Defendant. A leave under Clause 12 was sought as the Defendant is carrying on the business outside the jurisdiction of this Court. Such leave was granted. A further leave under Clause 14 of the Letters...
Tag this Judgment!Mbd Airport Hotel). Vs. 4 Industrial Tribunal and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-27-2016
WP No.1733 of 2003 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.HOTEL AIRPORT ASHOK [KNOWN AS KOLKATA HOTEL PVT.LTD.MBD Airport Hotel).VERSUS th 4 INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL & ORS.BEFORE: The Honble Justice DEBANGSU BASAK Dated, the 27th January, 2016. Appearance: Mr.D.Ghosh, Adv.Mr.R.De, Adv.For the petitioner. The Court:-The challenge in the present writ petition is directed towards order No.71 dated June 16, 2003 passed by the 4th Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal. According to the petitioner, the order of the Tribunal is perverse. The Tribunal ought not to have directed setting aside the order of dismissal. Reliance has been placed on a judgement reported in 1972 Vol.1 Labour Law Journal, page 180 (Delhi Cloth & General Mills Company LTD.And- Ludh Budh Singh) in support of such contention. None appears for the respondent. An order passed by the Industrial Tribunal is under challenge in the present Writ Petition. The order is reasoned. It deals with the v...
Tag this Judgment!Icici Prudential Mutual Fund and Anr. Vs. Income Tax office, Ward8(1), ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-21-2016
OD-1 WP No.1025 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ICICI PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUND & ANR. Versus INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD-8(1).KOLKATA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 21st January, 2016. Appearance: Mr.J.P Khaitan, Sr.Adv.Mr.Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Adv.Mr.P.K. Jhunjhunwala, Adv.Mr.S.Rudra, Adv.Mr.R.Bharadwaj, Adv.Mr.O.P. Dubey, Adv.The Court : The question is of some importance. An income tax officer has issued a notice under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the fiRs.petitioner mutual fund. The notice of July 15, 2015 claims that since a sum of Rs.4,92,93,215/- is due on account of income tax and the like from the proforma respondent assessee, the fiRs.petitioner should pay to me forthwith any amount due from you to or, held by you, for or on account of the said assessee up to the amount of arrears. It is the case of the petitioners that the fiRs.petitioner does not really hold any money for or on account of the profo...
Tag this Judgment!Eastern Coalfields Ltd and Anr. Vs. Somal Pipes Pvt Ltd
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-21-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE GA No.16 of 2016 APOT No.1 of 2016 GA No.2093 of 2008 GA No.3815 of 2015 WP No.2068 of 2005 EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD & ANR. Versus SOMAL PIPES PVT LTD BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL The Hon'ble JUSTICE MIR DARA SHEKO Date : 21st January, 2016. Mr.Aloke Banerjee, Adv.Mr.Aniruddha Mitra, Adv.Mr.S.M. Odaidullah, Adv.Partho Basu,Advocate Mr.Nikhil Roy, Adv.Appellant. Mr.Siddhartha Mitra, Sr.Adv.Mr.M.Hossain,Advocate Mr.Swaraj Shaw,Advocate Ms.Titash Mukherjee,Advocate Ms.Suruchi Khenteta,Advocate Respondent. Soumitra Pal, J:- This appeal has been preferred by Eastern Coalfields LTD.and its General Manager (S&M).the appellant nos.1 and 2, respectively, against the order dated 22nd December, 2015 passed in G.A.No.3815 of 2015 with W.P.No.2068 of 2005 (Somal Pipes Pvt.Ltd.v.Coal India LTD.& Ors.) principally on the ground that since the writ petition was finally disposed of by order dated 1st October, 2015, (for ...
Tag this Judgment!Tapas Kumar Datta Vs. Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur and Or ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-20-2016
ORDER SHEET WP No.403 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE TAPAS KUMAR DATTA Versus INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, KHARAGPUR & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date : 20th January, 2016. Mr.Tapas Kr. Dutta appears in person Mr.R.N.Majumdar, Mr.Sourav Chakraborty, Mr.Supratim Bhattacharjee, Adversus for the respondent The Court : The petitioner appears in person and seeks relief with regard to the thesis submitted by him with the respondent No.1. According to the petitioner he had submitted a thesis for consideration by the authorities. He had given the clarification sought for. He ought to have been called for a viva voce interview. He was not called for such viva voce interview. The refusal to call for the interview is not in accordance to the regulations governing the grant of a Ph.D.decree by the respondent No.1. According to the petitioner, the thesis was submitted in 1997. A clarification was sought for which he clarif...
Tag this Judgment!Bharat Coking Coal Limited and Anr. Vs. Puskar Mal Dokania and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-19-2016
APO No.174 of 2014 WP No.989 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED & ANR. Versus PUSKAR MAL DOKANIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.MANJULA CHELLUR AND The Hon'ble JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI Date: 19th January, 2016 Appearance Mr.Saptangshu Basu, Adv.with Mr.Aniruddha Mitra, Adv.Mr.Nikhil Roy, Adv.Ms.Veeneta Meharia, Adv.with Mr.Amit Kumar Nag, Adv.Mr.Piyush Agarwal, Adv.Heard learned Counsel for the appellants as well as respondents. The respondents before us were the writ petitioners who approached the learned Single Judge challenging the report of the committee dated 6.9.2010 formed by the Coal India Limited in pursuance of the order passed by I.P.Mukerji, J. in the year 2010. It is not in dispute that the respondents-writ petitioners carry on business of operating metallurgical coke oven units and for the purpose of running their business they required Non-Linked Washery coking coal (NLW) of a certai...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Tata Korf Engineering Services Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Ta ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-19-2016
ORDER SHEET ITA NO.331 OF2005IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION(INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.TATA KORF ENGINEERING SERVICES LTD.Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA - I & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASHA ARORA Date : 19th January, 2016. MR.J.P.KHAITAN,SENIOR ADVOCATE, MS.NILANJANA BANERJEE(PAL).ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT MR.S.B.SARAF, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS The Court : The appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 1st April, 2005 passed by the learned Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, D Bench pertaining to the assessment year 199192. Aggrieved by the order of the learned Tribunal the assessee has come up in appeal. At the time of admission, the following questions were formulated:i].Whether in view of the fact that the assessment having been reopened after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, in the absence of any finding or belief stated in the recorded reasons that the Asse...
Tag this Judgment!Samarendra Nath Bhattacharjee Vs. State Bank of India and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-15-2016
1 In the High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side WP366of 2015 Samarendra Nath Bhattacharjee -Vs.State Bank of India & ORS.Before : The Honble Justice Arijit Banerjee For the Petitioner : Mr.Kumar Gupta, Adv.Mr.Rajesh Gupta, Adv.Ms.Micky Chowdhury, Adv.Mr.Rohit Jalan, Adv.Mr.R.K. Jalan, Adv.For the Respondent : Mr.S.Banerjee, Adv.Mr.H.C.Yadav, Adv.Mr.Chandan Kr. Lal, Adv.Heard On : 08/04/2015, 20/04/2015, 12/05/2015 04/08/2015 06/08/2015, 13/08/2015, 20/08/2015, 04/09/2015 14/09/2015 CAV On : 13/10/2015 Judgment On : 15/01/2016 Arijit Banerjee, J.:- (1) In the instant writ petition the petitioner challenges the notices dated 2nd January, 2015 and 14th March, 2015 issued by the respondent Bank under Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short SARFAESI Act) in respect of flat No.2, Block-KB10 Sector-III, Salt Lake, Kolkata 700098 (hereinafter referred to as the said Flat)....
Tag this Judgment!Akriti Vyapaar Private Limited and Ors. Vs. The Kolkata Municipal Corp ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-15-2016
In The High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side WP908of 2015 Akriti Vyapaar Private Limited & ORS.-Vs.The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & ORS.Before : The Honble Justice Arijit Banerjee For the Petitioners : Mr.Anindya Kr. Mitra, Sr.Adv.Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Sr.Adv.Mr.Sarbapriya Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Soumya Roy Chowdhury, Adv.Ms.Radhika Singh, Adv.For the Respondents : Mr.Biswajit Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Arijit Dey, Adv.Heard On : 21/09/2015 & 30/09/2015 CAV On : 05/10/2015 Judgment On : 15/01/2016 Arijit Banerjee, J.: (1) The undisputed facts of the case are as follows. (2) The petitioners Nos.1 to 8 all being Private Limited Companies, are the owners of premises No.224, Briji East Kolkata, measuring approximately 49 cottahs equivalent to 3283.91 Sq. MeteRs.(hereinafter referred to as the said premises).The petitioner No.9 is a director of the petitioners Nos.1 to 8. (3) On 9th June, 2013, a notification under Section 7(3) of the Metro Railways (Construction of Works) ...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Basanti Gang Vs. Mr. Debajyoti Boral, the District Inspector
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-15-2016
CC122of 2015 WP601of 2014 GA2851of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Contempt) ORIGINAL SIDE SMT. BASANTI GANG Versus Mr.DEBAJYOTI BORAL, THE DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS, SECONDARY EDUCATION (S.E.) BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER Date : 15th January, 2016. For the petitioner : Mr.Nilanjana Adhya,Advocate For the alleged contemnor : Mr.Sadananda Ganguly,Advocate Mr.Shamim Ul Bari,Advocate The Court : -When the contempt application is taken up for consideration, learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State submits that he is being led by the learned Additional Advocate General. He also handsover a cheque dated 15th January, 2016 amounting to Rs.7,81,180/-, which appears to have been issued by the Government of West Bengal, PF Deposit Account at Kolkata, PAO-II in favour of Savitri Pathshala, HS. The cheque appears to bear two illegible signatures with two rubber stamps affixed at the bottom. One of the rubber stamps read District In...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »