Kolkata Court September 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shree Padmawati Metaliks Pvt Ltd. Vs. State Bank of India.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-01-2015
ORDER SHEET GA1329of 2015 With CS77of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SHREE PADMAWATI METALIKS PVT LTD.Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 1st September, 2015. Mr.Anirban Roy, Adv.Mr.M.Chowdhury,Adv.Mr.R.C.Prusti, Adv.Mr.J.N.Manna, Adv.Ms.Priyanka Mishra, Adv.The Court: This is an application for rejection of the plaint. The basis of the application appears to be that subsequent to the filing of the suit by the constituent, the defendant bank on the basis of an order passed by this Court on 29th August, 2014 in the pending matter has instituted proceeding before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institution Act, 1993 for recovery of the money to the constituent and by reason thereof the suit filed by the plaintiff either should be rejected as transferred to the Debts Recovery Tribunal as the claim made in the suit is in the nature of...
M/S. the Statesman Limited Vs. M/S. Europcell Gmbh
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-01-2015
GA No.2887 of 2015 APOT No.400 of 2015 EC No.615 of 2014 GA No.2478 of 2015 GA No.2479 of 2015 APOT No.330 of 2015 EC No.615 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.THE STATESMAN LIMITED Versus M/S.EUROPCELL GMBH BEFORE: The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.MANJULA CHELLUR AND The Hon'ble JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI Date: 1st September, 2015 Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Sr.Adv.with Mr.Sarvapriya Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.S.R. Saha, Adv..for the appellant/defendant Mr.Sabyasachi Chowdhury, Adv.with Mr.S.E. Huda, Adv..for the respondent/plaintiff The Court : The delay of 36 delays in preferring the appeal is condoned. The application for condonation of delay is disposed of. The money claim was raised against the appellant herein by the respondent/defendant in respect of nine invoices raised for supply of goods. The claim raised by the plaintiff under the invoices in Indian equivalent amount was about Rs.91.53 lacs. It is also not in dispute that initial decree was for US$...
Land and Bricks and Entertainments Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Kolkata Municipal ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-01-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Present : The Honble Justice Dr. Sambuddha Chakrabarti September 1, 2015 WP849of 2015 Land & Bricks & Entertainments LTD.& Anr. versus Kolkata Municipal Corporation & ORS.Mr.Suvadeep Sen, Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Aloke Kumar Ghosh, Advocate with Mr.Dilip Chatterjee, Advocate Mr.Gopal Chandra Das, Advocate Mr.D.Mondal, Advocate for the KMC The Court :- Heard learned Advocate for the petitioners and Mr.Ghosh, learned Advocate for the respondents. Mr.Ghosh has produced in Court an order dated August 5/6, 2015 issued by the respondent no.5. Let the same be kept with the record. By this writ petition the petitioners have, inter alia, prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus declaring the annual valuation of the concerned premises to be without jurisdiction and being contrary to the Scheme of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act ( The Act, for short).a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respond...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›