Kolkata Court July 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Arati Addy and Ors. Vs. Smt. Namita Das and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-06-2015
ORDER SHEET EOS No.32 of 1987 GA No.2080 of 2015 GA No.829 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SMT. ARATI ADDY & ORS.Versus SMT. NAMITA DAS & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 6th July, 2015. The Court : Mr.Rajarshee Dutta, Adv.for defendant No.24 Mr.Amritam Mondal, Adv.for defendant No.12 Mr.Meghnad Dutta, Adv.for defendant No.3 Mr.Ramesh Sharma, Adv.learned Receiver Mr.Avirup Chatterjee, Adv.for bidder in 73, Chetla Road Mr.Soumen Das, Adv.for the intending purchaser Panchanan Chakraborty Mr.Subhra Nag, Adv.for highest bidder as bargadars of agricultural lands Mr.Dipak Kr. Mookerji, Adv.for the purchaser Mr.Dutta, learned Advocate appears on behalf of defendant No.24 and presses for confirmation of sale of properties made by learned Receiver as per, in particular, report dated 6th May, 2015. The defendant No.3 has taken out an application being G.A.2080 of 2015 taking exception to the said report. Included in tha...
C.I.T Centralii, Kolkata Vs. Balarampur Chini Mills Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-02-2015
FORM NO.J.IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) Original Side Present : Honble Justice Girish Chandra Gupta And Honble Justice Arindam Sinha ITA176of 2009 With ITA678of 2008 C.I.T Central-II, Kolkata versus Balarampur Chini Mills LTD.Md.Nizamuddin, Adv for the appellant Mr.S.K.Kapoor, Senior Advocate with Mr.J.P.Khaitan, Senior Advocate Mr.Sanjoy Bhowmick, Advocate for the respondent Hearing concluded on: 09.06.2015 Judgment delivered on:02.07.2015 GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA, J.:- The subject matter of challenge in the appeal is a judgment and order dated 18th January, 2008 pertaining to the Assessment Year 2003-04 and Assessment Year 2004-05 by which the learned Tribunal agreeing with the CIT (Appeals) dismissed the appeal preferred by Revenue. Aggrieved by the order revenue has come up in appeal. The following question of law was formulated at the time of admission of the appeal registered as ITA678of 2008: W hether on the facts and in the circumstances of the cas...
Niranjan Lal Todi Vs. Nandalal Todi and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE A.P.O.No.269 of 2014 A.P.O.T.No.334 of 2014 G.A.No.2427 of 2014 With A.P.No.483 of 2010 In the matter of: Niranjan Lal Todi versus Nandalal Todi and ORS.And A.P.O.No.271 of 2014 A.P.O.T.No.335 of 2014 G.A.No.2426 of 2014 With A.P.No.1121 of 2013 In the matter of: Niranjan Lal Todi versus Nandalal Todi and ORS.BEFORE: The Honble Justice INDIRA BANERJEE And The Honble Justice SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI For the appellant : Mr.Joy Saha, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr.Samit Talukdar, Senior Advocate. Heard on :15.06.2015, 29.06.2015, 30.06.2015 Judgment on : 01.07.2015 INDIRA BANERJEE, J. : This appeal is against a judgment and order dated 15th May, 2014 passed by the learned Single Bench dismissing the applications being A.P.No.483 of 2010 and A.P.No.1121 of 2013 for inter alia termination of the mandate of the learned arbitrator, Mr.R.K.Chowdhury, to arbitrate the disputes between the appellant and the respondents. On or ...
Srei Equipment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mohammad Asif Habibi and Anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
OD-48 AP No.460 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SREI EQUIPMENT PVT.LTD.Versus MOHAMMAD ASIF HABIBI & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 1st July, 2015. Appearance: Mr.S.Banerjee, Adv.Mr.Arik Banerjee, Adv.The Court : This is a post-award petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The award has been challenged by the borrower, primarily on the ground that the arbitral reference was held without notice to the borrower. The parties have been before this Court on previous occasions. Upon a previous petition under Section 9 of the said Act being disposed of to the dissatisfaction of the finance company, an appeal was carried from the relevant order. Such appeal was disposed of on November 18, 2014 by the order impugned being substantially modified as follows: We are, thus, left with the balance 15 excavators and/or tippers that are lying with the respondents. Mr.Banerjee would contend,...
M/S. Prakash Roadlines Corporation Vs. Coal India Limited and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-01-2015
OD11AP223of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.PRAKASH ROADLINES CORPORATION Versus COAL INDIA LIMITED & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 1st July, 2015. For the petitioner : Mr.Rohit Das,Advocate Ms.Ashapurna Roy,Advocate Mr.Gaurav Talukdar,Advocate Mr.Aniruddha Mitra,Advocate appeaRs.The Court : - The fiRs.and third respondents are unnecessary parties and have been needlessly impleaded. Since the fiRs.and third respondents are not parties to the arbitration agreement cited by the petitioner, the names of the fiRs.and third respondents are deleted from the array of parties. This is a request under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 consequent upon the petitioners invocation of the arbitration agreement by its letter of March 9,2012 going unheeded despite due receipt thereof by the respondent and the appointing authority named in the arbitration agreement. The claim pertains to transporta...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›