Court : Kolkata
APDT No.15 of 2015 GA No.1569 of 2015 CS No.126 of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE CESC LIMITED Versus THREE CHEERS ENTERTAINMENTS PVT.LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.MANJULA CHELLUR The Hon'ble JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI Date : 29th June, 2015. For Appellant : Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Jayanta Kr. Mitra, Sr.Advocate Joydeep Kar, Sr.Advocate Dhruba Ghosh, Advocate, Debraj Bhattacharya, Advocate Rishav Dutt, Advocate and Amarnath Ghosh, Advocate For Respondent Nos.1&2: Mr.Sandip Bhattacharyya, Advocate Mr.Rajesh Sen, Advocate Mr.Rajmohan Chattaraj, Advocate, Mr.Suman Basu, Advocate and Ms.Debolina Chatterjee, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Mr.Sabyasachi Roychowdhury, Advocate Mr.Mainak Ganguly, Advocate The Court : Though a separate application is not filed for condonation of delay of 27 days, in the appeal itself, such prayer was sought. We have gone through the contents of the appeal. We are of the opinion that delay deserves to be condoned...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
OD-79 GA No.2030 of 2015 AP No.174 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD.Versus M/S.R.PIYARELALL IMPORT & EXPORT LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 29th June, 2015. Appearance: Mr.T.K. Majumdar, Adv.Mr.P.K. Chakraborty, Adv.Mr.K.Chatterjee, Adv.The Court : Sufficient grounds have been made out as to why the petitioner was not represented on June 22, 2015 when AP No.174 of 2015 was dismissed for default. The order dated June 22, 2015 is recalled and AP No.174 of 2015 is restored to the file. The restoration application, GA No.2030 of 2015, is allowed as above but without any order as to costs. Since the parties are represented, the petition is taken up for immediate consideration. A point of limitation has been urged on behalf of the respondent. The admitted position on the basis of the averments in the petition is as follows: (i) The corrected awar...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
AP No.1677 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION TONGANAGAON TEA COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED -VersusM/S ASSOCIATED TEA INDUSTRIES For the Petitioner: Mr Ratnanko Banerji, Sr Adv., Ms Rangabati Sen, Adv., Mr Sanjay Jhunjhunwala, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr Mr Mr Mr Ranjan Bachawat, Sr Adv., Debnath Ghosh, Adv., Shounak Sengupta, Adv., Rajesh Upadhaya, Adv. Heard on: June 25, 2015. BEFORE SANJIB BANERJEE, Judge Date: June 26, 2015. SANJIB BANERJEE, J.: The challenge to the arbitral award in the present proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is primarily on the ground that the arbitrator did not take into account the material before him that the claim of the respondent herein stood satisfied upon the supply of tea effected by the petitioner company.2. The facts as are relevant for the present purpose may be culled out from the impugned award of July 4, 2014. The parties apparently entered into an agreement on April 1, 2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE CA No.906 of 2010 With CP No.2 of 1987 TA125of 2013 CA No.26 of 2014 CA No.309 of 2013 CA No.321 of 2013 CA No.324 of 2014 CA No.358 of 2013 CA No.388 of 2013 CA No.39 of 2013 CA No.513 of 2013 CA No.59 of 2013 CA No.99 of 2014 CA No.901 of 2010 CA No.577 of 2010 CA No.641 of 2009 CA No.126 of 2005 CA No.740 of 2005 CA No.302 of 2005 CA No.303 of 2005 CA No.587 of 2010 CA No.370of 2009 CA No.957 of 2010 CC111of 2015 RE: THE BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC AND BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC MAZDOOR SANGH (BMs.Versus DAMODAR PRASAD BHATTAR & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA Date : 26th June, 2015. Mr.S.N.Mitra, Sr.Adv., Mr.D.N. Sharma, Adv.and Mr.S.Ganguly, Mr.S.Sarkar, Advs.for Yashdeep Trexim PVT.LTD.MRS.Manju Agarwal with Mr.Bajrang Menot, Adv.for unsecured creditors Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, Adv.with Mr.Rajesh Updhyay, Adv.and Mr.Arka Banerjee, Adv.for the Union Mr.S.K.Mal, Adv.with M...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
ORDER SHEET CA401of 2013 With CP90of 1983 CA342of 1998 CA431of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE RE: ANGELO BROTHERS (IN LIQN.) Versus RE: NAWDEEP SINGH VSTHE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, AND ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE Date : 24th June, 2015. Appearance: Mr.Deepak Khosla, Adv..for the Applicant. Mr.V.Raja Rao, Adv.Mr.Huzefa, Adv.Mr.A.Rao, Adv..for Punjab & Sind Bank Mr.Y.P.Das, Adv.Miss.D.Dutta, Adv.representing Canara Bank, Circle Office, Kolkata. Mr.S.C.Prasad, Advocate..for the Official Liquidator. The Court:-In couRs.of hearing today, Mr.S.C.Prasad, learned Advocate appearing for the Official Liquidator submitted that altogether five claims were lodged in respect of the company, the claimants being 589 individuals claiming to be the workers of the company, the Employees Provident Fund Organization, Jhalda Municipality and a Firm by the name of Calcutta Wax TradeRs.There is an additional claim of one Premankur Ghosal, 55/27/16, Purba...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE G.A.No.1803 of 2015 A.P.O.T.No.230 of 2015 With A.P.No.208 of 2015 JMS MINING SERVICES PVT.LTD.Versus DCS LTD.-AndG.A.No.1805 of 2015 A.P.O.T.No.231 of 2015 With A.P.No.209 of 2015 JMS MINING SERVICES PVT.LTD.Versus DCS LTD.-AndG.A.No.1807 of 2015 A.P.O.T.No.232 of 2015 With A.P.No.210 of 2015 JMS MINING SERVICES PVT.LTD.Versus DCS LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE -AndThe Hon'ble JUSTICE SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI Date : 24th June, 2015. For Appellants : Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Sr.Adv.with Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, Mr.Soumabha Ghose, Mr.Sandip Dasgupta & Mr.Ravitej Chilumuri, Adversus For Respondents : Mr.Dhruba Ghosh with Mr.Sarathi Dasgupta, Mr.Dipendra Nath Chunder & Mr.Arijit Basu, Adversus These appeals being A.P.O.T.No.230/ 2015, A.P.O.T.No.231/ 2015 and A.P.O.T.No.232/ 2015 are against three several ad-interim orders dated 1st April, 2015 passed by the learned Single Judge, restraining the appellant...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
ORDER SHEET APO3212014 WO8512013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE PRABHAT KUMAR CHAKRAVARTY Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE NISHITA MHATRE The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASHA ARORA Date : 22nd June, 2015. Mr.Subir Sanyal, Advocate Mr.Sutirtha Das, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Arijit Chaudhuri, Senior Advocate Mr.A.K.Banerjee, Advocate Mr.A.Sarkar, Advocate for the RBI. The Court : The appellant has challenged the order passed by the learned Single Judge on 23rd April, 2014 dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant herein. The appellant was employed with the Reserve Bank of India. He was directed to attend the training couRs.in Chennai which order he failed to comply. The appellant was thereafter charge-sheeted and an enquiry was initiated against him. The appellant appeared and defended himself at the enquiry. On 10th March, 2006 the appellant, for reasons best known to him, decided to abstain from the enquiry. In ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side WP1249of 2014 With GA1478of 2015 TA23of 2015 Manikuntala Sarkar -vs.The Asiatic Society Before For the petitioner : The Honble Justice Arijit Banerjee : Mr.J.Kar, Sr.Adv.Mr.S.Majumdar, Adv Mr.P Chatterjee, Adv.For the respondent : Mr.P Chatterjee, Sr.Adv.Mr.R Bachawat, Sr.Adv.Mr.A Roy, Adv.Ms.S.Basu Mullick, Adv.Heard On : 31/03/2015, 02/04/2015, 08/04/2015 22/04/2015, 29/04/2015, 05/05/2015, 08/05/2015 and 12/05/2015 Judgment On : 19/06/2015 Arijit Banerjee, J.: (1) In this writ petition the petitioner challenges the order dated 19th September, 2012 issued by the respondents whereby the respondents decided not to extend the service of the petitioner. The essence of the petitioners case is as follows. (2) The petitioner joined the respondent society as Telephone- cum-Receptionist in the year 1981. From time to time she was promoted and from 6th January, 1998 held the post of Administrative Officer. She was sen...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side WP299of 2015 M/s Shyam Steel Industries & Anr. -Vs.- Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Durgapur Div-I & ORS.Before : The Honble Justice Arijit Banerjee For the Petitioner : Mr.Shounak Mitra, Adv.For the Respondent : Mr.P.K. Roy, Adv.Mr.K.K. Maiti, Adv Heard On : 11/5/15, 14/5/15, 4/6/15 & 11/6/15 CAV On : 11/06/15 Judgment on : 19/06/2015 Arijit Banerjee, J.: (1) In this writ petition, the petitioner prays for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to allow clearance of excisable goods manufactured/to be manufactured by the petitioners under provisional assessment in terms of Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The facts of the case, in brief are as follows. (2) The petitioner company is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of, inter alia, MS Billets and TMT BaRs.The TMT Bars cleared from the companys factory are either supplied directly to the cus...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side WP285of 2015 Utpal Bakshi -Vs.The Registrar General, High Court, Calcutta & ORS.Before : The Honble Justice Mr.Arijit Banerjee For the Petitioner : Mr.Anjan Bhattacharjee, Adv.Mr.Aniruddha Sarkar, Adv.Mr.Tandra Dutta, Adv.For the Respondent : Siddhartha Banerjee, Adv.Heard on : 14/05/15 & 02/06/15 CAV On : 09/06/15 Judgment on : 19/06/2015 Arijit Banerjee, J.: (1) In the instant writ petition the petitioner challenges an order dated 20th January, 2015 issued by the Registrar General, Calcutta High Court, whereby the petitioner was reverted back from the post of Assistant Court Officer to the post of Stenographer Grade A with effect from 26th February, 2014. The case of the petitioner in short is as follows. (2) The petitioner was appointed as Stenographer under Grade C with effect from 20th November, 2000 after he passed the shorthand test and typing test conducted by the Recruitment Committee of the Calcutta ...
Tag this Judgment!