Kolkata Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India and Ors Vs. Joydev Ghatak
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
ORDER SHEET APO No.200 of 2014 WP No.121 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE UNION OF INDIA & ORS Versus JOYDEV GHATAK BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE SAMAPTI CHATTERJEE Date : 2nd March, 2015. Appearance: Mr.Ashok Chakraborty, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Arindam Chattopadhyay, ld. Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Anjan Bhattacharya, ld. Advocate for the respondent. The Court :- The facts of this case would relate to an allegation of illegal gratification for which the respondent was charged with. The facts would depict, the respondent was working as a Railway Inspector while he was charged with the above allegation. The Railway handed over the case to the CBI, who initiated criminal proceeding as against the respondent. The respondent would claim, he was honorably acquitted by the criminal Court. CBI would, however, not agree with such decision and has preferred an appeal being CRA No.260 of 2007 (CBI versus Joydev Ghatak) th...
Acknit Industries Limited and Ors Vs. The Kolkata Municipal Corporatio ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE APO No.24 of 2015 G.A.No.268 of 2015 W.P.No.74 of 2009 ACKNIT INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ORS Versus THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY The Hon'ble JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA Date : 2nd March, 2015. Ms.Sutapa Sanyal, Adv.Mr.Ashis Kr. Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Susil Kr. Sewak, Adv.For the appellants Mr.Biswajit Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Gopal Chandra Das, Adv.Mr.Debangsu Mondal, Adv.For the Respondents The Court : This application has been filed in connection with an appeal whereby a learned Judge of this Court disposed of the writ petition upon holding that the same is not maintainable in the Original Side jurisdiction of this Court as one of the respondents is outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Original Side of this Court. This Court considering the earlier decisions of this Court specifically held that the writ application filed in the Original Side jurisdic...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›