Kolkata Court October 2015 Judgments
Saurabh Ghosal Vs. Smt. Anupama Roy Choudhury
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
In The High Court At Calcutta Testamentary And Intestate Jurisdiction Original Side TS3of 2008 PLA206of 1999 In the Goods of: Pratibha Sundari Devi, Deceased And In the Matter of: Saurabh Ghosal -Vs.Smt. Anupama Roy Choudhury And EOPLA1of 2013 Arising Out of: OS5of 2000 In the Goods of: Pratibha Sundari Devi, Deceased And In the Matter of: Dipendu Kumar Roy Chowdhury -Vs.Sukhendu Roy Chowdhury & ORS.Before : The Honble Justice Arijit Banerjee For the Plaintiffs : Mr.Reetobroto Mitra, Adv.Ms.Nilanjana Adhya, Adv.Ms.DebORS.Dutta, Adv.Heard on : 22/07/2015 & 29/07/2015 CAV On : 29/07/2015 Judgment On : 16/10/2015 Arijit Banerjee, J.: (1) The present proceedings concern two Wills of Lt. Pratibha Sundari Devi. She died on 10th June, 1998. (2) The two Wills alleged to have been executed by the said deceased have surfaced after her demise. One is a Will dated 16th June, 1996. The other is a Will dated 8th April, 1997. (3) The executor named in the Will dated 16th June, 1996 filed an applicati...
Tag this Judgment!Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd. Vs. Standard Chartered Bank
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side Present: The Honble Justice Arindam Sinha C.S. No.38 of 2000 Heavy Engineering Corporation Ltd. Vs. Standard Chartered Bank For the plaintiff : Mr. Suhrid Roy Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Reetobrata Mitra, Adv. Ms. Bithika Mandal, Adv. For the Defendant no.1 : Mr. K.V. Viswanathan, Adv. Mr. K Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. S.N. Bera, Adv. For the Defendant no.2 : Mr. P.K. Drolia, Adv. Heard on :02. 07.2015, 15.07.2015, 21.07.2015, 29.07.2015, 13.08.2015, 31.08.2015 & 10.09.2015. Judgment on :16. h October, 2015. Arindam Sinha, J.The plaintiff had claimed, inter alia, decree for Rs.1,10,33,207/-. The plaint was amended thrice pursuant to orders dated 13th September, 2001, 31st July, 2007 and 19th February, 2008. The first two amendments were with regard to the name of the defendant no.1. By the third amendment the defendant no.2 was added. Trial of suit was commenced with the following issues being framed by another Learned Ju...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Kanti Devi Bhutoria and Ors. Vs. Smt. Srila Dutta and Anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-16-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BEFORE: The Honble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN C.S. No.451 of 1989 With C.S. 348 of 1991 SMT. KANTI DEVI BHUTORIA & ORS. VS. SMT. SRILA DUTTA & ANR. For the Plaintiff : Mr. S.P. Sarkar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arindam Mukherjee, Mr. Dipankar Ghosh. For the Defendant : Mr. Raja Basu Chowdhury, Mr. Partha Bose, Mr. B. Biswas, Mr. Sudhakar Prasad, Mr. Pradipta Bose. Heard On :28. 07.2015, 07.08.2015, 21.08.2015, 28.08.2015, 04.09.2015 Judgment On :16. h October, 2015 Soumen Sen, J.:- The suit filed by the original plaintiff for recovery of possession and the suit filed by the original defendant for specific performance of an oral agreement are taken up together and disposed of by this common judgement and order. The learned Counsels for the parties have consented of the hearing of both the suits together since there is no disagreement amongst the parties that the decree in one suit would non-suit the plaintiff in the other suit....
Tag this Judgment!The Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors. Vs. Asha Murarka and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
ORDER SHEET GA NO.2194 OF2015WITH APO NO.245 OF2015WP NO.814 OF2012IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.Versus ASHA MURARKA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHIB SADHAN SADHU Date : 15th October, 2015. MR.ALAK KR.GHOSH, MR.BISWAJIT MUKHERJEE, MR.DEBANGSHU MONDAL, MISS PIYALI SENGUPTA, ADVOCATES FOR APPELLANTS MR.N.K.PODDAR,SR.ADVOCATE, MR.V.TIBREWAL,ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS The Court : The subject matter of challenge in the appeal is a judgment and order dated 24th April, 2015 by which the learned Trial Court held as follows: Consequently, a flat would also come within the meaning of building used in Sections 171(5) and 178(5 of the Act of 1980. Such an interpretation would be harmonious, and would not lead to an absurdity or an abnormality. This interpretation would also extend the benefit of Sections 171(5) and 178(5) of the Act of 1980 to the individual flat owneRs.w...
Tag this Judgment!Mr. Goutam De Vs. Uco Bank and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
In The High Court At Calcutta Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side WP314of 2015 Mr.Goutam De -Vs.UCO Bank & ORS.Before : The Honble Justice Arijit Banerjee For the petitioner : Mrs.N.Banerjee, Adv.Mr.S.Chakraborti, Adv.For the respondent : Mr.Pankaj Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Samrat Mukherjee, Adv.MRS.Ledia Dasgupta, Adv.Heard On 07/09/2015 : CAV On : 14/09/2015 Judgment On : 15/10/2015 04/05/2015, 19/06/2015, 21/06/2015, & 14/09/2015 Arijit Banerjee, J.: (1) The Government of India in the budget of 2009-10 had introduced the Central Scheme for Interest Subsidy (in short CSIS Scheme) on educational loan to provide interest subsidy on all educational loans sanctioned/availed up to 31st March, 2009 and outstanding as on 31st December, 2013 by students belong to economically weaker section. The Scheme was applicable for Post Class XII studies in recognized technical/professional courses in India. Students with an annual gross parental/family income up to Rs.4.5 lac per year as on the...
Tag this Judgment!Essjay Ericsson Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dilip Kumar Khandelwal
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE G.A.No.2475 of 2015 G.A.No.3353 of 2015 A.P.D.T.No.29 of 2015 C.S.No.372 of 2014 Essjay Ericsson PVT.LTD.versus Dilip Kumar Khandelwal B E F O R E: The Honble Justice INDIRA BANERJEE And The Honble Justice SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI For the Appellant : Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Samit Talukdar, Senior Advocate, Dhruba Ghosh, Advocate, Satadeep Bhattacharya, Advocate, Saunak Mitra, Advocate, Sonia Sharma, Advocate, Uttam Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Senior Advocate, Pranit Bag, Advocate, Soumabho Ghose, Advocate, Swati Agarwal, Advocate, N.Roy, Advocate. Heard on Judgment on : 01.09.2015, 15.09.2015, 16.09.2015, 29.09.2015 : 15.10.2015. INDIRA BANERJEE, J.: This appeal is against a final judgment and decree dated 16 th July, 2015, passed by the Honble Single Bench, in favour of the plaintiff respondent inter alia for khas, peaceful and vacant possession of premises No.5, Commissariat Road, Ko...
Tag this Judgment!Abhishek Bose and Ors. Vs. Idbi Bank Ltd. and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-15-2015
In The High Court At Calcutta Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side GA2247of 2014 CS262of 2014 Abhishek Bose & ORS.-Vs.IDBI Bank LTD.& ORS.Before : The Honble Justice Arijit Banerjee For the Petitioners : Mr.Debnath Ghosh, Adv.Mr.Indranil Karfa, Adv.Mr.Jayanta Sengupta, Adv.For the Respondents : Mr.Amiya Kumar Sur, Adv.Mr.Biplab Ghosh, Adv.Heard On 03/09/2014 : 22/05/2014, 21/08/2014, 27/08/2014, 12/09/2014, 24/09/2014, 26/09/2014, 27/02/2015, 17/04/2015, 05/05/2015, 20/02/2015 12/05/2015 CAV On : 05/06/2015 Judgment On : 15/10/2015 Arijit Banerjee, J.: (1) In the above suit, the plaintiffs/petitioners have claimed, inter alia, declaration that a deed of mortgage dated 31st May, 2013 executed by the plaintiffs in favour of the defendant Nos.1 and 2 as also a personal guarantee dated 1st February, 2013 executed by the plaintiff No.1 in favour of the defendant Nos.1, 2 and 3 are null and void and for consequential reliefs of delivery up and cancellation of the said documents...
Tag this Judgment!Iic Container Line(S) Pte Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-14-2015
ORDER SHEET WP No.112 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IIC CONTAINER LINE(S) PTE LTD.& ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 14th October, 2015. Mr.R.K. Chowdhary, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Ms.Mamta Bhargav, Mr.Subir Kr. Saha, Advocates for respondent no.3. Mr.Nilay Sengupta, Mr.S.Bhattacharyya, Advocates for KoPT. The Court : The petitioners claim to be engaged in the business of container line services. The petitioner no.1 is the principal and the petitioner no.2 its agent. Detention of eight of their containers and claim arising as a consequence thereof is the subject matter of the writ petition. The petitioners have claimed a sum of Rs.1,19,06,933/- from the allegedly wrongfully detaining their containers which Customs Authorities for resulted in the said sum lost by the petitioners having been deprived of the use of the same. They have also claimed refund of a sum of Rs.8,94,972/- on...
Tag this Judgment!Neycer India Limited Vs. Gmb Ceramics Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-14-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Honble Justice Sambuddha Chakrabarti G.A.No.4026 of 2000 Award Case No.32 of 2000 Neycer India Limited versus GMB Ceramics Limited For the petitioners : Mr.Gautam Chakraborty, Sr.Advocate Mr.Ritabrata Mitra, Advocate Mr.P.Sinhav, Advocate Mr.Sumit Dhar, Advocate Mr.Indranil Karfa, Advocate For the respondent Nos.: Mr.Ranjan Deb, Sr.Advocate Mr.Pramit Kumar Roy, Sr.Advocate MRS.Suparna Mukherjee, Advocate Mr.Shaunak Ghosh, Advocate Mr.Avirup Mondal, Advocate Heard on : 14.07.2015, 22.07.2015, 30.07.2015, 05.08.2015, 12.08.2015, 18.08.2015, 21.08.2015, 08.09.2015 Judgement on : 14.10.2015 Sambuddha Chakrabarti, J.: 16.07.2015, 23.07.2015, 31.07.2015, 06.08.2015, 13.08.2015, 19.08.2015, 24.08.2015, 17.07.2015, 24.07.2015, 03.08.2015, 10.08.2015, 14.08.2015, 20.08.2015, 25.08.2015, 21.07.2015, 27.07.2015, 04.08.2015, 11.08.2015, 17.08.2015, 21.08.2015, 01.09.2015, Neycer India Limited, i.e., the p...
Tag this Judgment!Apollo Zipper India Ltd. Vs. W. Newman and Co. Limited.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-14-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA BEFORE: Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE The Honble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN GA No.2408 of 2012 CS No.201 of 2012 Apollo Zipper India LTD.Versus W. Newman & Co.Limited. For the Plaintiff : Mr.Jishnu Saha, Mr.Hashnuhana Chakraborty, Mr.Anna Malhotra For the Defendant : Mr.Pratap Kr. Chatterjee, Sr.Adv., Mr.Tilak Kr. Bose, Mr.Raj Ratan Sen, Mr.A.R.Gomes, Ms.A.Jain. Heard On : 14.08.2014, 21.08.2014, 03.03.2015, 24.03.2015, 28.04.2015, 09.06.2015, 16.06.2015, 07.07.2015, 04.08.2015, 13.08.2015, 25.08.2015, 08.09.2015, 15.09.2015,19.09.2015, 29.09.2015. Judgment On : 14th October, 2015 Soumen Sen, J.:- This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Chapter 13A of the Rules on the Original Side of this Court for summary eviction of the defendant from premises no.18 Hemanta Basu Sarani previously known as 1, 2 & 3 Old Court House Street, Calcutta 700069. The plaintiff claims to be the owner of the property in question. The plaintiff sued the def...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »