Kolkata Court August 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Guiness Securities Limited Vs. Devang Dilip Vyas and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-04-2014
GA No.2407 of 2014 WITH CS277of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE GUINESS SECURITIES LIMITED Versus DEVANG DILIP VYAS & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 4th August, 2014. For the plaintiff : Mr.Sourav Mukherjee,Advocate Mr.Chandra Sekhar Jha,Advocate Mr.Radhamohan Ray,Advocate Mr.Agniswar Chowdhury,Advocate For the defendant Nos.1 & 2 : Mr.Jishnu Choudhury,Advocate Mr.Arif Ali,Advocate Mr.Amit Agarwalla,Advocate Ms.Debangana Deb Roy,Advocate The Court : - The plaintiff has filed this application for stay of the arbitration proceeding pending before the learned Arbitrators of the Bombay Stock Exchange of India LTD.The defendant No.1 made a reference to the Bombay Stock Exchange of India LTD.under the relevant rules, bye-laws and regulations of the said Exchange in order to resolve a dispute arising out of transactions that had taken place between the defendant No.1 as a client and the plaintiff as a broker. The present application for stay of the arbitrat...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolii Vs. the General Fibre Dealer(P) Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-04-2014
ORDER SHEET G.A.No.1504 of 2014 ITAT49of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income-tax) ORIGINAL SIDE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOL-II Versus THE GENERAL FIBRE DEALER(P) LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 4th August, 2014. For Appellant : Md.Nizamudin, Adv.For Respondent : Mr.Debasish Mitra, Adv.The Court : Heard Md.Nizamuddin, learned advocate for the appellant moving the application being G.A.No.1504 of 2014 and Mr.Mitra, learned Advocate for the respondent. Since we find that the records contain the Memorandum of Appeal, application and also other documents which are necessary for disposal of the appeal, let the matter be treated as ready for hearing and come up under the heading For Hearing on 11th August, 2014 on the following questions :- 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Ld. Tribunal has erred in law in holding that the Cess on green leaf amounting to Rs.3 lakh is an allowab...
Guiness Securities Limited Vs. Geeta Dilip Vyas and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-04-2014
GA No.2408 of 2014 WITH CS278of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE GUINESS SECURITIES LIMITED Versus GEETA DILIP VYAS & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 4th August, 2014. For the plaintiff : Mr.Sourav Mukherjee,Advocate Mr.Chandra Sekhar Jha,Advocate Mr.Radhamohan Ray,Advocate Mr.Agniswar Chowdhury,Advocate For the defendant Nos.1 & 2 : Mr.Jishnu Choudhury,Advocate Mr.Arif Ali,Advocate Mr.Amit Agarwalla,Advocate Ms.Debangana Deb Roy,Advocate The Court : - The plaintiff has filed this application for stay of the arbitration proceeding pending before the learned Arbitrators of the Bombay Stock Exchange of India LTD.The defendant No.1 made a reference to the Bombay Stock Exchange of India LTD.under the relevant rules, bye-laws and regulations of the said Exchange in order to resolve a dispute arising out of transactions that had taken place between the defendant No.1 as a client and the plaintiff as a broker. The present application for stay of the arbitrati...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkataii Vs. M/S. M.K.Shah Exports Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-04-2014
ORDER SHEET G.A.No.1703 of 2014 ITAT58of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income-tax) ORIGINAL SIDE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-II Versus M/S.M.K.SHAH EXPORTS LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 4th August, 2014. The Court : Heard learned advocate for the appellant moving the application being G.A.No.364 of 2013 and Mr.Khaitan, learned Senior Advocate for the respondent. Since we find that the records contain the Memorandum of Appeal, application and also other documents which are necessary for disposal of the appeal, let the matter be treated as ready for hearing and come up under the heading For Hearing on 25th August, 2014 on the following questions :- 1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in law in holding that blending and mixing of Tea amount to manufacturing and produced and was eligible for exemption under section 10B of the Income T...
Srei Equipment Finance Ltd Vs. M/S. Maave Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and an ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
AP No.606 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LTD Versus M/S.MAAVE ELECTRONICS PVT.LTD.AND ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : August 1, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Utpal Bose, Adv.Mr.Kaushik Chatterjee, Adv.Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, Adv.Mr.Chayan Gupta, Adv.The Court : The respondents are represented and it is submitted on behalf of the second respondent that the second respondent should not have been impleaded herein since the obligations of the second respondent flow from a separate agreement and not from the agreement which has been invoked herein. It is the petitioners submission that the second respondent is recognised as the guarantor in the parent finance agreement and notwithstanding a separate document having been executed by the petitioner and the second respondent, the second respondent is also governed by the obligations under the parent agreement. Since the issue can be raised in couRs.of ...
Corporation Limited Vs. MaeksIn Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
AP No.172 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE CENTRAL INLAND WATER TRANSPORT CORPORATION LIMITED -VersusMAEKSIN SHIPPING Co.PVT.LTD.Appearance: Mr.Arindam Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.A.K.Jena, Adv.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : August 1, 2014. The Court : The respondent is not represented even at the second call. The grievance of the petitioner is that a ship owned by the petitioner has been sent for repairs to be conducted by the respondent pursuant to a tender process, but the respondent has neither been able to complete the repair nor does it appear that the respondent is capable of completing the work. On this petition an order was made on February 14, 2014 requiring the Central Vigilance Commission to enquire into the circumstances leading to the identification of the respondent to undertake the work that the petitioner claims now that the respondent is completely incapable of performing. Understandably, at the behest ...
Valhalla Marine Sarl Vs. the Owners and Parties Interested in the
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
ORDER SHEET GA No.2409 of 2014 AS No.13 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Admiralty Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE VALHALLA MARINE SARL Versus THE OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL M.V.FREE HERO BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 1st August, 2014. Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Tilok Bose, Sr.Adv.Subhojit Roy, Adv.Anubhav Sinha, Adv.Rohit Mukherji, Adv.for plaintiff The Court : The maritime claim in this suit arises on account of bunker supplied. Hence the money claim. The case of the plaintiff is that bunkers were supplied by it to vessel M.V.Free Neptune and M.V.Free Hero. Delivery note dated 6th May, 2014 evidences supply of bunkers and receipt thereof by the Master/Chief Engineer of the subject vessel. Invoice was also raised and as no payment was forthcoming, proceedings were initiated to arrest vessel M.V.Free Neptune and vessel M.V.Free Hero, in the 1st Maritime Court at Panama where the owners of vessel M.V.Free Neptune appeared and submitted that they were the owners of vessel...
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
ORDER SHEET CP No.493 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE KARAM CHAND THAPAR AND BROS.(COAL SALES) LTD.-ANDINDICo.ENTERPRISES LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 1st August, 2014. Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee, Sr.Adv., Mr.D.N. Sharma, Ms.Rusha Saha for the applicant. Mr.Santanu Kr. Mitra for the Central Government. The Court : Two objections have been raised by the Central Government. The fiRs.is with regard to treatment of accounts in cases of demerger. According to the objector no specific accounting standard or guideline has been laid down by the Institute of Chartered Accountant of India but in cases of demerger certain accounting standards have been followed. Let the said accounting standard be followed by the applicant as is applicable in cases of demerger. In view of the aforesaid the fiRs.objection raised by the Central Government stands satisfied. The second objection raised relates to transfer of purchase consideration to the demerged...
Sadhan Kumar Ray and ors. Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
ORDER SHEET GA No.1479 of 2013 WITH CS No.57 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SADHAN KUMAR RAY & ORS.Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 1st August, 2014. Appearance : Mr.Jishnu Chaudhury, Adv.Mr.Arif Ali, Adv.The Court: The defendant is not represented despite the matter having appeared in the warning list. No affidavit-in-opposition has been filed though the directions in such regard were issued on July 24, 2013. The suit is for a money decree in excess of Rs.58 lakh in respect of a property at Auckland Place that was in the possession of the defendant till possession was surrendered on or about June 15, 2012. The present interlocutory petition is for judgment on admission on the basis of the admitted documents appearing at pages 30, 31 and 34 of the petition; being the letter of possession of June 15, 2012, an intimation by the defendant on February 15, 2010 that fair rent of the p...
Nitai Chand Manna Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
ORDER SHEET WP No.676 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE NITAI CHAND MANNA Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA Date: 1st August, 2014 Ms.Rina Banerjee , Advocate ..for the petitioner Ms.Tapati Samanta, Advocate ..for the respondents The petitioner was a panel advocate of the State of West Bengal since 1996 till May, 2011. He is aggrieved because the bills raised by him for professional services rendered have not been cleared. I have heard learned advocates for the parties. It is not in dispute that the petitioner had been an empanelled advocate for nearly 15 yeaRs.In my considered view, the office of the Legal Remembrancer owes a duty to look into the bills that have been raised by the petitioner and to say, for good reasons, to what extent he is not entitled to the fees charged by him and to release such quantum of payment to the petitioner, as are found to be admissible. That would necessarily ...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »