Kolkata Court August 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Price Waterhouse and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkataxix a ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
ORDER SHEET WP No.733 OF2014IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE PRICE WATERHOUSE & ANR. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-XIX & ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 7th August, 2014. Mr.S.Pal, senior advocate, Mr.D.Kundu, senior advocate, Mr.I.Nandi, Mr.D.P.Samantafor petitioneRs.Mr.R.N.Bandyopadhya, Mr.P.Dudhoriafor respondents. The Court : The fiRs.writ petitioner is a firm of Chartered Accountants and AuditORS.the second writ petitioner being its partner. A question of limitation is raised with regard to a notice to the fiRs.writ petitioner under Section 142[1].of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which is dated 4th April, 2014, followed by another letter/notice dated 4th June, 2014, for the assessment year 2011-2012. Latest, this notice, it is contended, ought to have been issued and served by 31st March, 2014. Otherwise, the proceedings become non est in the eyes of law. However, there is a reference in the notice that a repre...
Devvrat Gupta and ors. Vs. Shyam Saran Gupta and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
ORDER SHEET GA2488of 2013 With CS271of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE DEVVRAT GUPTA & ORS.Versus SHYAM SARAN GUPTA & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE Date : 7th August, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Kuldeep Mallick, Adv..for the petitioneRs.Mr.Nirmalya Dasgupta, Adv.Mr.Dibanath Dey, Adv..fo the defendants. The Court: It appears from the records that interim order in terms of prayers (c) and (d) of the notice of motion was fiRs.passed on 22nd August, 2013. Such order was passed ex parte almost one year ago. The said order was extended from time to time and finally stood extended till further orders by this Courts order dated 17th April, 2014. The plaintiffs attempt to serve the defendants having failed, substituted service by way of paper publication was directed by this Court by its order dated 28th September, 2013. Such publication was made. The defendants appeared and obtained direction for filing affidavit. Today learned ...
Vs. Chaitainya Alloys Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
ORDER SHEET CS231of 2013 GA No.3326 of 2013 GA No.3331 of 2013 GA3337of 2013 GA3367of 2013 GA3374of 2013 GA No.3366 of 2013 GA No.3346 of 2013 GA No.3352 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Oridinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BENGAL INDIA GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED Versus CHAITAINYA ALLOYS PVT.LTD.& ORS.-ANDCS No.232 of 2013 GA No.3328 of 2013 GA No.3332 of 2013 GA No.3338 of 2013 GA No.3369 of 2013 GA No.3375 of 2013 GA No.3365 of 2013 GA No.3347 of 2013 GA No.3353 of 2013 BENGAL INDIA GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.-VSGOURI IRON AND STEEL (PVT.) LTD.AND ORS.-ANDCS No.233 of 2013 GA No.3330 of 2013 GA No.333 of 2013 GA No.3339 of 2013 GA3370of 2013 GA3376of 2013 GA3364of 2013 GA3348of 2013 GA No.3354 of 2013 BENGAL INDIA GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED -VSSUBHLABH STEELS PVT.LTD.AND ORS.-AND- CS No.234 of 2013 GA No.3325 of 2013 GA No.3334 of 2013 GA No.3340 of 2013 GA No.3371 of 2013 GA No.3377 of 2013 GA No.3363 of 2013 GA No.3349 of 2013 GA No.3355 of 2013 BENGAL INDI...
Re: Union of India Vs. Official Liquidator
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE APO96OF2014WITH CP84of 2013 RE: TYRE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.(NOW IN LIQN) AND RE: UNION OF INDIA -VERSUSOFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR BEFORE: The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.MANJULA CHELLUR The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE Date : 7th August, 2014. Mr.Bhaskar Prasad Banerjee, Advocate ..for Union of India Mr.Ranjit Chowdhury, Advocate ..for respondent 1/O.L.Mr.Anuj Singh, Advocate for supporting creditor(Machinery Agency) Mr.Susanta Dutta, Advocate Mr.Gora Chand Roychowdhury, Advocate ..for workeRs.Tyre Corporation of India. The Court :- The appellant Union of India through the Ministry of Heavy Industry, Public Enterprises Department approached us by filing the instant appeal as against the order of winding up passed by the learned Single Judge when the company was unable to pay the debts of the unsecured creditORS.We are told by Mr.Partha Basu, learned Advocate that a sum of Rs.7 crore and odd would be due and paya...
Royal Calcutta Golf Club and anr. Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation an ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
APOT3392014 GA21362014 WP5762014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE ROYAL CALCUTTA GOLF CLUB & ANR. Versus KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.MANJULA CHELLUR The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE Date : 7th August, 2014. For Appellants : Mr.Anindya Kr. Mitra, Sr.Advocate Mr.Pratap Chatterjee, Sr.Advocate Mr.Ratnanko Banerji, Sr.Advocate Mr.Subrata Basu, Advocate Mr.S.Dutta, Advocate Mr.A.Deb, Advocate For KMC : Mr.Ashok Kr. Banerji, Addl. Advocate General Mr.Biswajit Mukherjee, Advocate Mr.Abhijit Dey, Advocate The Court : This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated July 9, 2014, passed by the Learned Single Judge in W.P.No.576 of 2014. The gist of the facts that led to the filing of the present appeal is as under. The appellant Club is aggrieved by the reassessment of annual valuation for the period 1st quarter 2000-01 in respect of premises no.18, Golf Club Road, Ward no.94, Kolkata-33. They have fur...
Shri Debdulal Maity Vs. National Insruance Co. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
ORDER SHEET WP No.459 of 2014 WITH GA No.1856 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SHRI DEBDULAL MAITY Versus NATIONAL INSRUANCE Co.LTD.& ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date : 7th August, 2014. Appearance : Mr.Debojoyti Basu, Adv.Mr.Arunava Ganguly, Adv.for the petitioner Mr.Avijit Gangopadhyay, Sr.Adv.Mr.Supriya Dubey, Adv.for the respondent No.1 Mr.Utpal Bose, Sr.Adv.Mr.Arindam Ghosh, Adv.for the respondent No.6 The Court : The writ petitioner challenges a notice dated May 14, 2014 issued by the Internal Complaints Committee set up under the Sexual Harassment of Woman at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. The impugned notice is issued by the Internal Complaints Committee on the basis of a complaint made by the respondent No.6 in her letter dated May 5, 2014 addressed to the Presiding Officer of the Internal Complaints Committee. None of the appearing respondents wants to file any affidavit. Init...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkataiv, Kolkata Vs. M/S. Adhunik Infras ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
ORDER SHEET G.A.No.1337 of 2014 ITAT28of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata-IV, Kolkata Versus M/S.Adhunik Infrastructures Private Limited BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 7th August, 2014. Appearance : Mr.P.Dudhuria,Advocate The Court : Let the appeal be admitted. Let the appeal be heard on the following questions : i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law to allow the appeal of the assessee on the issue of disallowance under Section 80-1A of the said Act despite the fact that the assessee has no discretion in the work to be done and has merely acted as an Agent/Contract or of the PWD for completing the work as per the specifications given. ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law to allow the claim of deduction made under Section 80-1A of the sai...
Birendra Nath Saha Vs. Smt. Chandana Saha and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
ORDER SHEET GA1211of 2013 With CS296of 1997 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BIRENDRA NATH SAHA VERSUS SMT. CHANDANA SAHA & ORS.BEFORE: The Honble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE Date: 7th August, 2014 Appearance: Ms.Sutapa Sanyal, Adv..for the petitioner Mr.Kashinath Dey, Adv.Mr.Sandip Kr. Dey, Adv..for the respondents. The Court: This is a suit for partition which is pending since 1997. The subject matter of the suit is premises no.34/1A, 34/1B and 35, APC Road, Calcutta. Some of the co-owners are in possession /occupation of some portions of the said premises. The other portions are occupied by outsiders who are really shopkeepeRs.A bazzar is being run from the said premises. By an order dated 17th June, 2013, Patherya, J.appointed the Commissioner of Partition as Receiver to administer and manage the said premises. By an order dated 23rd July, 2013, Patherya, J.recorded that the Receiver visited the said premises and tried to make inventory o...
incorporated Daub Verhoeven Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Senior Joint Commiss ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
ORDER SHEET W.P.No.939 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE INCORPORATED DAUB VERHOEVEN LTD.& ANR. Versus THE SENIOR JOINT COMMISSIONER,COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOLKATA SOUTH CIRCLE & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 7th August, 2014. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Bharadwaj, Adv.For Respondents : Mr.Abhratosh Majumdar with Mr.Pithu Dudharia, Adversus With regard to the transaction connected with the West Bengal Sales Tax Act/VAT, the petitioner approached the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal, which by its order dated 13th March, 2014 directed the Board to hear out the case of the petitioners with documents. This writ petition is concerned with transactions arising out of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. In a similar case, the Board, by an order dated 30th April, 2013, dismissed the application of the writ petitioners for revision. Mr.Bharadwaj, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.has been able to substantiate that relevant documents were ...
incorporated Daub Verhoeven Ltd. and anr. Vs. Sales Tax Officer, Bhawa ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
ORDER SHEET W.P.No.26 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE INCORPORATED DAUB VERHOEVEN LTD.& ANR. Versus SALES TAX OFFICER, BHAWANIPORE CHARGE & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 7th August, 2014. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Bharadwaj, Adv.For Respondents : Mr.Abhratosh Majumdar with Mr.Pithu Dudharia, Adversus With regard to the transaction connected with the West Bengal Sales Tax Act/VAT, the petitioner approached the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal, which by its order dated 13th March, 2014 directed the Board to hear out the case of the petitioners with documents. This writ petition is concerned with transactions arising out of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. In a similar case, the Board, by an order dated 30th April, 2013, dismissed the application of the writ petitioners for revision. Mr.Bharadwaj, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.has been able to substantiate that relevant documents were seized by the Central Excise Dep...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »