Kolkata Court July 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
ORDER SHEET CA NO.654 OF2007CP NO.553 OF1999IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE MATTER OF : BHARAT MARGARINE LTD.(IN LIQN) AND SAS INVESTMENTS FIDUCIARY LTD.AND THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, HIGH COURT, CALCUTTA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 28th July, 2014. Mr.Ranjan Bachwat, Sr.Advocate, Mr.Deepnath Roy Chowdhury, Mr.S.Roychowdhury Advocates.for contributories. Mr.S.S. Kolay, Advocates for WBSEB. Mr.B.Mohanty, Mrs.Ruma Sikdar, Advcatesfor Official Liquidator The Court :-This day the licensing company has appeared through counsel. It is submitted that a sum of Rs.3,35,900/- is due and payable on account of arrears by the company (in liquidation).Accordingly, let the bill evidencing the period for which such payment is to be made be sent by the counsel for the licensing company to the office of the Official Liquidator. Counsel for the contributories of the company (in liquidation) submits that TS No.338 of 2014 has been filed before the 6th...
Dr. Pushpita Sahu(Basu) Vs. Mr. Khalil Ahmed and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
CC No.56 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Contempt) ORIGINAL SIDE DR. PUSHPITA SAHU(BASU) Versus Mr.KHALIL AHMED & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 28th July, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Sudip Deb, Adv..for the petitioner Mr.Prabal Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Debanjan Mukherjee, Adv..for the private respondent Mr.Pranab Kumar Dutta, Adv.Ms.Piyali Sengupta, Adv.Ms.Suvasree Ghose, Adv..for KMC The Court : Since the special officers report reveals that the tenanted portion has not been found open on any of the 48 occasions that the special officer visited the premises without notice to any person, it does not appear that any business is being carried on therefrom. It is also submitted on behalf of the Municipal Commissioner that men and agents of the Corporation have also found the tenanted premises to be closed each time visits were made. Though the petitioner insists that it was only after the institution of the contempt petition that the business was cl...
Eva Seth Vs. Bank of Maharashtra
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
ORDER CS No.270 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction EVA SETH Versus BANK OF MAHARASHTRA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date:28. h July 2014. Appearance: Mr. Sudip Ghosh, Advocate Mr. S. S. Bhutoria, Advocate ...for the plaintiff. Mr. Ranjan Deb, Senior Advocate Ms. Aruna Ghosh, Advocate ...for the defendant. The Court: part. The examination-in-chief of DW1 is held in The suit is adjourned till 4th August 2014 for further examination. Since the original documents have been produced on behalf of the defendant bank, the formal objections recorded in relation to the following documents during cross-examination of the plaintiffs witness stand withdrawn. Sl. No.Date of document 1. 09.11.1990 Exhibit Number (Original) 50(1) Exhibit Number Nature of Document (Photocopy) 50 Plaintiff request letter Rs. 2,16,000/- 2. 09.11.1990 51(1) 51 Plaintiff letter of proprietorship Rs. 2,16,000/- 3. 09.11.1990 52(1) 52 Promissory note by Enterprise for Rs. 2,1...
Srei Equipment Finance Ltd. Vs. Sas Infra Projects (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
AP No.195 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LTD.Versus SAS INFRA PROJECTS (INDIA) PVT.LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 28th July, 2014. Appearance: Mr.S.Banerjee, Adv.Mr.Dwaipayan Basu Mallick, Adv.Mr.Soumya Roy, Adv.The Court : The respondent is represented and it is submitted that a substantial payment would be made in a short time to ward off the receiver taking possession of the assets covered by the agreement. The receiver has taken possession of two of the 19 assets, but has not been able to take possession of the other assets since he was indisposed. The petitioner claims that a sum in excess of Rs.1.44 crore is due only on account of defaulted instalments. The receiver is directed to proceed to take possession of the remaining assets after a week from date. If, however, within a week from date, a sum of Rs.50 lakh is paid by way of demand drafts or bankers cheques or like instrum...
L and T Finance Limited Vs. Bek Transport Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE AP No.1079 of 2014 L & T FINANCE LIMITED -VersusBEK TRANSPORT PVT.LTD.& ANR. AP No.1080 of 2014 L & T FINANCE LIMITED -VersusBEK TRANSPORT PVT.LTD.& ANR. AP No.1081 of 2014 L & T FINANCE LIMITED -VersusBEK TRANSPORT PVT.LTD.& ANR. AP No.1083 of 2014 L & T FINANCE LIMITED -VersusBEK TRANSPORT PVT.LTD.& ANR. AP No.1084 of 2014 L & T FINANCE LIMITED -VersusBEK TRANSPORT PVT.LTD.& ANR. AP No.1085 of 2014 L & T FINANCE LIMITED -VersusBEK TRANSPORT PVT.LTD.& ANR. AP No.1087 of 2014 L & T FINANCE LIMITED -VersusBEK TRANSPORT PVT.LTD.& ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : July 28, 2014. The Court : The respondents are not represented despite previous service. Since the parties are the same, all these matters have been taken up together. The petitioner claims that a total amount in excess of Rs.2.89 crore is due upon the termination of the seven agreements, including an amount in excess of Rs.1.3...
L and T Finance Limited Vs. Blue Sharks Autoworks Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
AP No.1501 of 2013 AP No.180 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE L & T FINANCE LIMITED Versus BLUE SHARKS AUTO-WORKS PVT.LTD.& ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 28th July, 2014. Appearance: Mr.J.Chowdhury, Adv.Mr.D.K. Samanta, Adv.Mr.M.M. Roy, Adv.The Court : The petitioner says that the assets covered by the agreements have been located in Jalpaiguri but the receivers will require police assistance to take possession thereof. The respondents are represented but no payment has been forthcoming despite the matter having been adjourned previously. A sum in excess of Rs.1.40 crore remains due only on account of defaulted instalments in respect of these two matteRs.The receivers are directed to take possession of the assets covered by the agreements with police assistance, if necessary. The Superintendent of Police exercising jurisdiction over the area should render the requisite assistance upon the receivers writte...
Smt. Kamsundari Devi Vs. Kumar Kapileshwar Singh
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
GA No.3541 of 2013 GA No.3151 of 2007 ATA No.18 of 1963 with GA No.234 of 2014 GA No.60 of 2014 PLA No.18 of 1963 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION In the matter of: Smt. Kamsundari Devi Versus Kumar Kapileshwar Singh And In the matter of: Darshan Alliance Agro Industries LTD.Before: The Hon'ble Justice I.P.MUKERJ.Date: 28th July 2014 Appearance: Mr.Surajit Nath Mitra, Sr.Advocate Mr.Debjyoti Datta, Advocate MRS.Vijaya Bhatia, Advocate Mr.Ganesh Prasad Shaw, Advocate Mrs.S.Agarwal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Ahin Choudhuri, Sr.Advocate Mr.Ashish Chakraborty, Advocate Mr.Souvik Majundar, Advocate Ms.Tannistha Lahiri, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr.Sounak Mitra, Advocate Mr.S.Kundu, Advocate appear Mr.S.Seni, Advocate Mr.Mainak Bose, Advocate Mr.M.Raheman, Advocate appear Mr.S.Talukdar, Sr.Advocate Mr.Sakya Sen, Advocate appear The Court: There are divergent interests involved in this litigation. The committee of management represented by Mr.Ahin Cho...
Lalan Paswan Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
ORDER SHEET GA No.2200 of 2014 GA No.2201 of 2014 APOT No.352 of 2014 WP No.511 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE LALAN PASWAN Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY AND The Hon'ble JUSTICE SAMAPTI CHATTERJEE Date: 28th July, 2014 Ms.Bharati Chatterjee, Adv..for the appellant Mr.Arindam Chatterjee, Adv.with Ms.Tatini Sengupta, Adv..for the respondents Ref: G.A.No.2200 of 2014 This application has been filed for condoning the delay in preferring the appeal. Having heard the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the respective parties and considering the averments made in this application, we are satisfied that sufficient reasons have been furnished and adequate grounds have been mentioned in this application for condoning the delay in preferring the appeal. Therefore, the delay in preferring the appeal is condoned. The department is directed to register the appeal, if the same is otherwise in fo...
Durgapur Monolithics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. West Bengal State Financial Corpn. ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
ORDER SHEET CA No.432 of 2014 CP No.275 of 1990 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE HIND REFRACTORIES LTD.(IN LIQN.) AND DURGAPUR MONOLITHICS PVT.LTD.VS WEST BENGAL STATE FINANCIAL CORPN. & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 28th July, 2014. Mr.S.N.Mukherjee, Sr.Adv.Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee,Sr.Adv.for the petitioner Mr.Joydip Mukherjee, Adv.for official lilquidator The Court : By this application the petitioner herein seeks a modification of order dated 1st December, 1999 by grant of liberty to the West Bengal State Financial Corporation to assign a leasehold right in the land of the company (in liquidation) to the purchaser. Hind Refractories LTD.was wound up by order dated 1st December, 1991 and its assets were taken possession of by the official liquidator. One of the assets of the company (in liquidation) was a leasehold interest in a land situated in Mouza : Gopinathpur, Thana Durgapur, District Burdwan. The said lease was executed between...
Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia Commissionerate Vs. M/S. Univer ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Central Excise].ORIGINAL SIDE GA No.2069 of 2014 CEXA No.7 of 2014 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HALDIA COMMISSIONERATE Versus M/S.UNIVERSAL PAPER MILLS LTD.AND ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA Date : 28th July, 2014. For Appellant : Mr.S.B. Saraf with Mr.K.K. Maiti, Advocates For Respondent : Mr.N.K. Chowdhury with Mr.Arijit Chakraborti, Advocates The Court : Mr.N.K.Chowdhury, learned advocate appearing for the respondent/assessee, submitted that his client has not been in a position to give any reply to the show cause notice because copies of the seized documents were not made available to him. The adjudication was made without any reply from the assessee. The Tribunal is now in seisin of an appeal preferred by the assessee from the order passed by the adjudicatory authority. In the facts of the case, whether the assessee got a proper opportunity to reply to the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »