Kolkata Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Balaji Industries and anr. Vs. the Official Liquidator and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
ORDER SHEET CA No.213 of 2014 With CP No.348 of 2003 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction IN THE MATTER OF: HOOGLY INK COMPANY (DELHI) P.LTD.(IN LIQN.) AND BALAJ.INDUSTRIES & ANR. versus THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 4th April, 2014. Mr.Nilay Sengupta for Hooghly Dock & Port Engineering LTD.Mr.A.K.Agarwal for contributory. Mr.B.Mohanty, O.L.appeaRs.The Court : By order dated 18th July, 2012 an opportunity was given to the allottees to make payment of sums to remain in occupation of plots in the Loni Industrial Estate, DIC, Gaziabad. Certain sums have been paid and on 20th February, 2014 an extension was sought to make payment of the balance sum. Although an objection was raised the said was overruled and extension was granted to the allottees to make payment of Rs.9,96,547/-. Out of the said sum on 11th March, 2014 a sum of Rs.2,32,325/- has only been deposited with the Official Liquidator. This is not the amount contemplated t...
Nripendra Nath Mondal Vs. the Commercial Executive Engineer, Cesc Calc ...
Court: West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
This order relates to the prayer of the Appellant for condonation of delay in filing the appeal on 03.12.2013 against the Order dated 03.09.2013 of the Ld. Forum below in the Execution Case No. 410 of 2013. There was a delay of 58 days beyond the statutory period of 30 days in filing the Appeal. The Appellant, who, by profession, is an Advocate, appeared in person and submitted during hearing on 14.03.14 that an Execution application being filed before the Ld. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata, Unit II on 19.08.2013 ,an order was passed on 03.09.2013 disposing of the Execution matter . Ld. Forum below in their order overlooked the fact that major part of their order dated 08.08.2013 in the original complaint case, CDRF No. 278 of 2003, was not complied with by the OPs. Hence an appeal has been filed against the order dt 03.09.2013 of the Ld. Forum below . The delay in filing the appeal was mainly because of the fact that though the order was passed on 03.09.2013, copy of the o...
Sashi Devi Agarwala Vs. R.C. Estate Private Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side Before: The Honble Justice Debangsu Basak C.S.No.347 of 1999 Sashi Devi Agarwala versus R.C.Estate Private LTD.& ORS.For the Plaintiff : Mr.P.K.Dutta, Advocate Mr.Chanchal Dutta, Advocate Mr.Rajashi Dutta, Advocate Ms.Krishna Mullick, Advocate Heard on : March 27, 2014 Judgment on : April 03, 2014 DEBANGSU BASAK, J. The plaintiff sought a decree for specific performance of an agreement dated August 20, 1995. According to the plaintiff, the agreement dated August 20, 1995 was for sale of entire ground floor measuring approximately 1717.95 sq. ft. and two garage spaces in the building constructed at premises No.P-39, C.I.T.Scheme, Manicktala Main Road, Kolkata. The agreement for sale between the plaintiff and the defendants was verbal. The defendant No.2 was the owner of the suit premises. The Defendant No.1 was the developer. The Defendant Nos.3 and 4 were the directors of the Defendant No.1 and partners of...
Disha Media Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cosmic Broadcasting Network Inc. and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
TA No.46 of 2014 T No.98 of 2014 GA No.1020 of 2014 CS No.118 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE DISHA MEDIA PVT.LTD.Versus COSMIC BROADCASTING NETWORK INC. & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 3rd April, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Surajit Nath Mitrra, Sr.Advocate S.S.Bose, Advocate Saurav Gupta, Advocate Abhijit Sarkar, Advocate The Court: This interim application in aid of the suit concerns a television channel by the name Disha. I am told that it broadcasts, amongst other things religious programmes and devotional songs. It entered into a legal relationship with the defendants. The latter became a partner or collaborators of the plaintiff in the United States for broadcast of the programmes in that country. This is evidenced by a memorandum of understanding dated 1st December, 2010 between the parties. It contains profit sharing clauses. I was shown minutes of the meeting held at Kolkata on 22nd December, 2013,...
Srei Equipment Finance Pvt. Ltd. Vs. B. R . Singh and Co. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
AP No.216 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE PVT.LTD.Versus B. R . SINGH AND Co.AND ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 3rd April, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Swatarup Banerjee, Adv.Ms.Sneha Sharma, Adv.The Court : The respondents are not represented despite service. The Receiver reports that dud cheques were made over by the respondents to the Receiver to stall the implementation of the outstanding order requiring the Receiver to take possession of the assets covered by the agreement. The Receiver also reports that despite the Receivers written request to the Superintendent of Police, Jamshedpur, such official did not extend any assistance to the Receiver to take possession of the asset covered by the agreement notwithstanding the order of Court obliging the official to render requisite help. This is not the fiRs.instance of a Superintendent of Police in the State of Jharkhand not taking cognizance of an order ...
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
ORDER SHEET CP No.642 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction IN THE MATTER OF : BRG IRON & STEEL CO.PVT.LTD.AND PARMESHWAR LAL SARAF BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 3rd April, 2014. Mr.K.C. Garg, Ms.Sunita Agarwal for petitioning creditor. Mr.Siddhartha Chatterjee for the company. The Court : This winding up application has been filed for price of goods sold and delivered. The case of the petitioning creditor is that the goods were supplied not only to the company but also to one Bhuvee Profiles & Stainless PVT.LTD.which at present stands merged with the company. Therefore, for supplies made to it a claim has also been made. Bills were raised on the company for the supplies made and as the sum was not paid a statutory notice was issued on 18th July, 2013 which though received by the company, no reply has been given thereto. Therefore, this company petition be admitted and orders be passed as sought. Counsel for the company submits that from the ledger a...
Tota Transport Services (P) Ltd. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Present : The Honble Justice Soumitra Pal April 3, 2014 W.P.No.276 of 2014 Tota Transport Services (P) LTD.versus The State of West Bengal & ORS.Mr.S.N.Mukherjee, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Amal Sen, Advocate Mr.Bhaskar Nandi,Advocate for the respondents. The Court :- Affidavit of service filed in Court today be kept on record. Though by order dated 27th March, 2014, the Chief Electoral Officer was added as party respondent and a copy of the writ petition was served on 1st April, 2014 on the added respondent, as evident from the affidavit of service, however, none appears on behalf of the added respondent. In the writ petition the petitioner who has been given an offer letter dated September 27, 2013 for plying vehicles in between Karunamoyee, Salt Lake to Matigara and who has deposited a sum of Rs.64,000/- towards permit fees on February 28, 2014, has prayed for a direction upon the State Transport Author...
Deepak Khaitan and ors Vs. Ajay Jalan and ors
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
1 GA No.986 of 2014 APOT No.146 of 2014 CS No.89 of 2014 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE DEEPAK KHAITAN & ORS Versus AJAY JALAN & ORS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE Date : 3rd April, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Goutam Chakraborty and Mr.Tilak Bose,Sr.Advocates With Mr.Soumava Ghosh, ld. Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Jishnu Saha, Mr.Joyjeet Ganguli, Mr.J.Surana And Mr.A.Ghowdhury, ld. Advocates for the respondent. Mr.Siddhartha Mitra, ld. Sr.Advocate, Mr.Debabrata Das, Advocate for Board of Appeal. The Court :- This litigation has a special feature. The respondent approached the learned Judge for interim relief in a civil suit. The learned Judge at the end of the day declined to pass any order in his favour, yet made some observations, which the appellants before us would feel objectionable. The respondents do not file any cross-appeal or cross-objection. The facts would depict an unfortunate incide...
Saroj Kumar Das and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Present : The Honble Justice Soumitra Pal April 3, 2014 W.P.No.272 of 2014 Saroj Kumar Das & Anr. versus The State of West Bengal & ORS.Mr.Rameswar Bhattacharya, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Amal Sen, Advocate Mr.Bhaskar Nandi,Advocate for the respondents. The Court :- Affidavit of service filed in Court today be kept on record. Though by order dated 27th March, 2014, the Chief Electoral Officer was added as party respondent and a copy of the writ petition was served on 1st April, 2014 on the added respondent, as evident from the affidavit of service, however, none appears on behalf of the added respondent. In the writ petition, the petitioner, who has been given an offer letter dated February 19, 2014 for plying vehicles in between Mandarmoni to Bakkhali and who has deposited a sum of Rs.16,000/- towards permit fees on March 18, 2014, has prayed for a direction upon the State Transport Authority, Kolkata, a...
Smt. Bhatni Devi and anr. Vs. Coal India Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
ORDER SHEET WP No.576 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SMT. BHATNI DEVI & ANR. Versus COAL INDIA LTD.& ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 3rd April, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Subrata Ganguly, Adv.Mr.R.N. Mazumder, Adv.Mr.Partha Basu, Adv.Mr.Nikhil Kr. Roy, Adv.The Court : Mr.Ganguly, learned Advocate, appears petitioners and Mr.Majumder, learned Advocate, appears on behalf of the on behalf of the respondents. The writ petitioner since deceased and substituted by his widow and son had faced disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by framing of charge, inter alia, that he had arranged his employment by declaring himself as the son of Shanti Devi who was the wife of Sarju Bhuinya by posing himself as Ramratan Bhuinya on the allegation that the said Shanti Devi and Sarju Bhuinya were both employees of ECL and had no issue at all. The enquiry culminated in a report pursuant to which the Disciplinary Authority awarded th...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »