Kolkata Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tata Capital Financial Services Limited Vs. Ranjan Singha Ray
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
1 ORDER SHEET GA No.1072 of 2014 APOT No.156 of 2014 AP No.1090 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED Versus RANJAN SINGHA RAY BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE Date : 21st April, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Santosh Kumar Roy, learned Advocate for the appellant. The Court :- This appeal would relate to an order dated March 24, 2014 wherein the Receiver already made an inventory and submitted report. The learned Judge discharged him from further acting. Hence this appeal. The sole respondent is not represented. The affidavit of service would depict, his door was under lock and key and the postal authority served intimation after making attempt to deliver the notice. However, the respondent did not turn up. Hence, we proceed exparte. The monthly instalments have become due and payable to the extent of Rs.7,14,338. Mr.Santosh Kumar Roy, learned Counsel appearing for the appel...
Santimoy Kundu Chowdhury and ors. Vs. Samir Kumar Kundu Chowdhury and ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
CS No.978 of 1935 GA No.4134 of 2008 GA No.4136 of 2008 GA No.4137 of 2008 GA No.4138 of 2008 GA No.4139 of 2008 GA No.4140 of 2008 GA No.4159 of 2008 GA No.2105 of 2013 GA No.2106 of 2013 GA No.2107 of 2013 GA No.2109 of 2013 GA No.2110 of 2013 GA No.2111 of 2013 GA No.2112 of 2013 GA No.2113 of 2013 GA No.2114 of 2013 GA No.2115 of 2013 GA No.2116 of 2013 GA No.2117 of 2013 GA No.2118 of 2013 GA No.2119 of 2013 GA No.2275 of 2013 GA No.2276 of 2013 GA No.2289 of 2013 GA No.3118 of 2013 GA No.3119 of 2013 GA No.3120 of 2013 GA No.3121 of 2013 GA No.3126 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Santimoy Kundu Chowdhury & ORS.Versus Samir Kumar Kundu Chowdhury & Orss. Before: The Honble Justice I.P.MUKERJ.Date: 21st April 2014 Appearance: Mr.S.N. Mitra, Sr.Advocate Mr.R.Basu Choudhruy, Advocate The Court: A peremptory extension of time to file affidavits is granted as follows in each of the above applications: Affidavit-in-opposition be filed by 30th Ap...
Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Sri Rasamay @ Rasamay Mondal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
ORDER SHEET GA No.3438 of 2013 APO No.66 of 2014 WP No.74 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD.Versus Sr.RASAMAY @ RASAMAY MONDAL & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY AND The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASIM KUMAR MONDAL Date: 21st April, 2014 Mr.Alok Banerjee, Adv.with Mr.Rajarshi Dutta, Adv.Mr.Partha Basu, Adv.Mr.Nikhil Roy, Adv..for the appellant Mr.Amal Krishna Chatterjee, Adv..for the respondents It appears from the records that the respondent-writ petitioner passed the Supplementary Higher Secondary examination conducted by West Bengal Board of Secondary Education in the year 1973 and in the said certificate, the date of birth of the respondent-writ petitioner has been recorded as 14th January, 1957. However, the Deputy Secretary (Records-Verification) of the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education by the written communication dated 18th May, 2012 informed the Chief Manager (M)/Agent, Girimint Collier...
Commercial Properties and Merchandise Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Kolkata Mu ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
ORDER SHEET GA No.992 of 2014 APO No.442 of 2006 WP No.90 of 2005 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES & MERCHANDISE LTD.& ANR. Versus THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY AND The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASIM KUMAR MONDAL Date: 21st April, 2014 Mr.Debashis Mitra, Adv.with Mr.Sailesh Kumar Gupta, Adv..for the appellants/petitioners Mr.Gopal Chandra Das, Adv..for the KMC It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner no.1 that in view of the death of the appellant no.2 on 28th December, 2013, right to sue survives on the other Directors of the appellant no.1. It has also been submitted on behalf of the petitioner no.1 that Shiv Shanker Poddar, son of the deceased appellant no.2 had been inducted as a Director of the petitioner no.1 and the right to sue survived on the said Shiv Shanker Poddar as the Director of the petitioner no.1. Therefore, prayer has been made before this Cou...
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
COMPANY APPLICATION No.237 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction IN THE MATTER OF: GCB FINVEST PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 21st day of April, 2014. Appearance : Mr.Amitabh Shukla, Advocate The Court : A meeting of the holders of the Equity shares of GCB FINVEST PRIVATE LIMITED (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company) shall be convened and held at No.10, Kiran Shankar Roy Road, 2nd Floor, Room No.34, Kolkata 700 001 on 16th day of May, 2014 at 03.00 p.m.for the purpose of considering and if thought fit, approving, with or without modification the Scheme of Amalgamation proposed of MGB COMMERCIAL PRIVATE LIMITED, CHERRY BUSINESS COMPANY PVT.LIMITED and REVIVAL BUSINESS PRIVATE LIMITED, (hereinafter referred to as the Transferor Companies) with UCIC PRIVATE LIMITED. A meeting of the holders of the Equity shares of MGB COMMERCIAL PRIVATE LIMITED (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company No -1) shall be convened and he...
Biri Trading Co. Vs. Dipak Kumar JaIn and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
ORDER SHEET GA NO.2344 OF2013WITH CS NO.270 OF2013IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BIRI TRADING Co.Versus DIPAK KUMAR JAIN & ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 21st April, 2014. Mr.J.Chowdhury, Ms.N.Banerjee, Mr.D.Deyappear. The Court : None appears for the defendants. No accommodation is sought. An affidavit of service is on record. It appears from the submissions of Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, learned counsel for the plaintiff as well as from the report of the Special Officer dated 24th September, 2013 that there is seepage of water into the area covered by the fiRs.floor. The fiRs.floor is under occupation of Mr.Chowdhurys clients as well as other persons. Primarily what needs comprehensive repairing is the ceiling of the fiRs.floor. Other incidental works of repair like plastering, checking and repairing of pipelines, balconies, parapet etc.are also required to check the seepage of water. Now, to undertake this work of ceilin...
imi Glory Limited Vs. Owners and Parties Interested In
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
ORDER SHEET GA No.1167 of 2014 AS No.5 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Admiralty Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IMI GLORY LIMITED Versus OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL M.V.HAN BAEK1BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 17th April, 2014. Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Tilok Bose, Sr.Adv.Swatarup Banerjee, Adv.Dwip Raj Basu, Adv.Pusphal Chakraborty, Adv.for the plaintiff Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee, Ms.Urmila Chakraborty, Mr.Pawan Kr. Maheshwari, Mr.Udit Agarwal, Mr.Sanchalita Sarkar, Adversus for the respondent The Court : A photostat copy of the letter of willingness issued by Shinhan Bank dated 17th April, 2014 has been handed to Court. This therefore evidences the bonafide intent on the part of the defendant owner to furnish the said letter for release of the said vessel. It has been submitted on behalf of the counsel for the defendant owner that a letter of authority is also being sent which for reasons beyond control could not be dispatched by Electronic Mail or Facsimile message. Accor...
L and W Commerce Ltd Vs. Owners and Parties Interested In
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
ORDER SHEET GA No.1091 of 2014 AS No.3 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Admiralty Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE L & W COMMERCE LTD Versus OWNERS AND PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE VESSEL M.V.HAN BAEK1BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 17th April, 2014. Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Tilok Bose, Sr.Adv.Swatarup Banerjee, Adv.Dwip Raj Basu, Adv.Pusphal Chakraborty, Adv.for the plaintiff Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee, Ms.Urmila Chakraborty, Mr.Pawan Kr. Maheshwari, Mr.Udit Agarwal, Mr.Sanchalita Sarkar, Adversus for the respondent The Court : A photostat copy of the letter of willingness issued by Shinhan Bank dated 17th April, 2014 has been handed to Court. This therefore evidences the bonafide intent on the part of the defendant owner to furnish the said letter for release of the said vessel. It has been submitted on behalf of the counsel for the defendant owner that a letter of authority is also being sent which for reasons beyond control could not be dispatched by Electronic Mail or Facsimile message. Acco...
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
ORDER SHEET CP NO.67 OF2014CA NO.6 OF2014IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE MATTER OF : SAS DIGITAL TELEVISION NETWORK PVT.LTD.& ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 17th April, 2014. MRS.M.BHUTERIA, MR.S.K.BAJAORIA, MR.MANAKENDU CHATTERJEE, MS.MOUMITA SARKAR, ADVOCATES FOR PETITIONER MR.JOYDEEP BANERJEE, ADVOCATE FOR CENTRAL GOVERNMENT The Court : Certain objections have been raised by the Central Government. The fiRs.of such objection is with regard to the registered office of the transferor company which is at New Delhi. The scheme has already been sanctioned by the Delhi High Court by its order dated 26th March, 2014. Therefore, the fiRs.objection raised by the Central Government in the light of the order dated 26th March, 2014 is not germane and is rejected. The second objection is with regard to submission of balance sheets till 1st March, 2014. Provisional balance sheet till 28th February, 2014 has been forwarded to the Central G...
Bengal India Global Infrastructure Ltd. and ors. Vs. Corporation Bank ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
TA No.57 of 2014 T No.131 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BENGAL INDIA GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.& ORS.Versus CORPORATION BANK & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 17th April, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Pramit Kumar Roy, Advocate Ms.Suparna Mukherjee, Advocate Mr.Rahul Sengupta, Advocate Ms.Koeliya Banerjee, Advocate Ms.Usha Doshi, Advocate The Court: Ms.Doshi, learned Advocate appearing for the defendant bank, submits that till date the plaintiffs or any one of them have not been declared as wilful defaulteRs.The bank is in the process of adjudicating the show cause notice, proposing to declare them as wilful defaulteRs.dated 12th December 2013, being Annexure C at page 48 of the petition. I only observe and direct that the bank will dispose of this show cause notice by passing a reasoned order, after considering the written representation from the plaintiffs, taking into account the judicial decisions that may be broug...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »