Kolkata Court April 2014 Judgments
Shivani Properties Private Limited Vs. United Bank of India
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE APD No.304 of 2013 CS No.31 of 1998 SHIVANI PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED -VERSUSUNITED BANK OF INDIA For the Plaintiff: Mr Sabyasachi Chowdhury, Adv., Mr Avinash Kankani, Adv., Mr Syed E. Huda, Adv.For the Defendant: Mr Partha Sarathi Bose, Sr Adv., Mr Subrato Dutt, Adv.Hearing concluded on: April 29, 2014. BEFORE SANJIB BANERJEE, Judge Date: April 30, 2014. SANJIB BANERJEE, J. : The reference under Clause 36 of the Letters Patent has been made upon a difference of opinion in a Division Bench as to the actual rent in 1995 in respect of the suit premises. The material part of the Division Bench order reads as follows: Since on the ultimate result on fixation of rent, we could not be ad-idem, the matter may be placed before the Honble Chief Justice to refer it to a Third Judge to answer the following question: What would be the actual rent in 1995 in respect of the suit premises?. Is it Rs.14.50 as decided by the lea...
Tag this Judgment!Jyothy Laboratories Limited Vs. V V F (India) Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-30-2014
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE GA No.196 of 2014 APOT No.36 of 2014 AP No.1562 of 2013 JYOTHY LABORATORIES LIMITED Versus V V F (INDIA) LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA Date : 30th April, 2014. For Appellant : Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.S.K.Kapur, Senior Advocate Pratap Chatterjee, Senior Advocate Ranjan Bachawat, Advocate Anirban Ray, Advocate Sourav Ghosh, Advocate Prithwiraj Sinha, Advocate Kushal Polley, Advocate Arnab Basu Mullick, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Advocate Sarbapriay Mukherjee, Advocate Soumabha Ghose, Advocate Aniruddha Agarwalla, Advocate The Court : The subject matter of challenge in this appeal is an ad interim order dated 15th January, 2014 passed by brother Sanjib Banerjee, J., in an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Extensive submissions were made on behalf of the appellant as to why the ord...
Tag this Judgment!Sujit Arya and anr. Vs. Surya Mansions Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-30-2014
ORDER SHEET GA NO.225 OF2014WITH CS NO.310 OF2013IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SUJIT ARYA AND ANR. Versus SURYA MANSIONS PVT.LTD.& ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 30th April, 2014. Mr.A.Chowdhury, senior advocate, Ms.L.Banerjee, Mr.A.Poddarappear. Mr.A.MitraappeaRs.Mr.K.Mullick, Ms.D.Dutta, Mr.A.Chakrabortyappear. Mr.S.ChowdhuryappeaRs.Ms.D.GhoshappeaRs.The Court : This is an interim application in aid of a representative suit. Two shareholders of the company Surya Mansions PVT.Ltd., the defendant no.1, are the plaintiffs. According to them this company is now in the hands of wrong doeRs.They are in full control of the company. Their actions are causing loss to it. My attention was drawn to an agreement dated 22nd June, 2009 where the company was a party as a developer for development and sale of the property of the company on the 10th floor as mentioned in Part-I of the second Schedule at page 170 of the petition, f...
Tag this Judgment!Life Insurance Corporation of India and anr. Vs. Election Commission o ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-30-2014
ORDER SHEET WP No.372 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR. Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA Date: 30th April, 2014 Mr.Prabal Mukherjee, Adv.with Mr.Gorachand Roychoudhury, Adv..for the petitioners Mr.Dipayan Chowdhury,Adv.with Ms.Priyanka Chowdhury, Adv..for the Election Commission of India. This is a writ petition at the instance of the Life Insurance Corporation of India questioning the action of the Election Commission of India, the Chief Electoral Officer and the District Election Officers to requisition the services of nearly 45% of its employees in connection with the parliamentary elections due to be held on 7th May, 2014 and 12th May, 2014 in the State. I have been informed by Mr.Chowdhury that all the employees whose services are requisitioned would be imparted training on 4th May, 2014, i.e.a Sunday. 2 On the dates of elections, that...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Property Promoters Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Uro Infotech Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE Present : The Honble Justice Soumen Sen C.S.293 of 2013 Oriental Property Promoters PVT.LTD.versus Uro Infotech LTD.For the plaintiff : Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, Ms.Noel Banerjee, Mr.Dipak De Heard on : 29.04.2014 Judgment on : 30th April, 2014 Soumen Sen, J.:- The plaintiff instituted the suit for recovery of khas, peaceful and vacant possession of the premises situated at 84A, Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose Road, Kolkata 700 014 more fully described in the schedule being Annexure A to the plaint. The plaintiff has also claimed decree for mesne profits and other reliefs. The plaintiff after the institution of the suit made several attempts to serve the writ of summons upon the defendant. In fact, the plaintiff has followed all the three mode of services, namely, service by the process server, service by speed-post and substituted service. But in spite of all efforts being made, no direct service could be effec...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Shree Ganesh Forging Co and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE W.P.No.236 of 2014 M/s Shree Ganesh Forging Co & Anr. Versus Union of India & ORS.BEFORE The Honble Justice HARISH TANDON Mr.Sandip Agarwal, Mr.J.P.Khaitan, Mr.S.Dasgupta. .for the petitioners Mr.S B Saraf Mr.T.M. Siddiqui. for the respondents Judgment On : 30.04.2014 HARISH TANDON, J : In the second round of litigation before this Court, the writ petitioner has assailed the order dated 4th March, 2014 passed by the CustoMs.Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata by which an application for restoration of the appeal is dismissed on the ground of limitation provided under Section 35 (C) (2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The undisputed facts are that one Maram Lakshmi Narayana was carrying out the business as proprietor in the trade name and style of Shree Ganesh Forging Company and committed default in payment of excise duty. A proceeding was initiated against the proprietor who subsequently died ...
Tag this Judgment!Tapan Kumar Chakraborty Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-30-2014
ORDER SHEET GA No.952 of 2014 APOT No.143 of 2014 WP No.217 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY Versus KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASIM KUMAR MONDAL Date : 30th April, 2014. For Appellant : Mr.Partha Chakrborty, Mr.Jayanta Mukherjee and Mr.Sourav Karmakar, Advocates For KMC : Mr.Aloke Kumar Ghosh, Advocate Ms.Sima Chakraborty and Mr.Gopal Chandra Das, Advocates For Private Respondents: Mr.Kallol Bose, Mr.Bratin Dey, Advocates The Court : A report has been submitted by the Municipal Commissioner of Kolkata in compliance with the earlier direction passed by this Court. In the aforesaid report it has been specifically mentioned that Premises No.263, Aurobindo Park has been found on inspection where construction work is now going on but Premises No.254, Aurobindo Park could not be detected after searching. No.254, We do not Aurobindo specia...
Tag this Judgment!Npr Finance Ltd. Vs. Deepak Jhunjhunwala
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Honble Justice Mr.Ashim Kumar Banerjee And The Honble Justice Mr.Arijit Banerjee APD230of 2010 CS97of 2003 NPR Finance LTD.-vs.Deepak Jhunjhunwala And APD231of 2010 CS94of 2003 Rani Leasing & Finance LTD.-vs.Deepak Jhunjhunwala And APO8of 2011 CS61of 2004 And APO9of 2011 CS339of 2004 Stock Holding Corporation of India -vs.The Calcutta Stock Exchange Association LTD.For the appellants : Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Adv (in APD230of 2010 and APD231of 2010) Ms.Rajashree Kajaria, Adv.Mr.Soumabho Ghose, Adv.For the respondents : Mr.Surajit Nath Mitra, Sr.Adv.(in APD230of 2010 and APD231of 2010) Mr.Asish Chakraborty, Adv.Mr.Arindam Mukharjee, Adv.For the appellants : Mr.Shib Sadhan Das, Adv.(in APO8of 2011 and APO9of 2011) For the respondent No.1 : Mr.Sakhya Sen, Adv.(in APO8of 2011 and APO9of 2011) Mr.Rupak Ghose, Adv.For the respondent No.2 : Mr.Anuj Singh, Adv.(in APO8of 2011 and APO9of 2011) : Mr.Syed E. Hadu, Ad...
Tag this Judgment!Indian Steel Corproation Ltd. Vs. the Owners and Parties Interest in t ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-30-2014
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Admiralty Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE GA No.1156 of 2014 AS No.4 of 2014 INDIAN STEEL CORPROATION LTD.Versus THE OWNERS AND PARTIES INTEREST IN THE VESSEL M.V.HAN ZHANG AND GA No.1360 of 2014 AS No.4 of 2014 INDIAN STEEL CORPROATION LTD.Versus THE OWNERS AND PARTIES INTEREST IN THE VESSEL M.V.HAN ZHANG BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 30th April, 2014. Mr.Ratanka Banerjee, Adv., Mr.Krishna raj Thaker, Adv., Mr.Swarjit Dey, Adv.and Mr.Indradeep Basu, Adv..for the plaintiff/petitioner. Mr.Tilok Kumar Bose, Sr.Adv., Mr.Swatarup Banerjee, Adv., Mr.Subhojit Roy, Adv.with Mr.Rohit Mukherji, Adv..for the defendant/respondents. THE COURT :-This matter was mentioned by the owners of M.V.Han Zhang for filing of a letter of willingness on the basis of which the subject vessel could be released from arrest. Along with this matter GA No.1360 of 2014 appearing as New Motion was heard. By the said application the plaintiff seeks enhancement of secur...
Tag this Judgment!Dinesh Agarwal Vs. Knight Dealtrade Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-30-2014
A.P.No.646 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE DINESH AGARWAL Versus KNIGHT DEALTRADE PVT.LTD.& ORS.Appearance Mr.Kishore Dutta, Adv.Mr.S.N.Mitra, Sr.Adv.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 30th April, 2014. The Court : This petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is based on an arbitration agreement not contained in the matrix contract executed by the parties or by way of a separate agreement governing the matrix contract involving the petitioner. The petitioner seeks to invoke the arbitration agreement as contained in the original agreement for sale of the concerned immovable property as the petitioner claims to be the assignee thereunder and says that his agreement with the fiRs.respondent should be deemed to have incorporated the arbitration clause as part thereof. As the petitioner puts it, A entered into an agreement for sale with B which B subsequently assigned in favour of C and w...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »