Kolkata Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India Vs. M/S. Premier Engineering Syndicate and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-11-2014
ORDER CS No.282 of 2002 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction UNION OF INDIA Versus M/S.PREMIER ENGINEERING SYNDICATE & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date: 11th March 2014. Appearance: Mr.P.S. Bose, Senior Advocate ...for the plaintiff. Mr.Somraj Mukherjee, Advocate Mr.Swarajit Dey, Advocate Mr.Indradeep Basu, Advocate ...for the defendants. COURT: The dispute in the suit appears to be an excess amount received by the defendants from the plaintiff in terms of the award made and published on 2nd September 1996. was made rule of court on 8th July 1998. that the plaintiff had paid to the The said award The plaintiff alleged defendants a sum of Rs.1,85,14,117/- in excess of what the defendants would have received under the award. Considering the nature of the dispute and after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, in my view, the parties should be referred to mediation in order to enable them to arrive at a settlement. mediation. Accordingly...
Bidhu Bhusan Sarkar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-11-2014
ORDER SHEET WP No.1289 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BIDHU BHUSAN SARKAR Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 11th March, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Pradip Sengupta, Adv..for the petitioner. Mr.Soma Kar Ghosh, Adv..for the respondent no.2. Mr.Rabindranath Pal, Adv..for the Union of India. The Court: The plaintiff-workman has suffered an order before an authority who does not have the jurisdiction to decide the application filed by the petitioner for extending the benefit under a settlement. Although the petitioner has filed an application under Section 33C2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, but the said application was filed before the authority under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 and not before the Labour Court. The Authority under the Payment of Wages Act in the fiRs.paragraph of the effective portion of the order recorded that the authority has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the said application. How...
Qumex Moulds Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Gorav Intertrade Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-11-2014
ORDER SHEET CP No.100 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE QUMEX MOULDS PVT.LTD.Versus GORAV INTERTRADE PVT.LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 11th March, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Anirban Roy, Adv.Mr.Sourav Ghosh, Adv.Mr.P.Sinha, Adv.Mr.Arnab Basu Mallick, Adv.Ms.Manju Agarwal, Adv.Mr.Biswanath Chatterjee, Adv.The Court : In my order dated 21st January, 2014 the company was directed to make payment of Rs.9,79,994/- in instalments. This amount was directed to be paid in view of the admission made by the company. It will not be out of place to mention that the original petitioning creditor was one Gorav Intertrade Private Limited. The original claim of the petitioning creditor was admitted and in default, advertisement was directed to be published. Such advertisement was published and one Prasanna Kumar Nahata claiming to be a supporting creditor participated in the winding up proceedings. Although directions were given for filing affidavits ...
Allied Publishers Private Limited Vs. Timely Books Centre and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
ORDER SHEET CS No.38 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE ALLIED PUBLISHERS PRIVATE LIMITED Versus TIMELY BOOKS CENTRE & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 10th March, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Suvadeep Sen, Adv.Mr.Sarathi Dasgupta, Adv.Mr.D.N.Chunder, Adv.The Court : Pursuant to the order passed by this Court, Mr.Kamal Pal, Assistant Manager, Asset Recovery Management Branch and Mr.G.S.Misra, Assistant General Manager, Ganesh Chandra Avenue Branch, are present. The said officers of the bank have tendered unconditional apology. It is regrettable in spite of communication of the earlier orders the said bank had failed to supply the required documents. However, the statement of account of Timely Books Centre relating to the period from 11th July, 2005 to 28th August, 2005 is filed in Court. It is submitted on behalf of the bank that the statement of account in relation to the said Timely Books Centre for the earlier period is ...
Passport Brands Clothing Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kolkata Metropolitan Develo ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
AP No.708 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side PASSPORT BRANDS CLOTHING Co.PVT.LTD.Versus KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (KMDA) & ORS.Appearance Mr.Avijit Dey, Adv.Petitioner Mr.Sankarsan Sarkar, Adv.Respondent No.2 Mr.Debnath Ghosh, Adv.Mr.P.Mukherjee, Adv.Respondent No.3 BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : March 10, 2014. The Court : In view of the order passed on a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in CO No.2555 of 2011 on December 24, 2013, nothing survives of this request under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The arbitration clause relied upon is contained in a deed of lease. The third respondent lessor claims that two agreements were simultaneously executed between the third respondent and the petitioner: one in respect of the lease of the premises in question and the other in respect of the facilities to be provided thereat. According to the third respon...
Seri Equipment Finance Ltd. Vs. Sree Metalliks and anr
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
AP No.1347 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SERI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LTD.Versus SREE METALLIKS & ANR BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 10th March, 2014. Appearance: Mr.S.Banerjee, Adv.The Court : The respondents are not represented despite previous service. The receiver has filed a report from which it appears that out of the 32 assets, covered by the agreement, the receiver has been able to make an inventory of about 20 or so. The report indicates that the assets which have been inventorised are in poor condition. The petitioner claims that a sum in excess of Rs.1 crore is due only on account of defaulted instalments, without taking into account the interest and other charges payable under the agreement. Since the respondents show no interest in the matter, the receiver is directed to take possession of the assets that have been inventorised. The receiver should remove the assets to one or more places to be provide...
The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Delite Spinning Mills Pvt. Lt ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
ORDER SHEET CS No.124 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE THE COTTON CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.Versus DELITE SPINNING MILLS PVT.LTD.& ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 10th March, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Sanjay Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Shivaji Mitra, Adv.The Court: The plaintiff has instituted a suit for recovery of various amounts towards carrying charges, transportation charges and other amounts. The plaintiff states that the defendant has at an earlier stage wanted to amicably settle the dispute and in fact there are correspondence to that effect. The dispute is essentially arising out of transportation of materials. After hearing the parties and going through the record, it appears to me that the disputes involved can be amicably settled between the parties, if the parties are referred to mediation. It appears to this Court that their exists element of a settlement which can be arrived at during mediation. In view of the af...
M/S. Vikram Private Limited Vs. Tata Aig General Insurance Company Lim ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
ORDER SHEET CS No.61 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.VIKRAM PRIVATE LIMITED Versus TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 10th March, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Bimalendu Das, Adv.The Court: The plaintiff has instituted a suit for recovery of varius sums under Insurance Policy. The dispute is essentially arising out of repudiation of a claim by the defendant. After hearing the parties and going through the record, it appears to me that the disputes involved can be amicably settled between the parties, if the parties are referred to mediation. It appears to this Court that their exists element of a settlement which can be reached by and between the parties if the parties are referred to mediation. The parties have also on principle agreed that before the matter is taken up for hearing they would explore the matter being settled through mediation. In view of the aforesaid, the dispute...
Nand Kishore Singla Vs. the Official Liquidator
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
ORDER SHEET CA No.257 of 2013 CP No.116 of 1996 CA No.314 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction IN THE MATTER OF: REMINGTON RAND OF INDIA LTD (IN LIQN.) AND NAND KISHORE SINGLA versus THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 10th March, 2014. Mr.Aniruddha Roy, Mr.D.Sharma, Mr.M.Ojha for WorkeRs.Mr.V.N. Mishra, Mr.K.Mullick, Mr.C.K.Chowdhary for applicant in CA No.257/2013. Mr.Deepak Kr. Jain, Advocate appeaRs.MRS.Ruma Sikdar for Official Liquidator. The Court : By order dated 4th March, 2014 the Official Liquidator, Calcutta High Court was directed to take physical possession of the assets and properties of the company (in liquidation) at Faridabad. The representative of the Official Liquidator, Calcutta High Court along with the representative of the Official Liquidator, Delhi High Court visited the factory premises of the company (in liquidation) at Faridabad, Haryana and took possession of the said factory premises. At the time of tak...
Srei Equipment Finance Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sukhvinder and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
A.P.No.412 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE PVT.LTD.Versus SUKHVINDER & ANR. Appearance Mr.S.K.Tiwari, Adv.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : March 10, 2014. The Court : The respondents are not represented despite previous service. A recent notice has been issued by the petitioner to the respondents informing them of the offers received for the two machines that form the subjectmatter of the agreement between the parties and have been taken possession of by the receiver pursuant to orders of this Court. Since the respondents show no interest, the sale of the two assets is confirmed in favour of Satish Chanda of Gaziabad at Rs.21.50 lakh, subject to the entire consideration being paid by way of a pay order or bankers cheque, not being a personal cheque, made out in favour of the petitioner within a fortnight from date. In default of such payment, the earnest deposit of Rs.1 lakh will stand for...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »