Kolkata Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sujit Kumar Banerjee Vs. National Insurance Company Limited and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Present: The Honble Justice Debangsu Basak W.P No.304 of 2009 Sujit Kumar Banerjee versus National Insurance Company Limited & ORS.For the Petitioner : Mr.Sabyasachi Chowdhury, Advocate Mr.Saumyen Datta, Advocate MRS.Soma Kar Ghosh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr.Aniruddha Chatterjee, Advocate Mr.Rajesh Singh, Advocate Hearing concluded on Judgment on : October 28, 2014 : December 02, 2014 DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:- The writ petitioner seeks recovery of a sum of Rs.1,63,32,947/from the insurance company on account of commission. Mr.Sabyasachi Chowdhury learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that, the writ petitioner is an agent of the Respondent No.1. The writ petitioner as an agent of the Respondent No.1 was allotted a number being licence No.644409 issued by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority. The writ petitioner was assigned an agent code being 90000310 by the Respondent No.1. The writ peti...
M/S. Bhagawati Enterprises Vs. M/S. Prakash Engineering Works
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side Before: The Honble Justice Debangsu Basak C.S.No.250 of 1994 M/S.Bhagawati Enterprises versus M/S.Prakash Engineering Works For the Plaintiff : Mr.Aniruddha Mitra, Advocate Mr.G.S.Gupta, Advocate For the Defendant : Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Hearing concluded on : November 19, 2014 Judgment on : December 02, 2014 Shakya Sen, Advocate P. Saha, Advocate H.B.Dubey, Advocate Mukush Mishra, Advocate DEBANGSU BASAK, J. The plaintiff seeks money decree against the defendant. According to the plaintiff, it had entered into an agreement with the defendant to buy 450 metric tonnes of cast iron scraps at a rate of Rs.4,000/- per metric tonne. As consideration thereof the plaintiff paid an advance of Rs.18 lakhs by four several cheques between the period September 1, 1990 and September 13, 1990. All the aforesaid cheques were encashed and proceeds thereof appropriated by the defendant. According to the plaintiff, the defendant fail...
Govind Commercial Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Uco Bank
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
ORDER SHEET WP No.651 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE GOVIND COMMERCIAL Co.LTD.& ORS.Versus UCO BANK BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date : 2nd December, 2014. Mr.Srenik Singhvi, Ms.Sananda Ganguli, Adversus for the petitioners Mr.Uday Sankar Bhattacharya, Mr.Sailesh Mishra, Adversus for the bank The Court : The writ petitioners seek return of title deeds belonging to the petitioner No.1 from the respondent. The petitioner No.1 enjoyed credit facilities from the respondent. As security, original title deeds in respect of three shops lying and situate at City Centre, Block DC, Sector-1, Salt Lake was deposited with the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioners relies on the letter dated December 28, 2004 written by the respondent. Such letter, according to the learned counsel, lays down the terms and conditions for the sanction of the credit facilities. The rate of interest was agreed to be 7% per annum floating with ...
Jeevan Diesels and Electricals Vs. the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking C ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
APO254of 2014 CP845of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction In Appeal From Its Company Jurisdiction Original Side Present : The Honble Mr.Justice Ashim Kumar Banerjee And The Honble Mr.Justice Ashis Kumar Chakraborty Jeevan Diesels and Electricals versus The Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Appearance: Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee, Sr.Advocate Mr.Siddhartha Banerjee, Advocate Mr.P.B.Bhaumik, Advocate Mr.S.K.Samanta, Advocate ..For the Appellant MRS.Meena Venugopal, Advocate MRS.Sushmita Banerjee, Advocate Mr.Sanjib Dawn, Advocate .For HSBC Limited Heard On:- November 17, 2014. Judgment On: - December 2, 2014 Ashis Kumar Chakraborty, J. This is an appeal against an order passed by a learned Single Judge on June 19, 2014 admitting the winding up petition against the appellant company for a sum of Rs.7,00,29,142/- . By the said order the learned Single Judge, however, granted opportunity to the appellant company for liquidating their dues to the respondent...
Sachchidananda Banerjee Vs. Moly Gupta and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side Before: The Honble Justice Debangsu Basak C.S. No.643 of 1990 Sachchidananda Banerjee Vs. Moly Gupta & Ors. For the Plaintiff : Mr. Sabyasachi Chowdhury, Advocate Mr. Jayanta Sengupta, Advocate Mr. Nirmalaya Ray, Advocate For the Defendants : Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Hearing concluded on : November 24, 2014 Judgment on : December 02, 2014 Reetobrata Mitra, Advocate Rupok Ghosh, Advocate M.A Jabbar, Advocate N. Khanjoy, Advocate DEBANGSU BASAK, J.The suit is for specific performance of an agreement dated August 13, 1988. The original defendant No.1 was the owner of premises No.12F, Nather Bagan Street, Kolkata. The plaintiff claims his father to be a tenant in respect of a portion of the said premises. The plaintiff and the original defendant No.1 entered into the agreement dated August 13, 1988 whereby and whereunder the original defendant No.1 agreed to sale the said premises to the plaintiff at and for an agreed ...
Venus Engineering Concern Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
ORDER SHEET APO4542014 AP2742005 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE VENUS ENGINEERING CONCERN PVT.LTD.Versus UNION OF INDIA BEFORE : The Honble JUSTICE BANERJEE The Honble JUSTICE ASHIS KUMAR CHAKRABORTY Date : 2nd December, 2014 Mr.Jayanta Mitra, Senior Advocate Mr.Dipak Kumar Basu, Senior Advocate Mr.Paramesh Bhattachary, Advocate Mr.R.Dutta, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.L.K.Chatterjee, Advocate Mrs.Aparna Banerjee, Advocate for the respondent. The Court : Yesterday, we heard Mr.Paramesh Bhattacharya. We kept it today for further hearing as Mr.Mitra was not available. Today, we heard Mr.Mitra, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant as well as Mr.Chatterjee for the Union of India. Despite rapt attention, we could not understand the stand of the Union of India either before the learned Single Judge or before us. The parties had a discord that was referred to arbitration under the old arbitration law being Arbitration Act, 1940. A form...
Sss Loha Marketing Private Limited Vs. Bibby Financial Service India P ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction In Appeal From Its Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Present : The Honble Mr.Justice Ashim Kumar Banerjee And The Honble Mr.Justice Ashis Kumar Chakraborty APO452of 2014 CP552of 2013 SSS Loha Marketing Private Limited versus Bibby Financial Service India Private Limited And APO302of 2014 CP552of 2013 Bibby Financial Service India Private Limited versus SSS Loha Marketing Private Limited Appearance: Mr.M.S.Vinayak, Advocate Ms.Ahana Sikder Advocate, ..For Bibby Financial Service Mr.Samit Talukder, Senior Advocate Mr.Suman Dutt, Advocate Mr.Hasnuhana Chakraborty, Advocate .For S.S.S.Loha Mktg. LTD.Heard On:- November 19, 2014. Judgement On: - December 2, 2014. Ashis Kumar Chakraborty, J. The subject matter of challenge in these appeals is an order dated May 13, 2014 passed by a learned Single Judge admitting an application for winding up of the company one namely, SSS Loha Marketing Private Limited for Rs.3,00,06,655...
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
CP No.659 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION IN THE MATTER OF: JAI BALAJ.INDUSTRIES AND SOUTHERN ROAD CARRIERS LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER Date : 2nd December, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Ratnanko Banerji, Sr.Adv.Mr.S.Mitra, Adv..for the petitioning creditor Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Sr.Adv.Ms.Rajshree Kajaria, Adv.Mr.S.Ghose, Adv.Ms.Sonia Sharma, Adv..for the company The Court : Having heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, it appears that the matter now returns to this Court pursuant to the observations contained in the judgment and order dated 16th July, 2014, passed by an Honble Division Bench of this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioning creditor submits that the company has failed to deposit the balance sum as reflected in the penultimate part of the said judgment and order with the Registrar, Original Side, by 15th September, 2014. In default of such deposit, the Honble Appeal Court had observed that the balance s...
of India and United Bank of India Vs. the official Liquidator
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE CA7972012 CA11262011 CA1152012 BIFR5101992 CA4262012 Mining & Allied Machinery Corpn. Ltd ( In Liquidation).State Bank of India & United Bank of India -vsThe Official Liquidator BEFORE The Honble Justice HARISH TANDON Appearance: Mr.R.N. Majumdar,Adv., Mr.S.Chakraborty, Adv., Mr.Amiya Sur, Adv., Mr.Susanta Pal, Adv., For the Workers Mr.J.N. Manna, Adv., For 45 Contract Labourers Mr.Goutam Kr. Roy, Adv., Mr.Aniruddha Roy, Adv., Mr.Shamit Sanyal, Adv., .for State Bank of India Mr.Lal Mohan Hazra, Adv.Mr.Somesh Panja, Adv..for Claimants No.27 Judgment On : 02.12.2014 HARISH TANDON, J : These bunch of applications pertain to the direction to pay the legitimate dues to the secured creditors from the sale proceeds lying with the official liquidator in terms of the adjudication of claims on the basis of proof submitted with the official liquidator. Apart from the letter of direction sought by the official liquidator, the secure...
of India and United Bank of India Vs. The official Liquidator
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE CA7972012 CA11262011 CA1152012 BIFR5101992 CA4262012 Mining & Allied Machinery Corpn. Ltd ( In Liquidation).State Bank of India & United Bank of India -vsThe Official Liquidator BEFORE The Honble Justice HARISH TANDON Appearance: Mr.R.N. Majumdar,Adv., Mr.S.Chakraborty, Adv., Mr.Amiya Sur, Adv., Mr.Susanta Pal, Adv., For the Workers Mr.J.N. Manna, Adv., For 45 Contract Labourers Mr.Goutam Kr. Roy, Adv., Mr.Aniruddha Roy, Adv., Mr.Shamit Sanyal, Adv., .for State Bank of India Mr.Lal Mohan Hazra, Adv.Mr.Somesh Panja, Adv..for Claimants No.27 Judgment On : 02.12.2014 HARISH TANDON, J : These bunch of applications pertain to the direction to pay the legitimate dues to the secured creditors from the sale proceeds lying with the official liquidator in terms of the adjudication of claims on the basis of proof submitted with the official liquidator. Apart from the letter of direction sought by the official liquidator, the secure...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›