Kolkata Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bengal India Global Infrastructure Ltd. and ors. Vs. Andhra Bank and o ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
GA No.2293 of 2014 CS No.114 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BENGAL INDIA GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.& ORS.Versus ANDHRA BANK & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date : 3rd November, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Pramit Kumar Roy, Sr.Advocate Mr.Meghjit Mukherjee, Advocate Ms.Suparna Mukherjee, Advocate Mr.Rajashekhar Mantha, Sr.Advocate Ms.Monalisa Das, Advocate Mr.M.Rajeswara Rao, Advocate The Court: The order of this court dated 28th July, 2014 in the above application was mentioned by Mr.Pramit Kumar Roy, learned Senior Advocate. That order, inter alia, provided for a brief opportunity of hearing to the plaintiffs. He showed me a letter dated 29th October, 2014 of Andhra Bank which, inter alia, stated that the plaintiffs request to be represented by an Advocate at the committee meeting of the Grievance Redressal Committee to be held on 6th November, 2014 at 1.00 P.M.was refused. I find that the above application is disposed of...
The Hon’ble High Court at Calcutta and ors. Vs. Anup Kumar Mukherjee ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Original Side Present : The Honble Justice Banerjee And The Honble Justice Ashis Kumar Chakraborty 03.11.2014 APO151of 2014 WP1514of 2006 The Honble High Court at Calcutta & ORS.versus Anup Kumar Mukherjee & Anr. Mr.Kishore Dutta, Advocate with Ms.Sumita Shaw, Advocate for the appellants Mr.Soumya Majumdar, Advocate with Mr.Ashis Mukherjee, Advocate for the respondents The Court :- The respondent was a member of the West Bengal Higher Judicial Service. He was a selection grade Officer. He claims to be eligible for selection of super time scale of pay. Such prayer was not allowed by the High Court Administration. Being aggrieved, he filed the writ petition and the learned single Judge allowed the writ petition. His Lordship passed an order allowing the writ petition by directing extension of all benefits that he was otherwise entitled to had he been promoted to the post of super time scale of pay. This appeal was heard on the la...
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Vs. Moti Lal Prasad
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
ORDER GA No.2447 of 2014 CS No.281 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD.Versus MOTI LAL PRASAD BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date: 3rd November 2014. Appearance: Mr.Siddhartha Mitra, Senior Advocate Ms.Mousmi Bhattacharya, Advocate Mr.A.Deb, Advocate ...for the petitioner. Mr.Dipankar Saha, Advocate ...for the respondent. COURT: Pursuant to the order dated 1st August 2014, the Special Officer visited the godown-cum-factory of the respondent and inventorized the goods. It appears from the report that one Kunal Kumar, who introduced himself as the son of the respondent, submitted that he is carrying on the business under the name and style of Kunal Detergent Works from the same place and he produced a trade licence in support thereof. Mr.Kumar further submitted running business. that Mr.Motilal Prasad is not the said In the godown of Kunal Detergent Works, the Special Officer found the infringed wrappeRs.Mr.Kumar state...
MartIn and Harris Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Organon (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE C.P.448 OF2012Martin & Harris PVT.LTD.vs Organon (India) PVT.LTD.BEFORE The Honble Justice HARISH TANDON Appearance: Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Pratap Kumar Chatterjee, Sr.Adv.Debnath Ghosh, Advocate, Sanjoy Ginodia, Advocate, Manoj Kuamr Tiwari, Advocate, ..for petitioning creditor. Mr.H.L.Tiku, Sr.Advocate, Ms.Yashmeet Kaur, Advocate, Ms.D.Adhikary, Advocate. Mr.S.Mitra, Advocate .for Martin & Harris PVT.LTD.Judgment On : 03.11.2014 HARISH TANDON, J : This winding up petition is at the instance of the petitioningcreditor for non-payment of the legally recoverable dues by the Company. The winding up petition is based upon the dues relatable to the value of the goods held by the Company, money receivable from various customers and the amount collected by the Company from the sales of the product of the petitioning-creditor. An agreement was entered into in the letter form on February 18, 1998 between the petitioning-cred...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›