Kolkata Court October 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bishnu Dasgupta Vs. M/S. Hindusthan Paper Corporation Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
APOT No.579 of 2013 GA No.3749 of 2013 WP No.831 of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BISHNU DASGUPTA Versus M/S.HINDUSTHAN PAPER CORPORATION LTD.& ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.MANJULA CHELLUR The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE Date : 30th October, 2014. For Appellant : Mr.Soumya Majumder, Advocate For Respondents: The Court : Aggrieved by the order of the Learned Single Judge in remanding back the matter for fresh consideration by the Industrial Tribunal concerned, the appellant-employee is before us contending that the order of the Tribunal deserves to be confirmed and there was no justification for the Learned Single Judge to remand the matter for fresh consideration. It is not in dispute that the appellant herein, being an employee of the writ petitioner Paper Corporation, was initially appointed as a peon and at the relevant point of time he was Assistant in the office of the Director (Finance).An incident that occurred on ...
C. I. T. Central Iii Vs. Chandela Trading Co. (P) Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
ORDER SHEET ITA831of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE C.I.T. CENTRAL - III Versus CHANDELA TRADING Co.(P) LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 30th October, 2014. For Appellant/Petitioner : Mr.S.N.Dutta,Advocate For Respondent/Assessee : Mr.J.P.Khaitan,Sr.Advocate Mr.C.S.Das,Advocate Mr.S.Das,Advocate The Court : The Court : This appeal has been filed under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order dated 13TH November, 2013 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, A Bench, Kolkata in ITA No.235/Kol/2012 relating to assessment year 2005-06 on the following questions: 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Learned ITAT erred on fact as well in law in deleting the addition of Rs.96,34,237/- made as undisclosed income on account of loans pertaining to five alleged creditors and interest thereon, without appreciating that the addition was sus...
Vck Share and Stock Broking Services Limited Vs. Bank of Rajasthan Lim ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE APO253OF2014WITH CS266of 2004 VCK SHARE & STOCK BROKING SERVICES LIMITED Versus BANK OF RAJASTHAN LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.MANJULA CHELLUR The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE Date : 30th October, 2014. Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, Advocate Mr.A.Ali, Advocate Mr.B.Jha, Advocate for appellant Mr.Tilak Bose, Sr.Advocate Mr.S.Deb, Advocate Mr.Utsav Mukherjee, Advocate Mr.B.Biswas, Advocate for respondents The Court :-Heard learned Counsel in appeal and also crossobjection in the appeal. Both appeal and the cross objection are in respect of order dated 11.06.2014 in GA2265of 2010 and in C.S.266 of 2004. It is not in dispute CS266of 2004 came to be filed as early as 2004 and only in the year 2010 learned Counsel on behalf of the plaintiff sought for extension of time to lodge the Writ of Summons with the Sheriff. Ultimately the Court passed the impugned order on the said question and also considered the rel...
Jupiter International Ltd. and anr. Vs. the National Insurance Co. Ltd ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
ORDER SHEET WP354of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE JUPITER INTERNATIONAL LTD.& ANR. Versus THE NATIONAL INSURANCE Co.LTD.& ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date : 30th October, 2014. Mr.Anirban Ray, Adv.Mr.Jayanta Sengupta, Adv.Mr.R.Singh, Adv.Mr.Samim Ahamad, Adv.The Court:-The writ petitioner seeks relief with regard to an insurance policy. The writ petitioner had filed WP No.357 of 2012 in respect of another insurance policy relating to the same incident. Such writ petition was disposed of by a judgement and order dated March 11, 2014. An appeal from such judgement and order was preferred by the writ petitioner. By a judgement and order dated September 24, 2014, the Appeal Court admitted the appeal. The parties were directed to maintain the status quo as to the date of the order of the Appeal Court. By the judgement and order dated March 11, 2014, the Court directed the authorities to keep the letter of appointment in ...
Samir Kumar Poddar and ors. Vs. Jitubhai Patel
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
ORDER SHEET GA No.3235 of 2014 With CS No.208 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SAMIR KUMAR PODDAR & ORS.Versus JITUBHAI PATEL BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 30th October, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Ranjan Bachawat, Adv.Mr.Sayantan Basu,Adv.Mr.Tanway Roy, Adv.Mr.P.Sinha, Adv.Mr.Rupak Ghosh, Adv.appeaRs.The Court:- The application for amendment of the plaint was allowed by an order dated 21st August, 2014. However, the Department while carrying out the amendment found that there were certain incurable defects and the matter was placed before the court. In view of the aforesaid, the order allowing the amendment was recalled. Now, the plaintiff has filed a fresh application seeking the self-same amendment for the reason indicated earlier in the order dated 21st August, 2014. This application is allowed. The plaintiff shall serve a copy of the amended plaint upon the Advocate-on-record of the defendant within two weeks from da...
Senbo Engineering Limited Vs. Vinod Kumar Beotra and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
APOT No.591 of 2014 GA No.3275 of 2014 CS No.289 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SENBO ENGINEERING LIMITED Versus VINOD KUMAR BEOTRA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.MANJULA CHELLUR The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE Date : 30th October, 2014. For Appellants : Mr.Jishnu Saha, Sr.Advocate Mr.Sakya Sen, Advocate For Respondent No.1: Mr.Supratim Laha, Advocate Mr.Tanmoy Roy, Advocate The Court : This is an appeal against an order dated 25.08.2014 whereby the learned Single judge revoked the leave granted under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, 1865 and returned the plaint for being presented before the appropriate Court having jurisdiction. The suit was filed for recovery of certain amounts for works done and for declaration that some of the bills were illegal, null and void. But it would appear from the plaint that the plaintiff had entered into an agreement with the defendant No.1 for design and construction of underground stat...
indosolar Limited Vs. the Official Liquidator, High Court, Calcutta
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
ORDER SHEET C.A.No.603 of 2014 With C.P.No.271 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE PLG POWER LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) And INDOSOLAR LIMITED Versus THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, HIGH COURT, CALCUTTA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER Date: 30th October, 2014. Appearance: Ms.Sutapa Sanyal, Adv.Mr.Debrup Bhattacharjee, Adv.Mr.P.K.Tulsyan, Adv. for the petitioner Mr.R.C.Prusti, Adv.Mr.Debraj Banik, Adv.Mr.Sanjib Das, Adv. for the petitioning creditor Mr.Ranjit Chowdhury, Adv. for the official liquidator The Court: This is an application taken out by a company seeking a direction from this Court upon the Official Liquidator to file and upload E704 vat returns on the website of Maharashtra Commercial Tax Nasik for the year 20112012 along with vat audit report. Amongst other prayeRs.the applicant has also prayed for a direction upon the Official Liquidator to take steps for obtaining sales tax declaration Form H from the competent authority in conn...
Harpal Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
ORDER SHEET WP No.663 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE HARPAL SINGH Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date : 30th October, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Debrup Bhattacharya, Adv.For the petitioner. Mr.Anirban Dutta, Adv.Ms.Aparna Banerjee, Adv.For the Respondents. The Court :- The writ petitioner challenges the letter dated 31st August, 2009 issued by the Chief Commercial Manager to Senior Divisional Commercial Manager of Eastern Railway, Howrah. According to the writ petitioner, withholding of release of Vehicle Parcel Unit (VPU) without the disposal of the appeal for reweighment is unjust. It is submitted that the Railway Board had issued Circular No.51 of 2006 dated December 11, 2006 allowing reweighment. Such circular was issued in accordance with Section 79 of the Indian Railways Act, 1989. The circular under challenge was issued by the Chief Commercial Manager and is contrary to the circular of the Ra...
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE C.P.No.468 of 2009 BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.And MALVIKA SYNTHETICS (P) LTD.And C.P.No.299 of 2010 BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.And JET AGE FINANCE PVT.LTD.And C.P.No.311 of 2010 KLASSIC APARTMENT PVT.LTD.And BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.And C.P.No.11 of 2011 M/S.BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.And M/S.VISHWA ENTERPRISE And C.P.No.12 of 2011 M/S.BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.And M/S.TIRUPATI ENTERPRISES And C.P.No.14 of 2011 M/S.BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.And SAVITA BHARTIA And C.P.No.158 of 2011 BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.And M/S.CROMPTON INDUSTRIAL & CHEMICAL COMPANY And C.P.No.252 of 2012 BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.And ANSUYA J. DOSHI And C.P.No.238 of 2013 BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.And JAI BOTHRA (HUF) And C.P.No.257 of 2013 BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.And ANITA BOTHRA And C.P.No.258 of 2013 BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.And ANUJ BOTHRA And C.P.No.331 of 2013 M/S.BENGAL WATER PROOF LTD.And SMT. PAYAL SINGHANIA And C.P.No.391 of 2013 BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.And HITESH BABARIA...
M/S. Techno Banque (India) Private Ltd. Vs. Santosh Sen and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-30-2014
APOT No.593 of 2014 GA No.3276 of 2014 GA No.3277 of 2014 CS No.90 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.TECHNO BANQUE (INDIA) PRIVATE LTD.Versus SANTOSH SEN & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.MANJULA CHELLUR The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE Date : 30th October, 2014. For Appellant : Mr.Projoy Chatterjee, Advocate For Respondents: Mr.Reetobroto Mitra, Advocate The Court: Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and after condonation considering of delay, the cause the delay shown in in the preferring application the appeal condoned. The application for condonation of delay is allowed. for is The prayer for filing of the written statement was rejected. Hence, this appeal at the instance of the defendant. The suit was filed in 2011 whereas the application for extension was made in 2013. The learned Judge was perhaps not satisfied with the conduct of the defendant that would be ex facie apparent from the judgment and ord...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »