Kolkata Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax,w.B.ii Vs. Willamson Major and Co. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
ITA No.211 of 2001 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,W.B.-II -VersusWILLAMSON MAJOR & Co.LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE TAPASH MOOKHERJEE Date : 28th January, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Md.Nizamuddin, Adv...for the appellant. Mr.Sourav Bagaria, Adv...for the respondent. The Court : The appeal was preferred by the Revenue assailing a judgment and order dated 20th April, 2001. The learned Tribunal a) held that the units of UTI are not shares and, therefore, the explanation under Section 73 of the Income Tax Act, is not applicable. The learned Tribunal followed the judgment in the case of CIT versus Appollo Tyres LTD.reported in 237 ITR706 b) directed the assessing officer to allow deduction claimed by the assessee under Section 80HHC before apportionment of the composite income as per Rule 8. Being aggrieved by both the directions of the learned Tribunal, the present appeal was pref...
Froze Balal and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
ORDER SHEET G.A.No.663 of 2013 W.P.No.1007 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE FROZE BALAL & ORS.Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 28th January, 2014. Appearance : Mr.Debashis Kundu, Adv.Mr.R.N.Barik, Adv for the petitioners Mr.S.B. Saraf, Adv. for the Union of India The Court : The subject matter in this writ petition relates to the letters dated 17.07.2012 & 08.08.2012 whereby and whereunder the petitions were directed to deposit the outstanding demand immediately. The instant application i.e.G.A.No.663 of 2013 is taken out in this writ petition for an interim order restraining the respondent No.4 from giving effect to the order of attachment of a bank account till the disposal of the writ petition. According to the petitioners the authorities by taking advantage of the pendency of an appeal before the Tribunal, have initiated recovery proceedings for realization of an amount from the account...
P. K. Investments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Special Officer(Building), K. M. C.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
WP No.669 of 2005 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction P.K.INVESTMENTS PVT.LTD.Versus SPECIAL OFFICER(BUILDING).K.M.C. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Date : 28th January, 2014. For the Petitioner : Mr.R.N. Dutta, Adv.Ms.Sutapa Roychowdhury, Adv.The Court : The writ petitioner claims to be a tenant in respect of a room having an asbestos roof in the back portion on the ground floor of premises No.12/2, Hungerford Street, Kolkata. The petitioners said tenancy was subsequently confirmed by one of the joint owners by an affidavit sworn on 04.11.1999 before a Notary. In that affidavit, on behalf of the owners it was stated that the asbestos shed covered space is of temporary, not permanent nature and the area covered by the said asbestos shed is not common space of the said premises. Further that the said space does not violate any provision of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act and the same had been let out since December, 1990 to the writ petitioner...
Sri Asimes Goswami Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
ORDER SHEET WP No.372 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE Sr.ASIMES GOSWAMI Versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA Date: 28th January, 2014 Mr.Amal Baran Chatterjee, Advocate Mr.Sunanda Mohan Ghosh, Advocate ..for the petitioner Mr.Sadhan Roy Chowdhury, Advocate Mr.Sabhyasachi Roy Chowdhury, Advocate ..for the respondents The petitioner was initially appointed as Additional Public Prosecutor, High Court at Calcutta w.e.f.12.03.2003 and thereafter appointed as the Public Prosecutor, High Court at Calcutta w.e.f.27.11.2006. He continued as such till 13.06.2011. He is aggrieved because the bills raised by him for professional services rendered have not been cleared. I have heard learned advocates for the parties. It is not in dispute that the petitioner had rendered professional service for nearly 8 years 3 months. In my considered view, the office of the Legal Remembrancer owes a duty to look into ...
M/S. Maritime Overseas Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and Another
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax].ORIGINAL SIDE ITA No.249 of 2003 M/S.MARITIME OVERSEAS Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE TAPASH MOOKHERJEE Date : 28th January, 2014. For Appellant : Mr.R.N. Biswas, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.Nizumuddin, Advocate The Court : The subject matter of challenge in this appeal by the assessee is a judgment and order dated 10th June, 2003 by which the learned Tribunal disallowed deduction under Section 80HHB of the Income Tax Act on the ground that the assessee could not file any evidence or document to show that there was any kind of project/contract with any foreign company except that he was engaged in supplying labourer on a particular project. Mr.Biswas, learned advocate appearing for the appellant/assessee, drew our attention to the finding recorded by the CIT which to be precise reads as follows: I have gone through the assessme...
K .N.D. Engineering Technologies Ltd and anr. Vs. Customs, Excise and ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
WP No.6 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE K .N.D.ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES LTD & ANR. Versus CUSTOMs.EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, EASTERN ZONAL BENCH, KOLKATA & ORS.Appearance Mr.J.P.Khaitan, Sr.Adv.Mr.C.M.Ghorawat, Adv.Mr.Agnibesh Sengupta, Adv.Petitioners Mr.Shiv Shankar Banerjee, Adv.Mr.K.K.Maity, Adv.Respondents BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 28th January, 2014. The Court : The order dated 12th November, 2013, passed by the CustoMs.Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, is the subjectmatter of challenge in this writ petition. A show cause notice was issued upon the petitioners upon invocation of the extended period provided under explanation to Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. The proceeding initiated on the basis of the said show cause notice culminated into an order passed by the assessing authority which is further assailed before the Tribunal. From the said show cause notice it...
Mcleod Russel (India) Ltd, KolkatA. Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
ORDER SHEET W.P.No.48 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE MCLEOD RUSSEL (INDIA) LTD.KOLKATA. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 28th January, 2014. Appearance : Mr.B.Poddar, Mr.S.Gadodia, Mr.Somak Basu, Mr.Shiv Sankar Banerjee, Adv.Adv.Adv.Adv.The Court : The petitioner has sought for a declaration that the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 to the extent that it seeks to levy service tax on the services provided by the Government and / or local authorities is violative of Article 246 of the Constitution of India. This Court, therefore, feels that once the vires of the statutory provisions is challenged in this writ petition, the service is required to be effected upon the Attorney General of India. Accordingly, this Court directs the petitioner to serve the copy of the writ petition upon Attorney General of India indicating that this matter shall appear on 17.02.2014. The attention of the Cour...
Skj Coke Industries Limited and anr. Vs. Coal India Limited and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side Present : The Honble Justice Dr. Sambuddha Chakrabarti January 28, 2014 GA174of 2014 WP470of 2013 SKJ Coke Industries Limited & Anr. versus Coal India Limited & ORS.Mr.Saptangshu Basu, Senior Advocate with Mr.Pallav Banerjee, Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Rajarshi Dutta, Advocate with Mr.Partha Basu, Advocate Mr.Nikhil Kumar Roy, Advocate for the respondents The Court :- This application being GA174of 2014 in connection with the writ petition being WP470of 2013 as appearing in the list. At the hearing of this application with the consent of the parties the main writ petition has been taken up for hearing treating the same as on days list. Let affidavit in opposition filed by the respondents to the main writ petition be kept with the record. The petitioners are manufacturers of Low Ash Metallurgical Coal since 1986. In the year 2009 the writ petitioners entered into coal supply agreement with the Coal India L...
The National Insurance Co. Ltd. and Others Vs. Panu Rabi Das and Anoth ...
Court: West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
J. Bag, Member: The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5.11.2012 passed by the Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, North 24 Parganas, in C.C.Case No. 327/2011, whereby Ld. Forum below allowed the complaint against OP Nos. 1 - 3 with cost, compensation and penalty and dismissed the same against the Proforma OP No. 4 without any cost. The Complaint case, in brief, was as follows: The petitioner is the wife of late Gaya Rabi Das, who had obtained a Group Janata Personal Accident Insurance Policy (No. 100300/47/2K/9601062/2K/96/00260 dated 01.02.2001) from the OP insurance company. The insured, Gaya Rabi Das, was run over by the train No. DN 25/8 Express near eastern cabin of the railway gate at Pakur in Jharkhand on 8.3.2009. The Complainant being the nominee and beneficiary of the insured submitted insurance claim to OP No. 1 along with all relevant documents including copies of the Death Certificate, Post Mortem Report, Hospital documents, but no...
Piyal Pallab Sanyal Vs. Bharati Airtel Limited
Court: West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
J. Bag, Ld. Member: The present appeal is directed against the Order dated 20.06.12 of the Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, North 24-Parganas, in CC No. 247/2011 whereby the complaint was dismissed on contest on the question of maintainability. The complaint case, in brief, was as follows: The Complainant,an Internet Broadband Connection user since 1999, got one unlimited connection of the OPs RPS system and was connected by modem device supplied by a franchisee of the OP service provider in October 2007 . Immediately after such connection (Mobile Airtel No. 9903163414) the hackers were found to have been breaking the codes and using the connection to make the user computer a terminal server in the absence of any security provided by OP. The data card was found to be defective. The modem purchased at Rs 5000/- was not functioning . The Complainant, not being able to use the connection for fear of exposure, loss of business , besides suffering anxiety and agony. The ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »