Kolkata Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhagwati Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. TuhIn Kanti Ghosh and ors
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
ORDER SHEET CC No.118 of 2013 GA No.135 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Civil Jurisdiction ( Contempt ) ORIGINAL SIDE BHAGWATI DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.Versus TUHIN KANTI GHOSH & ORS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY Date : 16th January, 2014. Appearance : Mr.S.K. Kapoor, Senior Advocate. Mr.P.K. Jhunjhunwala, Advocate. for the petitioner Mr.Purnendu Das, Advocate. Ms.Pratiti Das, Advocate. for the respdt. No.1 Mr.A.Chatterjee, Advocate. Mr.T.Nag Chowdhury, Advocate. Mr.A.Basu, Advocate. for respdt. Nos.2 to 10. The Court : Mr.Kapoor, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the contempt application, being CC No.118 of 2013, had been preferred alleging violation of an order dated 12th September, 2005 passed in GA No.2896 of 2005 arising out of CS No.227 of 2004 and that in the said contempt application, inadvertently, an erroneous copy of the petition in GA No.2896 of 2005 was annexed and that the alleged acts of violation had been in...
Srei Equipment Finance Private Limited Vs. Suraj Chetia and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
AP No.1006 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED Versus SURAJ CHETIA & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 16th January, 2014. Appearance: Mr.S.Banerjee, Adv.The Court : The respondents are not represented despite previous service. The petitioner claims that a sum in excess of Rs.42 lakh is due only on account of defaulted instalments, if the termination of the agreement is disregarded. The respondents are in possession of the assets covered by the agreement. A previous order of August 7, 2013 recorded that since the respondents had paid a sum of Rs.40 lakh to the petitioner pursuant to the order dated June 12, 2013, the petitioner had not taken any steps to request the receiver to take possession of the assets covered by the agreement. The respondents were represented on August 7, 2013 and claimed that no further sum was due on account of defaulted instalments, though the peti...
Government of West Bengal Vs. Consulting Engineering Services (India)
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
1 ORDER SHEET GA No.3633 of 2013 APOT No.565 of 2013 CS No.403 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL Versus CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE Date : 16th January, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Paritosh Sinha for the appellant. Mr.Surajit Nath Mitra .for the respondent. We passed an order on December 16, 2013, inter alia, allowing the appeal of the State and set aside the interim order passed by the learned single Judge and gave directions for filing of affidavits before the learned single Judge. We make it clear, affidavit-in-opposition must be filed positively December 19, 2013. by Thursday next, meaning thereby Today, the mater is mentioned from which it appears that the affidavit-in-opposition was affirmed on December 19, 2013 and a copy of the said affidavit-in- opposition was sent to the respondent that was received on December ...
Vs. the Managing Committee of St. Masry'sr
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
ORDER SHEET WP No.1194 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY Petitioner Versus THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF ST. MASRY'S SCHOOL & ORS.Respondents BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBASISH KAR GUPTA Date : 16th January, 2014. For Petitioner : Mr.Saktipada Jana, Advocate For Respondents : Mr.Subhabrata Datta, Advocate Ms.Ssujata aaaaaGhosh, Advocate The Court : This writ application is filed by the petitioner for a direction upon the respondent authority to release his terminal benefits arising out of his service as an Assistant Teacher of Sr.Balkrishsna Vithalnath Vidyalaya. Having heard the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties as also after considering the facts and circumstances of this case I find that the terminal benefits of the petitioner could not be released pending decision of the State Government regarding pension cases relating to such employees of D.A.getting Secondary Institution who had retired on o...
Magma Fincorp Limited Vs. Durga Construction Co and anr
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
1 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE GA No.23 of 2014 APOT No.8 of 2014 AP No.1333 of 2013 MAGMA FINCORP LIMITED Versus DURGA CONSTRUCTION CO & ANR -AndGA No.28 of 2014 APOT No.11 of 2014 AP No.1335 of 2013 MAGMA FINCORP LIMITED -VSDURGA CONSTRUCTION CO & ANR -AndGA29of 2014 APOT No.12 of 2014 AP No.1334 of 2013 MAGMA FINCORP LIMITED -VSM/S.RCM INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ANR -AndGA No.35 of 2014 APOT No.13 of 2014 AP No.1336 of 2013 DURGA FINCORP LIMITED -VSDURGA CONSTRUCTION CO & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE Date : 16th January, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Paritosh Sinha, ld. Advocate for the Appellant. The Court :- Despite service, none appears to oppose this application. These appeals would involve a common question as to whether the injunction appellant restraining would the be entitled respondent to from an order receiving of any money from its debtORS.Mr.Sinha appearing for the appellant would c...
Srei Equipment Finance Limited Vs. Gopali Heavy Lifters and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE AP No.1540 of 2013 SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED Versus GOPALI HEAVY LIFTERS & ORS.And AP No.1541 of 2013 SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED Versus DHANLAXMI CRANES & ORS.AND AP No.1542 of 2013 SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED Versus GOPALI HEAVY LIFTERS & ORS.AND AP No.1543 of 2013 SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED Versus GOPALJ.INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS & ORS.AND AP No.1548 of 2013 SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED Versus GOPALJ.INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS & ORS.AND AP No.1551 of 2013 SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED Versus DHANLAXMI CRANES & ORS.AND AP No.1621 of 2013 SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED Versus GOPALI HEAVY LIFTERS & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 16th January, 2014. Appearance: Mr.S.Banerjee, Adv.Mr.Joy Saha, Adv.The Court : By consent of the appearing parties, AP No.1548 of 2013 and AP No.1621 of 2013 are treated as on the days list and this order will govern the five matters appeari...
Basistha Muni Ojhapetitioner Vs. Sstate of West Bengal and ors.Respond ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
ORDER SHEET WP No.1146 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BASISTHA MUNI OJHA Petitioner Versus SSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.Respondents BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBASISH KAR GUPTA Date : 16th January, 2014. For Petitioner : Mr.Saakstipada Jana, Advocate For Respondents No.2 and 3 : Mr.Sandip Kumar Bhattacharya, Advocate The Court : This writ application is filed by the petitioner for a direction upon the respondent authority to release his terminal benefits arising out of his service as an Assistant Teacher of Sr.Balkrishsna Vithalnath Vidyalaya. Having heard the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties as also after considering the facts and circumstances of this case I find that the terminal benefits of the petitioner could not be released pending decision of the State Government regarding pension cases relating to such employees of D.A.getting Secondary Institution who had retired on or after January 1, 2006 enjoying th...
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction CP468OF2009BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.AND MALVIKA SYNTHETICS (P) LTD.CP299OF2010BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.AND JET AGE FINANCE PVT.LTD.CP311of 2010 BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.AND KLASSIC APARTMENT PVT.LTD.CP11OF2011M/S.BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.AND M/S.VISHWA ENTERPRISE CP12of 2011 M/S.BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.AND M/S.TIRUPATI ENTERPRISES CP14OF2011M/S.BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.AND SAVITA BHARTIA CP158OF2011BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.AND M/S.CROMPTON INDUSTRIAL & CHEMICAL Co.CP566OF2011BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.AND INDRAJIT BALL CP252OF2012BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.AND ANSUYA J. DOSHI CP238OF2013BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.AND JAI BOTHRA (HUF) CP257OF2013BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.AND ANITA BOTHRA CP258OF2013BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.AND ANUJ BOTHRA CP331OF2013M/S.BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.AND SMT. PAYAL SINGHANIA CA353OF2013WITH CP566OF2011BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.AND INDRAJIT BALL AND MAHESH TEA CHEST CP391OF2013BENGAL WATERPROOF LTD.AND HITESH BABARIA AND FAMILY, HUF CP404OF2013B...
State of Jharkhand and ors. Vs. Bank of Baroda and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Before: The Honble Mr.Justice Debangsu Basak G.A.No.2140 of 2008 C.S.No.50 of 1996 STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.versus BANK OF BARODA & ANR. For the Plaintiff No.1 Plaintiff No.2 : Mr.Bindod Kr. Gupta, Advocate : Mr.S.C.Srivastava, Advocate For the Defendant No.1 : Mr.Pradip Kr. Dutta, Sr.Advocate : Mr.Dipak Kr. Pal, Advocate Defendant No.2 : Mr.Dhruba Ghosh, Advocate : Mr.Retabroto Mitra, Advocate : Mr.S.Mitra, Advocate Heard on : January 10, 2014 Judgment on : January 16, 2014 DEBANGSU BASAK, J. Defendant No.2 entered into two several contracts with the then State of Bihar to execute civil works at Palamu. At the request of the Defendant No.2 the Defendant No.1 furnished 18 several Bank guarantees in favour of the State of Bihar. Disputes and differences arose between the Defendant No.2 and the State of Bihar with regard to the execution of the aforesaid two contracts. The validity of the 18 several Bank guarantees were t...
(Now Known as “dalmia Bharat Developer”) Vs. the K.M.C. and ors
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
ORDER SHEET W.P.No.938 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.B.P.PROPERTIES LTD (now known as Dalmia Bharat Developer) Versus THE K.M.C.& ORS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL Date : 16th January, 2014. For Petitioner : Mr.Barin Banerjee,Advocate Mrs.V.Bhatia,Advocate Mr.G.P.Shaw,Advocate For KMC : Mr.P.K.Datta,Advocate Ms.P.Sengupta,Advocate The Court : Affidavit of service filed in Court today be kept on record. In the writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the notice under section 411(1) of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 dated 28th April, 2008 being Annexure-P/2 to the writ petition on the ground that it is vague as it contains no reference to the dangerous portion of the building. Submission has been made that though the petitioners did not file objection as sought for within seven days or soon thereafter, however, as representation was made on 14th February, 2012, the authorities may be directed to consid...