Kolkata Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chandrika Prasad Shaw and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-03-2013
ORDER SHEET WP No.862 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE CHANDRIKA PRASAD SHAW & ANR. Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA Date:3. d September, 2013 Mr.Aurbindo Chatterjee, Adv.with Sk. Samim Akhtar, Adv..for the petitioners Mr.Amitesh Banerjee, Adv.with Mr.Biswajib Ghosh, Adv..for the respondents The Director of Consumer Goods in his order dated 8th July, 2013 has granted the petitioners time till 31st August, 2013 to find out a suitable place for shifting of the kerosene oil shop without hampering the interest of the tagged consumers of such shop. Mr.Chatterjee, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that they have not been able to locate a suitable place for shifting of the kerosene oil shop and prays for an order on the respondents to grant time till 30th November, 2013 to shift such shop upon identification of a suitable place. Mr.Banerjee, learned advocate for the respondents...
Shilali Vs. Bharati Das and ors
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-03-2013
1 ORDER SHEET G.A.No.2510 of 2013 APOT No.402 of 2013 PLA No.88 of 1976 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE GOODS OF: SUBODH GOPAL BOSE {Decd} -AndIN THE MATTER OF : SHILALI versus BHARATI DAS & ORS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE MRINAL KANTI CHAUDHURI Date :3. d September, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Pradip Dutta with Mr.Sandip Ghosh Ld, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.R.L. Mitra, ld. Advocate for Legatee. Mr.Rabi Prosad Mukherjee and Ms.Shreya Ghosh Joint ReceiveRs.The Court :- The learned Judge increased the rent and the maintenance charges suo motu. The tenant has not come up in appeal contending, they were not party to the litigation. The learned Judge exceeded his jurisdiction in increasing the rent. Mr.Pradip Dutta, learned Senior Counsel appearing in support of the appeal, would contend, under the agreement the renewal would be done by increase of rent to be mutually agreed between the parties. Suo motu increase by t...
The Area Manager, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Malda and ...
Court: West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-03-2013
Debasis Bhattacharya, Member: This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 29.06.2011 in Case No. 06/2010 passed by the Ld. District Forum, Dakshin Dinajpur. By the impugned judgment, the Ld. District Forum has allowed the complaint in part on contest giving directions to the OP 1 and 3 to pay to the Complainant within 45 days from the service of the copy of the order upon them a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) by way of benefit under PA Insurance Policy bearing no. OG-05-2401-9960-00000041 in view of the Complainants sustaining disability from accidental injuries and interest over the said amount of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) @ 10% per annum from 01.04.2010 till actual payment. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order, the Insurance Company has preferred this appeal. It is the case of the Complainant/Respondent 1 in his petition of complaint that he opened one policy of the OP Insurance Company through OP GTFS being No. OG-05-2401-99...
Santimoy Kundu Chowdhury and ors. Vs. Samir Kumar Kundu Chowdhury and ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
ORDER SHEET GA No.2388 of 2013 CS No.978 of 1935 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction SANTIMOY KUNDU CHOWDHURY AND ORS.Versus SAMIR KUMAR KUNDU CHOWDHURY & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date :2. d September, 2013. Ms.Suparna Mukherjee for the applicant. Mr.Utpal Bose, Mr.Debdatta Sen, Mr.S.Chatterjee for Co-shareRs.Mr.Kausik Chanda for Union of India. The Court : By this application the petitioners seek to be examined pro inter esse suo. The case of the petitioners is that they are the owners of area mentioned in paragraph 1 of the petition. Such land has been sold by the Joint Receivers appointed in C.S.No.978 of 1935 without his knowledge. Therefore to protect his right in the said land this application has been filed for discharge of Joint Receivers and for other reliefs and also to set aside the order dated 20th April, 2009 whereby sale was directed. Counsel for majority shareholders submits that it is not aware of the property sold by the J...
Nawdeep Singh Vs. the Official Liquidator, High Court, CalcuttA. and a ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
ORDER SHEET SHEET NO.1 CA No.401 of 2013 With CP No.90 of 1983 CA No.342 of 2012 CA No.431 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction IN THE MATTER OF:ANGELO BROS LTD.(IN LIQUIDATION).AND IN THE MATTER OF:NAWDEEP SINGH Versus THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, HIGH COURT, CALCUTTA. & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE Date:2. d September, 2013 Appearance:Mr.N.S.Hoon appears in person. Mr.S.Chakraborty, Advocate for the Workmen. Mr.S.C.Prasad, Advocate..for the Official Liquidator. The Court:-This Judges summons has been taken out by one Nadweep Singh claiming to represent the workmen of the company (in liquidation).whose locus to take out the Judges Summons is strongly contested by Mr.Hoon. Considering the fact, however, that this is in connection with a winding up proceeding, it would be duty of the Court to consider the relevant materials coming from any source for the purpose of adjudicating the issues pertaining to the Company (in liquidation).utilisation appoin...
Ajay Kumar Agarwal Vs. Green Concretex Global Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
ORDER SHEET GA NO.2439 OF 201.WITH CS NO.286 OF 201.IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE AJAY KUMAR AGARWAL Versus GREEN CONCRETEX GLOBAL LTD. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date :2. d September, 2013. Mr.Utpal Bose, Mr.J.Ganguly, Mr.B.Biswasfor petitioner. Mr.R.Banerjee, Mr.S.Banerjeefor respondent. The Court : By order dated 20th August, 2013 the creditors of the respondent were directed not to make payment of Rs.1,11,51,507/- to the respondent. The said order was continued by order dated 30th August, 2013. While the petitioner seeks for extension of the interim order, such prayer is opposed by counsel for the respondent on the ground that the suit filed is for a money claim, which sums has not been ascertained or determined. Eleven several cheques were given as security in 2012 and all the said cheques were deposited at one go. Payments have been made to the petitioner and without ascertaining the exact amount due and payable the ord...
Gupta Biscuits (P) Limited Vs. the Registrar of Companies, West Bengal
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Original Side Present : The Honble Justice Subhro Kamal Mukherjee And The Honble Justice Asim Kumar Mondal September 2, 2013 APO 23.of 2013 CP 11.of 2010 Gupta Biscuits (P) Limited versus The Registrar of Companies, West Bengal Mr.P.K.Drolia, Mr.A.K.Lal Gupta For the appellant Mr.Dipanjan Dutta For the R.O.C Mr.Sudip Deb For the WBFC Judgement : September 2, 2013 Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, J.: This is an appeal against judgment and order dated June 12, 2013 passed by the Honble Company Judge rejecting an application under Section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956. We are concerned with Gupta Bicuits (P) Limited. Gupta Biscuits (P) Limited borrowed huge sums of money from the West Bengal State Financial Corporation . Unfortunately, the Company committed default. Notice under Section 29 of the West Bengal State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 was issued on July 15, 1987. The West Bengal State Financial Corporation took over possession ...
Hindustan Steelworks Constructioni Ltd. Vs. Quippo Construction Equipm ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
1 ORDER SHEET APOT NO.398 OF 201.CS NO.40 OF 201.GA No.2529 OF 201.IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE HINDUSTAN STEELWORKS CONSTRUCTIONI LTD.Versus QUIPPO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LTD.BEFORE: The Honble JUSTICE ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE The Honble JUSTICE DR. MRINAL KANTI CHAUDHURI Date :2. d September, 2013. Mr.Ravi Kapur, Advocate Mr.Rishad Medora, Advocate for the appellant. Ms.Samanya Sengupta, Advocate Ms.Nasreen Kauser, Advocate Ms.Sreemoyee Purkayastha, Advocate for the respondent. The Court : The Court earlier settled issues appearing at page 129. The issues were as follows:1. Was there any agreement between the parties in respect of the lease of equipment?.2) Is the suit bad for defect of the parties?.3) Was the defendant acting in the capacity of an agent of HSCL-SIPL (JV) in its dealing with the plaintiff?.4) Was there any default in payment of agreed monthly rental/hire charges of the equipment provided by the plaintiff as referred to in the t...
Bharatiya Janata Party and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Honble Justice Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay And The Honble Justice Murari Prasad Shrivastava. W.P.No.358 of 2012 BHARATIYA JANATA PARTY & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.With W.P.No.8662 (W) of 2012 Ganesh Chandra Chakraborty versus State of West Bengal & ORS.With W.P.No.9163 (W) of 2012 Acharya Jogesh Shastri versus State of West Bengal & ORS.With W.P.No.11118 (W) of 2012 Abhijit Kumar Chowdhury versus State of West Bengal & ORS.For the Petitioner in W.P.358/2012: Mr.K Chanda, Mrs.D.Bharadwaj, Mr.Debajyoti Adhikari, Ms.Sumitra Das. For the State in W.P.358/2012: Mr.Jayanta Kumar Mitra, Mr.Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, MRS.Debjani Roy. For the Petitioner in W.P.8662 (W) of 2012: Mr.C.R. Panda, Mr.Bimal Kr. Moitra, Mr.S.K. Nath. For the State in W.P.8662 (W) of 2012: Mr.Jayanta Kumar Mitra, Mr.Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, Mr.Nilotpal Chatterjee For the Petitioner in W.P.9163 (W) of 2012: Mr.Asis Sanyal...
Kippy Commercial Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Kolkata Municipal Corporat ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
ORDER SHEET WP No.264 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE KIPPY COMMERCIAL PVT.LTD.& ORS.Versus THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :2. d September, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Jayanta Mitra, Sr.Advocate Mr.S.Basu, Advocate Mr.Ritzu Ghosal, Advocate for the petitioners Mr.Barin Banerjee, Advocate Mr.Fazlul Haque, Advocate Mr.Santanu Chatterjee, Advocate for K.M.C.The Court: The principal question under consideration in this writ is whether the Kolkata Municipal Corporation is entitled to claim the retention charges or fees as claimed by them by their statement dated 23rd September, 2011. Admittedly this is an administrative order. Mr.Barin Banerjee, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Kolkata Municipal Corporation, admits that there is no provision for imposition or collection of this retention fee in the Kolkata Municipal Act, 1980 or in the rules framed thereunder namely, The Kolkata Munic...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »