Kolkata Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sri Bablu Ghosh Vs. M/S. Medow Feed Specilities Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-11-2013
ORDER SHEET EC NO.288 OF 201.IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE Sr.BABLU GHOSH Versus M/S.MEDOW FEED SPECILITIES LTD. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date :11. h September, 2013. Mr.A.K. Pal, Mr.S.Sarkarfor decree holder. Mr.A.Roy, Mr.R.K. Rai, Mr.A.Basufor respondent. The Court : This execution application has been filed to execute the decree dated 7th October, 2011. The case of the decree holder is that under an agreement dated 10th July, 2007 the decree holder was to supply milk to the judgment debtor. For the milk supplied sums became due and payable, which on demand were not satisfied by the judgment debtor. Accordingly, arbitration proceedings were initiated and an award passed. It is this award, which is being sought to be executed by the decree holder. After the passing of the decree proceedings were initiated by the Indian Bank under the 2002 Act and the property has been sold to one Amrit Fresh PVT.LTD.Therefore, it is Amrit ...
Sri Abhijit Chandra Vs. Coal India Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-11-2013
ORDER SHEET WP No.525 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE Sr.ABHIJIT CHANDRA Versus COAL INDIA LTD.& ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :11. h September, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Subrata Ganguly, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.R.N.Majumdar, Advocate Mr.Susanta Pal, Advocate Mr.Partha Basu, Advocate Mr.Nikhil Kumar Roy, Advocate for the respondents The Court: The petitioners case is like this. The petitioners grand father, late Mahadeb Chandra, had substantial tracts of land in Mugma area in Dhanbad District. His land was acquired by the respondent authorities. At the time of acquisition of the land, certain guidelines were framed by Eastern Coalfields LTD.for granting opportunity to a linear. (should be lineal.) descendent of the land loser to get employment. It appears from the decision of 7th February, 2013 of the General Manager, Mugma area, that the application of the writ petitioner for employment was rejected on the ground...
Sanjay Danchand Ghodawat Vs. Additional Commissioner of
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-11-2013
ORDER SHEET W.P.No.830 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SANJAY DANCHAND GHODAWAT Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(PORT),KOL & ORS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 11th September, 2013. Appearance: Mr.J.P.Khaitan,Sr.Advocate Mr.Arijit Chakraborty,Advocate Mr.B.Dutta,Advocate for petitioner. Mr.R.Bharadwaj,Advocate Mrs.Santa Mitra,Advocate for respondents. The Court : An interesting point has evolved in this writ petition as to whether the adjournment could be restricted only when an opportunity of hearing is demanded by the assessee under section 122A of the Customs Act, 1962. According to the petitioner, after receiving the show cause notice an adjournment was sought on the plea that the petitioner intends to approach the Settlement Commission. The said letter was received by the adjudicating authority on 8.3.2013 whereas the next date was fixed on 12.3.2013. Admittedly, thereafter no date is fixed by the adju...
M/S. Lee and Muirhead (P) Ltd and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and or ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-11-2013
ORDER SHEET WP No.744 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.LEE & MUIRHEAD (P) LTD & ANR. Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 11th September, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Dilip Kundu, Adv.Mr.C.K.Dutta, Adv.for the petitioner. Mr.N.Rakshit, Adv.for respondent no.3 Mr.C.Ghosh, Adv..for State of West Bengal The Court : The petitioners have assailed the order no.24 dated May 30, 2013 passed by the learned Judge, 2nd Labour Court in case no.2 of 2011 whereby and whereunder an application for production of the documents mentioned therein is allowed. In a proceeding initiated under Section 10(1B) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the company took a specific defence that there is no existence of relationship of employer and employee between the parties. It is further averted that the private respondent was employed by one Surendra Kapoor who was appointed as a Regional Manager on contractual basis and...
Magma Fincorp Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-11-2013
ORDER SHEET WP718OF2013IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Jurisdiction MAGMA FINCORP LTD.& ANR. Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 11th September, 2013. Appearance : Mr.Sakya Sen, Adv.Ms.Debjani Ray, Adv.Mr.Jishnu Saha, Adv.Mr.Sorbapriya Mukherjee, Adv.Ms.Sananda Ganguly, Adv.The Court : The short point canvassed by the petitioner in this writ petition is that the authorities are bound to accept the one time tax for a period of five years at the time of fiRs.registration of the motor vehicles. The petitioner contends that Section 9BB of the West Bengal Additional Tax and one time tax on Motor Vehicle Act 1989 which came to be inserted by the amendment Act 2012 postulates the payment of one time tax at the same rate which was paid at the time of the fiRs.registration. According to the petitioner, the demand by an authority to pay the tax at the rate not in consonance with Part 1A of schedule 4 as specified therein is contrar...
Celica Develpers Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-11-2013
ORDER SHEET WP719OF2013IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Jurisdiction CELICA DEVELPERS PVT.LTD.AND ANR. Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 11th September, 2013. Appearance : Mr.Sakya Sen, Adv.Ms.Debjani Ray, Adv.Mr.Jishnu Saha, Adv.Mr.Sorbapriya Mukherjee, Adv.Ms.Sananda Ganguly, Adv.The Court : This short point canvassed by the petitioner in this writ petition is that the authorities are bound to accept the one time tax for a period of five years at the rate at page. It was page at the time of fiRs.registration of the motor vehicles. The petitioner contents that Section 9BB of the West Bengal Additional Tax and one time tax on Motor Vehicle Act 1989 which came to be inserted by the amendment act 2012 postulates the payment of one time tax at the same rate which was paid at the time of the fiRs.registration. According to the petitioner the demand by an authority to pay the tax at the rate not inconsonance with Part 1A of s...
Hooghly Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
ORDER SHEET GA No.2612 of 2013 CS No.304 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction HOOGHLY INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD.Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date :10. h September, 2013. Mr.R.N. Bajoria, Sr.Advocate,Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Mr.Sarvopriya Mukherjee, Mr.S.Bagaria, Mr.Amit Agarwalla for the petitioner. The Court : In a suit for a declaration that excise duty, penalty and interest levied on the jute bags supplied by the plaintiff to the defendant no.1 is payable by the defendant no.1 this application has been filed for interim reliefs. The case of the petitioner is that it is a manufacturer of jute bags which are supplied to various agencies on orders being placed by Ministry of Commerce through the Directorate of Supplies and Disposal. Orders have been placed on the petitioner from time to time for supply of such jute bags and the pricing under the jute control order is to be made by the Jute Commissioner. Initially the said...
L and T Finance Ltd. Vs. Chanani Transport and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE A.P.No.165 of 2013 L & T FINANCE LTD.-VersusCHANANI TRANSPORT & ORS.A.P.No.166 of 2013 L & T FINANCE LTD.-VersusCHANANI TRANSPORT & ORS.A.P.No.168 of 2013 L & T FINANCE LTD.-VersusCHANANI TRANSPORT & ORS.Appearance: Mr.P.Sinha, Adv.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : September 10, 2013. The Court : The respondents are not represented despite service but the three matters are taken up together since the parties are the same. The petitioner reports that awards have been passed in the three matters in March, 2013 and the awards may now have become executable. The receivers appointed in these matters are in possession of some of the assets for which offers had been invited but no bid has been received. Since the receivers are in possession of some of the assets, the receivers will continue for a period of six weeks from date whereupon the receivers will make over possession of the assets in thei...
Kumar Narendra and ors. Vs. Coal India Limited (Government of India En ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Honble Justice Sambuddha Chakrabarti W.P.No.386 of 2009 G.A.No.2548 of 2012 Kumar Narendra & ORS.Versus Coal India Limited (Government of India Enterprise) & ORS.For the petitioners : Mr.B.R. Bhattacharya, Sr.Advocate Mr.Soumya Majumdar, Advocate Mr.Arjun Roy, Advocate For the respondents : Mr.A.K. Banerjee, Advocate Mr.A.Sarkar, Advocate Mr.Pradyut Kr. Das, Advocate Heard on :25. 09.2012, 04.12.2012, 15.01.2013, 19.03.2013 and 9.04.2013 Judgement on :10. 09.2013 The Court : By the present writ petition the petitioners have inter alia prayed for a Writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to re-fix their seniority in E-5 Grade with effect from the respective dates on which they had passed the FiRs.Class Mines Manager Certificate of Competence (MMCC, for short) while working in E-4 Grade, a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the case of the petitio...
M/S India Media Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Express Publication (Madurai) L ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
GA No.511 of 2013 CS No.486 of 2002 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S INDIA MEDIA SERVICES PVT.LTD.Versus EXPRESS PUBLICATION (MADURAI) LTD.AND ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date :10. h September, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Ajay Krishna Chatterjee, Sr.Adv.Mr.Moloy Kr. Ghosh, Adv.Mr.K.R. Thakkar, Adv.The Court : This application for entering appearance and leave to file the written statement has been made by the third defendant more than a decade after the institution of the suit and more than six months after the suit appeared in the warning list to be taken up ex parte. The suit was instituted on November 7, 2002 and it is admitted in the petition that the writ of summons was served on the third defendant on July 31, 2003. The time to enter upon appearance by the third defendant expired immediately after August 16, 2003 and the time to file the written statement expired on or about September 20, 2003. It was not as if the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »