Kolkata Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Academy of Fine Arts and ors. Vs. Jahar Dasgupta and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
ORDER SHEET GA CS IN THE Ordinary No.3156 of 2012 No.385 of 2012 HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Civil Jurisdiction ACADEMY OF FINE ARTS & ORS.Versus JAHAR DASGUPTA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date :12. h August, 2013. Mr.Anirban Roy, Mr.Orijit Chatterjee for the plaintiff. Mr.Joydeep Kar, Mr.S.Ghosh for respondent nos.1,3,4,12, 13 & 14. Mr.Kamalesh Jha for respondent nos.2, 7, 8, 16, 17, 19 & 21. Mr.Siddhartha Banerjee,Advocate/one of the Joint Special Officers appeaRs.The Court : A report was filed by the Joint Special Officers and it has been submitted by Counsel representing the existing executive committee whose existence is disputed by the plaintiff and denied by the respondents that 25 ordinary members have been left out from the draft list submitted to Court. At page 39 of the report it has been specifically stated that non-payment of subscription has not been considered although members who have not paid their subscriptions are not entitled to cast their vote ac...
Re: Credence Trexim Private Limited Vs. the Registrar of Companies, We ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
ORDER SHEET CP No.537 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE RE: CREDENCE TREXIM PRIVATE LIMITED Versus THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, WEST BENGAL BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date :12. h August, 2013. Mr.Uttam Kr. Ganguli,Adv..for ROC The Court: The petition is for resurrecting a company which has been struck off the list of functioning companies under Section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the statutory records and documents not having been filed. The Registrar has filed a statement indicating therein that a total amount of Rs.8,000/- on account of filing fees, additional filing fees and penalty would be due from the company to the Central Government if the statutory records not filed earlier were to be filed now. The petitioner accepts such position and is agreeable to pay the amount. Subject to the petitioner paying a sum of Rs.8,000/- to the Registrar of Companies within a fortnight from date, the Registrar will restore the name of ...
Smt Kiran Arya and anr. Vs. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN CS No.324 of 1989 SMT KIRAN ARYA & ANR. Versus AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LTD. & ORS. For the Plaintiff : Mr. Moloy Ghosh, Mr. Anuj Singh, Ms. Shrayashee Saha, Mr. Partha Banerjee For the Defendants : Mr. Shyama Prosad Sarkar, Sr, Adv., Mr. Swarnendu Ghosh, Mr. Deep Nath Roy Chowdury, Ms. Tannistha Lahiri Heard on :24. 07.2013, 12.08.2013 Judgment on :12. h August, 2013 Soumen Sen, J.:- The plaintiffs are the owners of an office space on the first floor at premises No.24, Park Street, Kolkata, measuring 2625 sq.ft. together with the parking space in the courtyard (hereinafter referred to as the suit premises). The plaintiffs have instituted the suit against the defendants for recovery of possession of the suit premises and for mesne profits from May, 1986 till possession. The plaintiffs purchased the suit premises from its erstwhile owner, Calcutta Credit Corporat...
Tirupati Multipurpose Heemghar Pvt Ltd Vs. the Registrar of Companies ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
ORDER SHEET CP No.531 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE TIRUPATI MULTIPURPOSE HEEMGHAR PVT LTD Versus THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES WEST BENGAL BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date :12. h August, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Dharmendra Tiwari, Adv..for the petitioner Mr.Dipanjan Datta,Adv..for ROC The Court: The petition is for resurrecting a company which has been struck off the list of functioning companies under Section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the statutory records and documents not having been filed. The Registrar has filed a statement indicating therein that a total amount of Rs.30,000/- on account of filing fees, additional filing fees and penalty would be due from the company to the Central Government if the statutory records not filed earlier were to be filed now. agreeable to pay the amount. The petitioner accepts such position and is Subject to the petitioner paying a sum of Rs.30,000/- to the Registrar of Companies within a f...
Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
ORDER SHEET APOT No.47 of 2002 GA No.297 of 2002 WP No.1516 of 2001 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SUBRATA SARKAR Appellant Versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.Respondents BEFORE: The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE Mr.ARUN MISHRA The Hon'ble JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI Date :12. h August, 2013. For Appellant : None For Respondents: None The Court : Against the impugned judgment and order dated 22nd November, 2001, passed by the Single Bench in W.P.No.1516 of 2001, the appellant has questioned the legality of the order, Annexure P/12., whereby the passed claim of by the the District petitioner Inspector for of approval Schools, of his appointment against the permanent vacancy had been rejected. The petitioner applied for appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher in Physical Education for a short duration. He was called by the West Bengal Regional Service Commission to attend personality test and thereafter the West Bengal Regional Service Commission vid...
M/S. G.R.A. Holdings (P) Limited Vs. Qamrun Nisha Ahmed and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
ORDER SHEET CS No.365 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.G.R.A.HOLDINGS (P) LIMITED Versus QAMRUN NISHA AHMED & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date :12. h August, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Sarathi Dasgupta, Adv.Ms.Sreetama Manna, Adv.Mr.Sabhyasachi Sen, Adv.Mr.Amitesh Banerjee, Adv.Mr.Anuj Singh, Adv.The Court: During the trial of the suit the plaintiff and the defendant nos.1 and 3 have agreed to settle their disputes and have filed a Terms of Settlement. Mr.Anuj Singh, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the defendant no.2 submits that the defendant no.2 is not bound by the Terms of Settlement. It appears from the Terms of Settlement that the defendant nos.1 and 3 admitted that the sum of Rs.47 lacs is due and payable to the plaintiff and have proposed to pay the said amount in installments commencing from September 25, 2013 and ending on 25th April, 2017. It was further agreed that upon payment of last installment t...
Leonard Exports Vs. Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
ORDER SHEET GA NO.2191 OF 201.WITH CS NO.408 OF 201.IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE LEONARD EXPORTS Versus CENTRAL INLAND WATER TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date :12. h August, 2013. Mr.S.K.Roy Chowdhury, Mr.A.K.Jenafor petitioner. Mr.T.Bose, senior advocate, Mr.A.Mitrafor respondent. The Court : By this application the petitioner seeks unloading of fly ash upon compliance of all formalities by the plaintiff. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that the cargo was to be delivered in Assam but the same was not done and, therefore, the contract was frustrated. In view thereof, the instant suit has been field. It also informed the applicant herein to carry the goods to Mongla, Bangladesh but the same was not done. Today, the plaintiff has no claim over the said goods and cannot take responsibility thereof. Accordingly, let steps be taken by the applicant herein to sell the goods. Out of the sale proceeds the ...
Sars Surya Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. and the Registrar of Companies, ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
ORDER SHEET CP No.541 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SARS SURYA CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD.Versus AND THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, WEST BENGAL BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date :12. h August, 2013. The Court: The petition is for resurrecting a company which has been struck off the list of functioning companies under Section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the statutory records and documents not having been filed. The Registrar has filed a statement indicating therein that a total amount of Rs.30,000/- on account of filing fees, additional filing fees and penalty would be due from the company to the Central Government if the statutory records not filed earlier were to be filed now. The petitioner accepts such position and is agreeable to pay the amount. Subject to the petitioner paying a sum of Rs.30,000/- to the Registrar of Companies within a fortnight from date, the Registrar will restore the name of the company to the list of activ...
Sri Ahmed HussaIn Vs. Coal India Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
ORDER SHEET WP No.559 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE Sr.AHMED HUSSAIN Versus COAL INDIA LTD.& ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :12. h August, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Subrata Ganguly, Advocate Mr.A.Banerjee, Advocate Ms.S.Barman Roy, Advocate The Court: One, Bakrid Mia was a worker in Dhemomain colliery under Eastern Coalfields LTD.He had cancer and was declared medically unfit by the Area Medical Board on 12th March, 1991. His services were terminated on 9th April, 1991. Bakrid had nominated his son, Samsul Mia, for employment but he predeceased Bakrid. He died on 22nd January 1992. Bakrid died on 14th December, 1996. Bakrids widow is Sakina Bibi. She made her claim for employment but was not considered as she had crossed the age of forty-five years at the time of her husbands termination of service. Under the applicable terms of employment, a female dependant heir could only get appointment on compassionate grounds upto...
Biswanath Modi and ors. Vs. Manoj Kumar Modi and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
ORDER SHEET GA No.1300 of 2013 CS No.697 of 1982 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction BISWANATH MODI & ORS.Versus MAnot KUMAR MODI & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date :12. h August, 2013. Mr.Sakya Sen, Mr.J.Jhunjhunwala for the defendant no.1. Ms.Anjana Banerjee for the Receiver. The Court : The Receiver appointed by order dated 25th July, 2007 seeks discharge by filing this application. The reason for such discharge is that in view of proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 the tenants or occupants of the said premises from whom he was to collect rent or occupation charges are no longer paying him any suMs.The accounts till December, 2011 has also been filed and leave be given to file accounts till the date of discharge. Hence orders be passed as sought. Counsel for the defendant no.1 submits that the defendant no.2 has not entered appearance and out of the four plaintiffs three have already died. Notice to the plaintiff no....
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »