Kolkata Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-10-2013
CP No.206 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION IN THE MATTER OF : STONE INDIA LTD.-ANDVIJAYA INDUSTRIES BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date :10. h May, 2013. Appearance Mr.Rajarshi Dutta, Adv.Mr.Siddhartha Banerjee, Adv.The Court : Leave is given to the petitioner to use a supplementary affidavit. A copy of such supplementary affidavit has been served earlier on the company. The company has no defence to the claim on account of balance price of goods sold and delivered. The companys stand in the affidavit-inopposition is at gross variance with its reply to the statutory notice. The petitioner claimed in the statutory notice of July 12, 2012 that a balance sum of Rs.16,72,283.44 remained due and owing from the company to the petitioner in respect of the bills raised by the petitioner on the company between March and August, 2011 on account of goods supplied by the petitioner to the company. The statutory notice detailed the bills, the dates thereof an...
Punjab National Bank Vs. Sri Kamal Singh
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-10-2013
GA No.3565 of 2005 CS No.172 of 1986 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Punjab National Bank Versus Sr.Kamal Singh Before: The Honble Justice I.P.MUKERJ.Date:10. h May 2013 Appearance: Mr.Soumen Das, Advocate Mr.Sourjya Roy, Advocate for the decree-holder Mr.Ujjal Datta, Advocate Mr.Kishore Mukherjee, Advocate for judgment-debtor No.2 The Court: The fiRs.judgment-debtor has absconded. He could not be brought to Court to be examined regarding his assets. The warrant of arrest against him was discharged on 5th August 2011. The second judgment-debtor was extensively examined by Mr.Das. Inspite of very extensive cross-examination, Mr.Das has not been able to extract any admission or information from this judgment-debtor regarding his assets. I have reasons to believe, considering the contradictions in his evidence, that he is not a very truthful witness. On one occasion he said that he was living in his sons property and on another he stated that the propert...
Jcc India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cimmco Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-10-2013
ORDER SHEET CS No.18 of 2001 GA No.3225 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE JCC INDIA PVT.LTD.Versus CIMMCO LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date :10. h May, 2013 Appearance: Ms.Ahana Sikhdar, Adv.Mr.Sanjib Kumar Mal, Adv.Mr.Debnath Dey, Adv.The Court: This application has been filed for rejection of the plaint on the ground that the BIFR has sanctioned the scheme on 11th March, 2010 in relation to the defendant company by which all the dues of the unsecured creditors is to be settled at the rate of 10% of the outstanding principal balances as per defendants books of accounts and subject to reconciliation with respected party as on the cut off date. The settlement amount is required to be paid in two half-year instalments from the date of sanction of scheme of BIFR within a period of three years from sanctioning of the scheme. The period of three years have expired in March, 2013. The plaintiff apart from questioning the bi...
Kanhaiya Lal Goenka and ors. Vs. Official Liquidator, High Court, Calc ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CA No.273 of 2008 BIFR No.278 of 1988 IN THE MATTER OF: DEBIKAY ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES LTD.(IN LIQN.) AND KANHAIYA LAL GOENKA & ORS.Versus OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, HIGH COURT, CALCUTTA AND CA No.46 of 2013 BIFR No.278 of 1988 IN THE MATTER OF: DEBIKAY ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES LTD.(IN LIQN.) AND OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, HIGH COURT CALCUTTA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date :10. h May, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Tilak Bose, Sr.Adv.Mr.Ronojit Chowdhury, Adv.Mr.Susanta Dutta, Adv.for the Official Liquidator Ms.Manju Bhuteria, Adv.for the Bhagwati Commercial Company The Court : Pursuant to a previous direction, IDBI Bank, Brabourne Road Branch, has forwarded details of the money lying to the credit of Debikay TeleCo.Private Limited with such branch. All money lying to the credit of Debikay TeleCo.PVT.LTD.will immediately be made over by the manager of IDBI Bank, Brabourne Road Branch, to the Official Liquidator for the Official Liquidator t...
In the Case of Ajit Chandra Majumdar Vs. Akhil Chandra Majumdar
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-10-2013
ORDER SHEET PLA No.24 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE GOODS OF: SMT. SUDHA RANI DE (DECD.) BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :10. h May, 2013. Appearance: Ms.Debosree Dutta, Advocate The Court: An application was filed in this Court by two sons of the testatrix as Joint Executors for obtaining probate of the will of their mother dated 23rd February, 1992, and a codicil dated April, 2000. The codicil is in holographic form. The application was for grant in common form, on the basis of consent affidavits of all the heirs of the testatrix who would have inherited her estate in the event of her intestacy. But the department of this Court held up the grant, on the ground that the codicil had not been attested in the same manner as the will. In those circumstances, the propounders were asked to prove the codicil in solemn form. I find that the will has been duly executed and attested. There is no opposition whatsoev...
The Calcutta Gujarati Education Society and anr. Vs. Budge Budge Compa ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-10-2013
ORDER SHEET CS No.317 of 2003 With GA No.3318 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE THE CALCUTTA GUJARATI EDUCATION SOCIETY & ANR. Versus BUDGE BUDGE COMPANY LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date :10. h May, 2013 Appearance: Ms.Noelle Banerjee, Adv.Mr.Dipak Dey, Adv.Mr.Sabhyasachi Chowdhury, Adv.The Court: This is an application at the instance of the defendant tenant for allowing the petitioner to effect necessary repairing work of the roof of the office of the suit premises. The petitioner is having its office at the 9th Floor of the said premises. Initially the matter was considered by the Honble Justice Asim Kumar Ray when after hearing the submission of the learned Counsel for the parties his Lordship was pleased to pass the following direction. I am to repeat that the decision taken by the joint Special Officers to which the petitioner agreed to has not been carried out. But the fact remains that there is a specific ord...
Sm.Pramila Devi Shaw Vs. Bijay Kumar Rathi and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-10-2013
GA No.82 of 2013 CS 18.of 2000 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE SM.PRAMILA DEVI SHAW Versus BIJAY KUMAR RATHI & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date :10. h May, 2013. Mr.S.Talukdar,Sr.Advocate appeaRs.Ms.H.Chakraborty,Advocate appeaRs.Ms.Ahana Sikdar,Advocate appeaRs.The Court :- This is an application filed by the judgement-debtor 1 series for condonation of delay and recalling of the judgment and decree dated 11th June,2012. This matter was heard from time to time. By an order dated 20th March,2013, the petitioner was directed to pay a sum of Rs.1 lakh to the decree-holder without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties to the suit. In terms of the said decree, the plaintiff is entitled to restoration of possession. The defendants have taken out an application for execution of the said decree dated 11th June,2012 in which Receivers have been appointed. When this matter was taken up on earlier occasions, this Court observed that the defendant shoul...
Titan Engineering Co.Pvt.Ltd. Vs. M/S. Super Gases and Appliances Pvt. ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-10-2013
ORDER SHEET CS No.550 of 1998 GA No.2147 of 2012 GA No.1173 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE TITAN ENGINEERING CO.PVT.LTD.Versus M/S.SUPER GASES & APPLIANCES PVT.LTD.& ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date :10. h May, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, Adv.Mr.C.Gupta, Adv..for the plaintiff. Mr.Arnab Sardar, Adv..for the defendant no.1. Mr.Rudraman Bhattacharya, Adv.Mr.Kanakendu Chatterjee, Adv..for the defendant no.2. The Court: This application is taken out by the defendant no.2 for recalling of an order dated 20th March, 2012 passed by Honble Justice Maharaj Sinha since retired. The applicant contended that the defendant no.2 all along was being represented by the defendant no.1 company and by a resolution dated 30th December, 1994 the defendant no.1 company had authorized the defendant no.2 to initiate and/or defend the defendant no.1 in any proceedings. The suit was filed in the year 1998 for eviction of the def...
Superintendence Company of India (Pvt)ltd Vs. Western Building Corpora ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-06-2013
ORDER SHEET G.A.No.241 of 2013 With C.S.No.343 of 1979 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SUPERINTENDENCE COMPANY OF INDIA (PVT)LTD Versus WESTERN BUILDING CORPORATION & ORS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :6. h May, 2013. For Petitioner : Mr.Debnath Ghosh,Advocate The Court : In terms of the order dated 7th March, 2013 advertisements have been inserted in the newspapers and affidavits of service of compliance are on record. This is an application by Bala Bestos (India) Limited. The applicant was assigned the apartment/unit no.3F on the third floor of Everest Building at 46C, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Kolkata- 700001 vide Deed of Assignment dated 18th February, 1993 by one Moti Tharumal Shivdasani who had entered into an agreement for sale of the said Flat within the Vendor. As assignee, the applicant paid the whole consideration and who was put in possession. The vendor has disappeared. The applicant is still in possession of the ...
Union of India and ors. Vs. Pansari Vegetable and Oils Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-06-2013
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA An appeal from its Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE GA No.1080 of 2013 APOT No.174 of 2013 WP No.883 of 2012 UNION OF INDIA & ORS.Versus PANSARI VEGETABLE & OILS PVT.LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE TARUN KUMAR DAS Date :6. h May, 2013. For Appellant : Mr.R.Bharadwaj with Md.Talay Masood Siddiqui, Advocates For Respondent : Mr.R.K. Chowdhury, Advocate The Court: This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 26th November, 2012 passed by sister Indira Banerjee, J. The operative portion of the judgment is as follows: The writ application is disposed of by directing the respondent authorities to refund penalty and fine refundable to the petitioner forthwith and in any case within thirty days from the date of communication of the order. The value of the oil shall be assessed at the earliest and in any case within sixty days from the date of communication of this order after giving t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »