Kolkata Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. National Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs. M/S. Saree Point, Prop. Sabina N ...
Court: West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-07-2013
Debasis Bhattacharya, Member 1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 13.07.2011 in C.C. No. 15/11(New)/C.C. No. 04/09 (Old), the OP Nos. 1 and 2 thereof have preferred this appeal. 2. In a nutshell, the case of the Complainant/Respondent No.1 in its petition of complaint is that it is a proprietress firm having its Shop-cum-Godown on the 3rd Floor at Doctor Danga, Chaibasa Road, Holding No. 312, Purulia, which was covered under the Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy No.150503/11/06/3100000225 and 150503/11/06/3100000226 for the period from 27.09.2006 to 26.09.2007 of the OP Nos. 1 and 2, for the stocks of sarees in the Godown for Rs.8 lakhs and for the stocks of the said goods in the shop for Rs. 2 lakhs, totalling a sum of Rs.10 lakhs, which is engaged in dealing with wholesale business of sarees purchased from various hats of Kolkata, paid mostly in cash and sold to various vendors in Purulia, Tatanagar (Jamshedpur) and suburbs, paid mostly in cash ...
The Manager (Dy. Manager-tech), Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Lt ...
Court: West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-05-2013
Debasis Bhattacharya, Member 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 25.03.2010 in Case No. 28/2007 as passed by the Ld. District Forum, Birbhum. 2. The case of the Complainant/Respondent No.1 in its petition of complaint is that it on good faith purchased one insurance policy no. OG-06-2401-4001-00004462 for the period 30.09.2005 to 29.09.2006 midnight, of a sum assured of Rs.2,30,000.00, divided into two parts being for super structure building for Rs.1,30,000.00 and others for Rs.1,00,000.00 and another Policy No.OG-06-2401-9961-00818149 for the period from 28.09.2005 to 27.09.2006 of a sum assured of Rs.1,80,000.00, from the OP Nos. 2 and 3. On 19.07.2006, at about 09.00 am, the insured (shop) building, i.e., Gharana Mall Pvt. Ltd. was badly damaged and heavy water rushed in causing heavy loss and injury to the building floor, wall, furniture and stock, etc. The Complainant informed it in writing on 20.07.2006 to the OP No.2 on the advice of OP No.1 and pray...
Sweety Todi Vs. Madhu Devi Saraf and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
1 ORDER SHEET GA No.699 of 2013 APOT No.113 of 2013 PLA No.267 of 2005 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE GOODS OF SHRI SHANKAR LAL SARAF(DEC) -ANDSWEETY TODI -VSMADHU DEVI SARAF & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE MRINAL KANTI CHAUDHURI Date :1. t March, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Jayanta Mitra, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Parthasarathi Sengupta and Mr.Abhrajit Mitra ld. Advocates for the appellant. Mr.S.N. Mookherjee, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Jai Surana, Mr.Aasish Chowdhury and Mr.Shaunak Mitra, ld. Advocates for the respondent no.1 Mr.Ranjan Deb,Sr.Advocate, Mr.Sakya Sen and Mr.Pradip Sancheti, ld. Advocates for respondent Nos.2 and 7. Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee, MRS.Lopita Banerjee, Mr.P.Roychowdhury and Mr.Soumabho Ghosh, ld. Advocates for respondent no.3. Mr.S.N. Mitra ld. Advocate for respondent no.5 The Court :- There will be an order in terms of prayer (a) of the petition. The testator died leaving his widow and four da...
Estate Manufactures Association Vs. the Official Liquidator
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction In the matter of :CA No.305 of 2008 CP No.525 of 2005 REHABILITATION INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD.(IN LIQN.) And ESTATE MANUFACTURES ASSOCIATION Vs THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR & In the matter of :CA No.497 of 2008 CP No.525 of 2005 REHABILITATION INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD.(IN LIQN.) And R.I.C.TENANTS (LEASE) ASSOCIATION Vs THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR & In the matter of :CA No.185 of 2009 CP No.525 of 2005 ASANSOL DURGAPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY And REHABILITATION INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD.(IN LIQN.) & In the matter of :CA No.836 of 2011 CP No.525 of 2005 REHABILITATION INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD.(IN LIQN.) & In the matter of :CA No.635 of 2012 CP No.525 of 2005 REHABILITATION INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD.(IN LIQN.) & In the matter of :CA No.841 of 2011 CP No.525 of 2005 BEHALA WEST (RIC) INDUSTRIAL ESTATE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION And THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR Appearance Mr.Satarup Banerjee, Adv.Mr.A.Mitra, Adv.Mr.Rajiv Lall, Adv.Mr.D.Dutta, Adv.M...
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
CA No.28 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE In the matter of: M/S.AURIO PHARMA LABORATORIES PVT LTD AND ANR. Appearance: Mr.M.S.Tiwari, Adv...for the applicant. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : March 1, 2013. The Court : That a separate meeting of the holders of the Equity Shares in the Transferor Company shall be convened and held at 11, Crooked Lane, Kolkat069. at 10.30 am on April 6, 2013 for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, approving with or without modification, a Scheme of Arrangement between the applicant companies and their respective shareholders for the purpose of demerger of a unit of the Transferor Company and the merger thereof with the Transferee Company. The Transferee Company is a group company of Transferor Company and has common and family shareholdeRs.Since all the shareholders have given consent in writing, the meeting of the shareholders of the Transferee Company is dispensed with. That at leas...
Limited Vs. Ashok Singh and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
AP No.677 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED -VersusASHOK SINGH & ANR. Appearance: Mr.Satarup Banerjee, Adv...for the petitioner. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date :March 1, 2013. The Court : The respondents are not represented despite previous service. The receiver has filed a report following the receivers second visit. It appears that the receiver was informed by or on behalf of the respondents in couRs.of receivers fiRs.visit that the two assets covered by the agreement were lying at the Bhilai Steel Plant and at the Jagatdal Electro Steel Plant. A subsequent visit undertaken by the receiver has revealed that there is no trace of either asset at either steel plant. The receiver is directed to appoint an agent to ascertain the whereabouts of the assets whereupon the receiver will forthwith proceed to take possession thereof. The receiver will be entitled to seek police assista...
Manoj Kumar Das Vs. Kakali Das
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
GA No.505 of 2013 TS 9 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE GOODS OF ASIM KUMAR DAS (DECEASED) AND IN THE MATTER OF : MAnot KUMAR DAS VERSUS KAKALI DAS BEFORE: THE HONBLE JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date :1. t March, 2013. For the plaintiff : Mr.Sakya Sen,Advocate Mr.Chanchal Dutta,Advocate Mr.Amritam Mondal,Advocate Ms.Krishna Mallick,Advocate For the defendant : Ms.Puja Das Chowdhury,Advocate Mr.Joydeep Roy,Advocate The Court :- The instant application is for appointment of a hand writing expert at the instance of the caveator. At the time of disclosure of documents the said Will was inspected. But no step was taken for the Will to be examined by a hand writing expert to have examine the signatures appearing on the said Will. The second attesting witness is already being cross examined. At this stage the instant application has been filed for appointment of a hand writing expert to give his opinion with regard to the signatures of Asim Kumar Das in the said Will. The app...
Uttar Pradesh State Spinning Co. Ltd. Vs. Ganpatlal Pawan Kumar and an ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
ORDER SHEET APO No.378 of 2004 With CS No.347 of 2002 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction UTTAR PRADESH STATE SPINNING Co.LTD.Versus GANPATLAL PAWAN KUMAR & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE DR.MRINAL KANTI CHAUDHURI Date :1. t March, 2013. Mr.Soumabha Ghose led by Mr.Pratap Chatterjee, Sr.Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Ajoy Krishna Chatterjee, Sr.Advocate, Mr.Aniruddha Roy, Mr.D.N. Sharma, Mr.R.K. Rai for the respondent. The Court : The parties entered into a contract under which the appellant, a public sector undertaking under the State of Uttar Pradesh appointed the appellant as handling agent. Clauses 28, 29 and 31 of the agreement being relevant here are quoted below : 28. That this Agreement shall be deemed to have been made and executed at Kanpur.29. That all disputes and differences arising out of this contract whether during the continuance of the contract or after its completion, abundonment shall be referred to the Chairman,...
Hdfc Bank Ltd. Vs. the Official Liqidator
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
CA No.174 of 2012 CP No.562 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE MATTER OF : Sr.Sr.ONKERSWARARICE MILL PVT LTD (LIQN) -AndHDFC BANK LTD.-VSTHE OFFICIAL LIQIDATOR Appearance: Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, Adv.Mr.Sukrit Mukherjee, Adv...for the petitioner. Mr.Sakya Sen, Adv.Mr.Suman Dutta, Adv.Mr.A.K.Sur, Adv.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : March 1, 2013. The Court : The land that had been mortgaged by the company (in liquidation) in favour of West Bengal Financial corporation has already been sold. The financial corporation confirms that the entire consideration of Rs.1.11 crore has been received and possession of the land made over to the purchaser. The application is by the petitioning creditor and the only order that is not sought is for a direction on the Official Liquidator to collect the books and records of the company (in liquidation) from the financial corporation since the financial corporation had taken possession of the p...
Saregama India Ltd. Vs. Viacom 18 Motion Pictures and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
TA No.29 of 2013 with T. No.62 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Saregama India LTD.Versus ViaCo.18 Motion Pictures & ORS.Before: The Honble Justice I.P.MUKERJ.Date:1. t March 2013 Appearance: Pratap Chatterjee, Sr.Advocate Mr.S.N. Mookerjee, Advocate Mr.Ranjan Bachawat, Advocate Mr.Debnath Ghosh, Advocate Mr.Gautam Banerjee, Advocate Mr.Sayan Roychoudhury, Advocate Mr.Shounak Mitra, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.J.K. Mitra, Sr.Advocate Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Advocate Mr.Jishnu Choudhury, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr.T.K. Bose, Sr.Advocate Mr.Suvasish Sengupta, Advocate for respondent No.2 This application at the New Motion. stage was heard by me for a considerable length of time. In my opinion, all the relevant papers are before the Court. Hence, there is no point in keeping this application pending, after passing or refusing an interim order and inviting affidavits to be filed. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, the prayer for...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »