Kolkata Court December 2013 Judgments
Sahaj Evillage Ltd Vs. Central Bank of India and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-30-2013
ORDER SHEET TA No.141 of 2013 T No.351 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SAHAJ E-VILLAGE LTD Versus CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI Date : 30th December, 2013. (Christmas Vacation) Appearance: Mr.Amitava Das, Adv.Mr.Santosh Kumar Roy, Adv.for the plaintiff Mr.Agniv Sinha, Adv.for the defendant no.1 The Court: The plaintiff/petitioner has submitted that he has made service of this application along with a copy of the plaint and notice of motion upon respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3. He has filed affidavit of service which may be kept with the record. Leave is granted to move this application in this suit filed by the plaintiff/petitioner. Since sufficient Court fees could not be put in by the plaintiff/petitioner. At the time of filing of the present suit, the learned Advocate- on-record for the petitioner is appointed Receiver to put in requisite deficit Court 2 fees on the reopening day of this C...
Tag this Judgment!Manoj Kumar Shaw Vs. State of West Bengal and ors
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-30-2013
ORDER SHEET WP No.1277 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE MANOJ KUMAR SHAW Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI Date : 30th December, 2013. (Christmas Vacation) Appearance: SK. Samim Akhtar, Adv.for the petitioner. Mr.Kamalesh Bhattacharya, Adv.Mr.Swapan Kr. Pal, Adv.for the respondent nos.5 and 6 The Court : This writ petition has been filed complaining of the inaction on the part of the concerned authority in not passing an appropriate order on the petitioners prayer for renewal which is said to have been submitted on 18th November, 2013. The said application is still pending without any decision. The petitioners apprehension is that the licence on the basis of which he is running his business will expire on 31st December, 2013. Mr.Bhattacharya, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the authority concerned, submits that the authority can consider the said application and pass a fina...
Tag this Judgment!Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-24-2013
ORDER SHEET C.P.No.840 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE MATTER OF : SUMAN COMMERCIAL PVT.LTD.AND REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, WEST BENGAL BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 24th December, 2013. Appearance : Mr.Jaydip Banerjee, Adv. for the U.O.I.The Court : The petition is for resurrecting a company which has been struck off the list of functioning companies under Section 560 (6) of the Companies Act, 1956 for the statutory records and documents not having been filed. The Registrar has filed a statement indicating therein that a total amount of Rs.40,000/- on account of filing fees, additional filing fees and penalty would be the due from the company to the Central Government if the statutory records not filed earlier were to be filed now. The petitioner accepts such position and is agreeable to pay the amount. Subject to the petitioner paying a sum of Rs.40,000/- to the Registrar of Companies within a fortnight from date, the Re...
Tag this Judgment!Chatterjee Petrochem (Mauritius) Co. Vs. West Bengal Industrial Develo ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-24-2013
TA No.136 of 2013 T. No.342 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDIANRY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Chatterjee Petrochem (Mauritius) Co.Versus West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation LTD.& ORS.Before: The Hon'ble Justice I.P.MUKERJ.Date: 24th December 2013 Appearance: Mr.A.K. Mitra, Sr.Advocate Mr.Sudipto Sarkar, Sr.Advocate Mr.Siddhartha Mitra, Sr.Advocate Ms.Mousumi Bhattacharya, Advocate Mr.S.Datta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.S.K. Kapur, Sr.Advocate Mr.Sanjay Ginodia, Advocate Mr.Ravi Kapur, Advocate Ms.P.S. Roy, Advocate for WBIDC Mr.Jishnu Saha, Advocate for HPL Mr.Bimal Chatterjee, Ld. Advocate General Mr.Mayank Mishra, Advocate Mr.Manoj Kr. Tiwari, Advocate for the Govt. of West Bengal The Court: List this application for further consideration on 7th January 2014 as New Motion. Today, learned Counsel for the plaintiffs/petitioner wanted an order of injunction from this Court restraining the defendants from giving any effect to the notice dated 10th October 2013 of ...
Tag this Judgment!Biswajit Maji and anr. Vs. Coal India Ltd. and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-24-2013
ORDER SHEET G.A.No.3741 of 2013 W.P.No.1190 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BISWAJIT MAJ.& ANR. Versus COAL INDIA LTD.& ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 24th December, 2013. Appearance : Mr.A.Lahiri, Adv.Mr.P.Ghosh, Adv.Mr.R.Majumdar, Adv.Ms.S.Barman Roy, Adv.Mr.P.Chatterjee, Adv.Mr.S.Banerjee, Adv.Md.A.Ali, Adv.The Court : This is an application for addition of a party at the instance of one of the aspirants who participated in the recruitment process. The applicant contends that the entire recruitment process is vitiated because of the alteration in rules in the midst of the said recruitment process. The applicant however, suggests that since the subject matter of this writ petition relates to the quashing and setting aside of the selection process any decision that may be taken in this writ petition may vitally affect his rights. There is no dispute that the applicant is one of the candidates who applied for t...
Tag this Judgment!Supriya Kumar Saha Vs. Union of India
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Original Side Present : The Honble Mr.Justice Ashim Kumar Banerjee And The Honble Mr.Justice Debangsu Basak A.P.O.No.329 of 2013 A.P.No.296 of 2007 SUPRIYA KUMAR SAHA versus UNION OF INDIA A.P.O.No.203 OF2013A.P.No.333 OF2007ASHOKA TUBEWELL & ENGINEERING CORPORATION versus UNION OF INDIA AND A.P.O No.207 OF2013A.P.No.333 of 2007 UNION OF INDIA versus M/S.ASHOKA TUBEWELL & ENGINEERING CORPORATION For the Appellant : Mr.Dipak Basu, Senior Advocate In APO No.329 of 2013 Mr.Susanta Dutta, Advocate For Union of India : Mr.Partha Sarathi Bose, Senior Advocate In APO No.329 of 2013 Ms.Aparna Banerjee, Advocate For Ashoka Tubewell : Mr.Ranjan Deb, Senior Advocate Mr.Dhruba Ghosh, Advocate Mr.Sarvapriya Mukherjee, Advocate Ms.Debomitra Adhikari, Advocate For Union of India In APO No.203 & 207 of 2013 : Mr.A.K.Ghosal, Senior Advocate Heard on : 2nd, 10th, 16th, 17th, 18th December, 2013 Judgment on : December 24, 2013 Mr.Rajendra Chaturv...
Tag this Judgment!Sumermal JaIn and Another Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, C ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE GA No.3413 of 2013 W.P.No.844 of 2013 SUMERMAL JAIN AND ANOTHER -VERSUSTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE XVI, KOLKATA AND OTHERS For the PetitioneRs.Mr Anindya Mitra, Sr Adv., Mr J.P.Khaitan, Sr Adv., Ms Manju Agarwal, Adv.For the Respondents: Mr S.K.Kapur, Sr Adv., Mr Ravi Kapur, Adv.Hearing concluded on: December 23, 2013. BEFORE SANJIB BANERJEE, Judge Date: December 24, 2013. SANJIB BANERJEE, J. : In some ways this petition epitomises how resourceful litigants hold the judicial system to ransom and subvert due process if the slightest uncomfortable question is posed as to the manner of their amassing the wealth they flaunt. The observations herein should be confined to the limited import of the issues raised in the present proceedings and should not spill over to prejudice the petitioners elsewhere; but it cannot be missed that the petitioners have invited the decision and the ramifica...
Tag this Judgment!Mita Halder Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-24-2013
ORDER SHEET WP No.908 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE MITA HALDER Versus KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 24th December, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Alok Ghosh, Adv.Mr.Barin Banerjee, Adv.Mr.Debangshu Mondal, Adv.MRS.Suvasree Ghosh, Adv.The Court: After hearing the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as the Municipal Corporation this Court feels that in the interest of justice the Municipal Corporation shall re-hear the objection filed by the petitioner after giving reasonable opportunities of hearing to the parties and shall make all endeavour to dispose of the said objection within four weeks from the date of conclusion of hearing by passing a reasoned order which shall be communicated to the parties within a week thereafter. It is made clear that I have not gone into the merits of the order passed by the Municipal Commissioner. This order is passed in view of the submission made on ...
Tag this Judgment!Magma Fincorp Limited Vs. M/S. R. L. Behani and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-24-2013
GA No.3587 of 2013 AP No.871 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE MAGMA FINCORP LIMITED Versus M/S.R.L. BEHANI & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 24th December, 2013. Appearance: Mr.P.Sinha, Adv..for the petitioner Mr.S.Dutta, Adv.The Court : The petitioner seeks recalling of the order dated November 27, 2013 by which the sale of three tippers was confirmed in favour of Rajesh Show at Rs.24 lakh. Advocate for the respondents was attempted to be served, but the respondents have not been served. Rajesh Show has been served and it is submitted that since the sale has already been confirmed by the relevant order, the matter should not be reopened. The Receiver who is present in Court confirms that though the relevant instruments for payment have been tendered by Rajesh Show, they have not been encashed yet. The petitioner says that since the present offer is of about Rs.48 lakh for the three assets that had been sol...
Tag this Judgment!Oster Trading Private Limited Vs. the Registrar of Companies, West Ben ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-23-2013
ORDER SHEET CP No.of 820 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Original Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE IN THE MATTER OF : OSTER TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED Versus THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, WEST BENGAL BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 23rd December, 2013. The Court: The petition is for resurrecting a company which has been struck off the list of functioning companies under Section 560 (6) of the Companies Act, 1956 for the statutory records and documents not having been filed. The Registrar has filed a statement indicating therein that a total amount of Rs.40,000/- on account of filing fees, additional fees and penalty would be the due from the company to the Central Government if the statutory records not filed earlier were to be filed now. The petitioner accepts such position and is agreeable to pay the amount. Subject to the petitioner paying a sum of Rs.40,000/- to the Registrar of Companies within a fortnight from date, the Registrar will restore the name of the company t...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »