Skip to content

Kolkata Court October 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Oct 03 2013

Debasree Basu Mallik Vs. Kmc and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-03-2013

ORDER SHEET W.P.833 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE DEBASREE BASU MALLIK Versus KMC & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA Date: 3rd October, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Aloke Ghosh, Adv.Mr.Subrata Datta, Adv.Ms.Kuheli Sinha, Adv. for the petitioners Mr.Biswajit Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Swapan Debmnath, Adv. for the KMC The Court: Admittedly, the petitioner had been carrying on business activity by using her Premises No.4A, Short Street, Kolkata 700017 as ceremonial house after obtaining certificate of enlistment and/or renewal thereof till 2005-06. Thereafter, the certificate of enlistment was not renewed by the petitioner. The petitioner alleges that since the Municipal Authority stopped demanding payment of any amount towards renewal fees for running the ceremonial house in the said premises since 2006-07, the petitioner could neither pay fees and charges for using the said premises as ceremonial house after 2005-06 nor the ce...


Oct 03 2013

M/S. Krishi Rasayan Exports Pvt. Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-03-2013

ORDER SHEET WP1020OF2013IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.KRISHI RASAYAN EXPORTS PVT.Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 3rd October, 2013. Appearance : Mr.Somak Basu, Adv.Mr.S.Mukherjee, Adv. for the Advocate General The Court : The petitioners have sought for declaration that the provisions of the West Bengal Tax On Entry of Goods Into Local Areas Act, 2012 and the Rules made thereunder are ultra vires and be declared as null and void. In one of the writ petitions being W.P.11407(W) of 2012 the vires of the provisions of the said Act was also challenged and by a judgment dated 24-06-2013 the Honble Single Bench declared the provisions of the said Act as ultra vires. The State respondents who are represented, submit that the said judgment is carried in an appeal before the Division Bench in M.A.T.1107 of 2013 and the Honble Division Bench has directed the matter to be listed on 12th Novemb...


Oct 03 2013

Gopal Ji Shaw and anr. Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-03-2013

ORDER SHEET W.P.No.791 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE GOPAL J.SHAW & ANR. Versus KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA Date: 3rd October, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Alok Ghosh, Adv.Mr.Debashis Saha, Adv.Miss. Dipika Banu, Adv. for the petitioners Mr.Biswajit Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Debngshu Mondal, Adv. for the KMC The Court: After hearing the learned Advocates of the parties and after considering the materials on record this Court feels that the dispute which is involved in this writ petition is required to be considered after exchange of affidavits between the parties. Accordingly, on the prayer of Mr.Mukherjee, learned Advocate appearing for the Municipal Authority, leave is granted to the respondents to file affidavit-in-opposition to this writ petition within three weeks after the reopening of the Court after the puja vacation; reply, if any, be filed by the petitioners within a week thereaf...


Oct 03 2013

Madanlall Agarwal and ors. Vs. Puranmull Agarwal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-03-2013

ORDER SHEET GA NO.3075 OF2013WITH CS NO.154 OF2013IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE MADANLALL AGARWAL & ORS.Versus PURANMULL AGARWAL & ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date : 3rd October, 2013. Mr.U.Bose, Mr.B.M.Bagariafor petitioner/defendant nos.6,7,8,9&22. Ms.M.Agarwal, Mr.B.Manotfor plaintiffs. Mr.P.K.Roy, Mr.A.Banerjeefor respondent nos.1,2,10,17&18. Mr.D.Basak, Mr.D.Roy Chowdhury for respondent nos.11 to 16. Mr.S.Ghosh, Ms.R.Royfor respondent nos.3 to 5, 19,20,21,23 to26. The Court : This application has been filed by respondent no.7 alleging that respondent no.5, who had appointed him as munim for Radhika International, the respondent no.23 is now seeking to withdraw his signature in respect of the bank account wherein it was previously valid. The respondent no.5 submits that the respondent no.7 was allowed to operate the said account for a limited purpose but the said powers have been misused by making offers in tenders an...


Oct 03 2013

Poddar Sons Ex.L Private Limited Vs. C.i.T., Kolkataiii

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-03-2013

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax].ORIGINAL SIDE GA No.2852 of 2013 ITA No.98 of 2010 PODDAR SONS EX.L PRIVATE LIMITED Versus C.I.T., KOLKATA-III BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE ISHAN CHANDRA DAS Date : 3rd October, 2013. For Appellant : Mr.D.K. Shome with Mrs.A.Qureshi and Mr.F.Gaffar, Advocates For Respondent : Ms.Anjana Das, Advocate The Court : On 30th September, 2011 a Division Bench of this Court stayed the operation of the letter dated 14th September, 2011 issued by the Tax Recovery Officer claiming payment Division of the Bench certificated stipulated demand in its of Rs.21,41,592/-. order that during The the pendency of the appeal the demand should remain stayed. The Division Bench obviously was of the view that the appeal would be heard out at an early date. The appeal, it appeaRs.was not heard out and is still pending. The learned Advocate for the appellant is present. The learned Advocate for the ...


Oct 03 2013

Manjulata Shaw and ors. Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-03-2013

ORDER SHEET W.P.No.792 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE MANJULATA SHAW & ORS.Versus KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA Date: 3rd October, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Alok Ghosh, Adv.Mr.Debashis Saha, Adv.Miss. Dipika Banu, Adv. for the petitioners Mr.Biswajit Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Debngshu Mondal, Adv. for the KMC The Court: After hearing the learned Advocates of the parties and after considering the materials on record this Court feels that the dispute which is involved in this writ petition is required to be considered after exchange of affidavits between the parties. Accordingly, on the prayer of Mr.Mukherjee, learned Advocate appearing for the Municipal Authority, leave is granted to the respondents to file affidavit-in-opposition to this writ petition within three weeks after the reopening of the Court after the puja vacation; reply, if any, be filed by the petitioners within a week therea...


Oct 03 2013

M/S. Manisha Creations Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-03-2013

ORDER SHEET WP1019OF2013IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.MANISHA CREATIONS Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 3rd October, 2013. Appearance : Mr.Somak Basu, Adv.Mr.S.Mukherjee, Adv. for the Advocate General The Court : The petitioners have sought for declaration that the provisions of the West Bengal Tax On Entry of Goods Into Local Areas Act, 2012 and the Rules made thereunder are ultra vires and be declared as null and void. In one of the writ petitions being W.P.11407(W) of 2012 the vires of the provisions of the said Act was also challenged and by a judgment dated 24-06-2013 the Honble Single Bench declared the provisions of the said Act as ultra vires. The State respondents who are represented, submit that the said judgment is carried in an appeal before the Division Bench in M.A.T.1107 of 2013 and the Honble Division Bench has directed the matter to be listed on 12th November, 2013 ...


Oct 03 2013

Suresh Kumar JaIn and anr. Vs. Kamlesh Sogani and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-03-2013

ORDER SHEET GA No.3073 of 2013 CS No.362 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SURESH KUMAR JAIN & ANR. Versus KAMLESH SOGANI & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date: 3rd October, 2013 Appearance Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Adv.with Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, Adv.Mr.S.Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Soumabho Ghosh, Adv.Mr.A.Agarwalla, Adv.Mr.Ahin Chowdhury, Sr.Adv with Mr.S.N. Mitra, Sr.Adv.Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee, Adv.Mr.Asish Chakraborty, Adv.Ms.Sananda Mukhopadhyay, Adv.In a suit for perpetual injunction restraining the defendant nos.2 to 4 from certifying the award dated 3rd January, 2013, this application has been filed for interim relief. The case of the petitioner is that proceedings were filed before the Alipore Court and it is only from the criminal proceeding he has come to know of the award dated 3rd January, 2013 which is the subject matter of proceedings filed under Section 34 of the 1996 Act. The petitioner has come to know that defendant no.1, ...


Oct 03 2013

M/S. Echo Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Gurukul Art and Media Pvt. ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-03-2013

ORDER SHEET CS No.35 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.ECHO ENTERTAINMENT PVT.LTD.Versus M/S.GURUKUL ART & MEDIA PVT.LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 3rd October, 2013. Appearance: Mr.Deb Kr. Sen, Adv.The Court : The plaintiff has filed the suit for recovery of money against the defendant. The plaintiff claims to be the owner of a televised serial, namely Mahaprabhu Sr.Krishna Chaitanya running into 445 episodes. The defendant agreed to act as a distributor of the aforesaid televised serial on terms and conditions reduced to writing and executed on August 25, 2012. The plaintiff states that the said agreement is an agreement of assignment of the right, title or interest of the plaintiff in connection with the aforesaid Mega T.V.Serial Mahaprabhu Sr.Krishna Chaitanya for a period of 5 years upon payment of consideration of Rs.26,70,000/- as a consideration for assignment of such right, title of interest of the p...


Oct 03 2013

Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-03-2013

ORDER SHEET WP1007OF2013IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LTD Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 3rd October, 2013. Appearance : Mr.Binod Poddar, Adv.Mr.Samit Gadolia, Adv.Mr.S.Mukherjee, Adv. for the Advocate General The Court : The Court : The petitioners have sought for declaration that the provisions of the West Bengal Tax On Entry of Goods Into Local Areas Act, 2012 and the Rules made thereunder are ultra vires and be declared as null and void. In one of the writ petitions being W.P.11407(W) of 2012 the vires of the provisions of the said Act was also challenged and by a judgment dated 24-062013 the Honble Single Bench declared the provisions of the said Act as ultra vires. The State respondents who are represented, submit that the said judgment is carried in an appeal before the Division Bench in M.A.T.1107 of 2013 and the Honble Division Bench has directed the matter ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial