Kolkata Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bright Advertising Private Ltd Vs. the Statesman Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-03-2012
1 ORDER SHEET APO No.146 of 2012 ACO No.74 of 2012 CA No.386 of 2006 CP No.107 of 2003 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BRIGHT ADVERTISING PRIVATE LTD Versus THE STATESMAN LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHUKLA KABIR (SINHA) Date :3. d July, 2012. Appearance: Mr.Sakya Sen and Mr.Suvadeep Sen, Advocates For the appellant. Mr.Supriya Ranjan Saha, Advocate For the respondent. The Court :- On April 23, 1999 a proposal was noted by and on behalf of the Company to enter into a contract with the appellant to the extent that the appellant would be procuring business for the company in exchange of commission at the agreed rate. The appellant would also keep a security deposit to the extent of Rs.50 lacs to be refunded on March 31, 2000. The deposit would accrue interest @ 1.8% per month payable at the end of each English calendar month. As per the agreement entered into through the said proposal contained in the lett...
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-03-2012
ORDER SHEET W.P.No.204 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SAMIR MUKHERJEE & ORS.Plaintiff/Petitioner/Applicant Versus KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.Defendant/Respondent BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL Date :3. d July, 2012. For Petitioner :Mr.Barin Banerjee,Advocate Mr.C.K.Saha,Advocate For KMC: Mr.Achintya Banerjee,Advocate Ms.Piyali Sengupta,Advocate The Court : In the writ petition, the petitioner, who is a resident of premises no.293/2 Diamond Harbour Road, Kolkata- 700034, has prayed for a direction upon the authorities of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation, to take steps against the construction allegedly raised by the private respondent no.4 at premises no.293/4, Diamond Harbour Road which is adjacent to his premises since, construction has been made by encroaching on the private common passage and the garage has been converted into a commercial space. Submission has been made that since a representation dated 12th ...
…appellant/Petitioner Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata Iv ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-03-2012
G.A.No.3162 of 2011 CEXA No.1 of 2008 In the High Court at Calcutta Special Jurisdiction (Central Excise) Original Side Present : The Honble Justice J.N.Patel, Chief Justice And The Honble Justice Dr. Sambuddha Chakrabarti Madura Coats Private Limited Appellant/Petitioner Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata IV Commissionerate Respondent For the Appellant For the Respondent Heard on Judgment on : Mr.J.P.Khaitan, Senior Advocate Mr.Partha Banerjee, Advocate : Mr.N.C.Roy Chowdhury, Senior Advocate Mr.K.K.Maity : June 26, 2012 : July 3, 2012 J.N.Patel, C.J.: This is an application seeking clarification and/or modification of the judgment and order dated August 12, 2011 passed by this Court (Honble Justice Bhaskar Bhattacharya and Honble Justice Dr. Sambuddha Chakrabarti) in CEXA No.1 of 2008. It is the case of the petitioner that it had preferred an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated June 15, 2007 passed by the CustoMs.Excise and Ser...
MartIn Vs. the Board of Acting Governors of La
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-03-2012
ORDER SHEET G.A.NO.824 OF 201.C.S.NO.26 OF 188.IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE CHRISTOPHER MARTIN, MARIA DESGRANGERS MARTIN Versus THE BOARD OF ACTING GOVERNORS OF LA MARTINIERE, KOLKATA BEFORE: The Honble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :3. d July, 2012. Appearance: Ranjan Deb, Senior Advocate, Mr.Ashish Chakraborty,Mr.Anjan Deb Sarkar, Advocate For petitioner Mr.Aniruddha Roy, Advocate for Jain Group Projects PVT.LTD.The Court : This is an application by the Board of Acting governors of La Martiniere, Kolkata. On 29th December, 2006, the Board acquired 960 cottahs of land at Rajarhat for expansion of the school. They bought this property for or about Rs.5,57,76,000/-. Now, it appears that sufficient space has become available in the girls school campus. Occupants of the Group D staff quarters have left. For this reason, in the meeting of the Board held on 7th December, 2011 it was decided that the school did not need the Rajarhat property and ...
M/S. Tirumala Infracon Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sohna Singh
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-03-2012
AP No.304 of 2012 AP No.412 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.TIRUMALA INFRACo.PVT.LTD.-VersusSOHNA SINGH Appearance: Mr.Samba Chakraborty, Adv...for the petitioner. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : July 3, 2012. The Court : The respondent has refused to accept service as would be evident from the affidavit of service filed by the petitioner. The petitioner in this request under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, entered into an agreement on May 24, 2011 with the respondent for the purchase of two flats in Alipore. The agreement contains an arbitration clause that provides for the reference of the disputes thereunder to the arbitration of one Gopal Bagree. Upon disputes and differences having arisen between the parties, the petitioner requested the named arbitrator to take up the reference. A letter to such effect was issued on December 16, 2011 and a copy thereof marked to the responden...
Suresh Kumar Agarwal Vs. the Official Liquidator and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-03-2012
CA No.430 of 2012 CP No.306 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION IN THE MATTER OF : SHIVAM EDIBLE PVT LTD -ANDSURESH KUMAR AGARWAL -VSTHE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR & ANR. Appearance: Mr.D.Basak, Adv.Mr.Satarup Banerjee, Adv.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date :3. d July, 2012. The Court : The application is under Section 466 of the Companies Act for permanent stay of the order of winding up. The persons in control of the company, as contributories, have made the application. The Official Liquidator is present and says that in view of the application for permanent stay having been made, the Official Liquidator had not taken steps in the matter prior to the application being moved for the fiRs.time. The Official Liquidator has since made an inventory of the assets of the company in liquidation. The application under Section 466 of the Act has been advertised and none appears to oppose the same. The petitioning creditor is represented and two demand drafts of...
Space Matrix Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Additional Director General, Directorate of ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-03-2012
WP No.316 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction SPACE MATRIX PVT.LTD.Versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL, DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE & ORS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE Date : JULY 3 2012. Appearance: Mr.Sudhir Mehta, Adv.Mr.Kaushik Dey, Adv.The Court : Mr.Dey appearing on behalf of the respondents makes an oral submission praying that the interim order passed by this Court be vacated. It is submitted that the petitioners have clandestinely removed and sold consignments and evaded duty on imported goods to the tune of Rs.1 crore. Unfortunately, as of date there is no demand. Till date no show-cause notice has been issued. As recorded in the order dated June 20, 2012, under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 there is no provision for attachment of bank accounts and/or freezing of bank operations pending investigation. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has referred to Section 142A of the Customs Act whic...
M/S. Shree Niwas Ramgopal and ors. Vs. the Director of Consumer Goods ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-03-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA (CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION) ORIGINAL SIDE WP No.758 of 2010 With GA No.2914 of 2010 M/s. Shree Niwas Ramgopal & Ors. Vs. The Director of Consumer Goods & Ors. CORAM : The Honble Mr. Justice Tapen Sen For the Petitioners : Mr. L.C. Bihani, Sr. Advocate Mr. Kumar Gupta, Advocate Mrs. Nibedita Pal, Advocate Mr. Ramesh Dhara, Advocate For the I.O.C. : Mr. M.S. Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. P.K. Dutta, Advocate Mr. Shakya Sen, Advocate For the Respondent No.9 : Mr. Supriyo Chattapadhyay, Advocate For the Respondent No.10 : Mr. Sandip Maity, Advocate Heard On :17. 1.11, 15.2.11, 23.2.11, 25.2.11, 5.4.11, 11.4.11, 18.4.11, 4.5.11, 2.2.12, 7.2.12, 14.2.12, 15.3.12, 30.3.12 C.A.V. on :30. 3.2012 Judgment Delivered on :3. d July, 2012 Tapen Sen, J.: In this Writ Petition, the Petitioners pray for a Declaration declaring that Clause 1.5 of the Policy Guidelines dated 1.12.2008 (page 87 of the Writ Petition) be declared to be contrary to the provisions of...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›