Kolkata Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chamurchi Agro (India) Limited Vs. Surendra Nagar Tea Estate Private L ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
1 ORDER SHEET APO No.47 of 2012 CP No.531 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE CHAMURCHI AGRO (INDIA) LIMITED Versus SURENDRA NAGAR TEA ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHUKLA KABIR (SINHA) Date :5. h July, 2012. Appearance: Mr.Sakya Sen, Advocate with Mr.Sanjoy Jhunjhunwala, Advocate For the appellant Mr.Reetobroto Mitra with Mr.A.Mitra, Advocates For the respondent. The Court :- Surendra Nagar Tea Estate entered into an agreement with Chamurchi Agro (India) Limited for supply of green tea. As per agreement Surrendra was to supply green tea leaves weighing about 1000 to 7500 Kg. in a day. Subsequently, the quantum was reduced to 5000 Kg. The Company claims that they were regularly supplying and never defaulted. Such contention is, however, denied by Chamurchi Agro, the appellant. Under the agreement a sum of Rs.10 lacs was kept in deposit by Chamurchi with Surrendra to be adjusted against the tr...
Mow Chong Tennery Private Limited Vs. Elegant Fashion Fibre Chemicals ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
1 ORDER SHEET APO No.24 of 2012 CP No.68 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE MOW CHONG TENNERY PRIVATE LIMITED Versus ELEGANT FASHION FIBRE CHEMICALS LTD & ANR BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHUKLA KABIR (SINHA) Date :5. h July, 2012. Appearance: Mr.Mouima Khan, Advocate For the appellant. Mr.A.K. Ghosh and Mr.B.Tasheen Ahmed, Advocates For the respondents. The Court :- Parties entered into an agreement for supply of chemicals. It is not clear from the petition, what is the exact date of start of supply. We even find that the respondents established their claim on the basis of an opening balance as on April 01, 2009 to the extent of Rs.4,92,891/-. The statement set out in pages 10 to 13 would show that in the financial year April 01, 2009 to March 31, 2010 there had been series of transactions. We find payment being forthcoming as a lumpsum amount. Last date of payment that was received in the said year ...
Mahendra Pratap Soni Vs. Canara Bank and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
ORDER SHEET WP No.345 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE MAHENDRA PRATAP SONI Versus CANARA BANK & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA Date:5. h July, 2012 Mr.K.C. Garg, Adv..for the petitioner Mr.Ayan Boral, Adv..for the respondents The petitioner approached this Court with this writ petition on 19th April, 2012 after possession of the secured assets were taken over by the respondent-bank by exercising power conferred by Section 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the Act.) read with Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner has a remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal having jurisdiction under Section 17 (1) of the Act and particularly in view of the decisions of the Supreme Court reported in (2010) 8 SCC 11.and (2011) 2 SCC 782.I am not inclined to entertain ...
Keventer Agro Ltd. Vs. Amit Kumar Dhara
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
ORDER SHEET GA No.1629 of 2012 CS No.207 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE KEVENTER AGRO LTD.Versus AMIT KUMAR DHARA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :5. h July, 2012. Appearance: Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, Advocate Mr.S.Mukherjee, Advocate Ms.S.Swayka, Advocate The Court: This is an application for judgement upon admission together with a prayer for attachment before judgement. It was moved on 28th June, 2012, when an order was passed, after appreciating the prima facie case of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from operating the bank accounts mentioned in paragraph 22 of the petition without leaving a sum of Rs.41 lakhs as balance. If such balance was not available then he would not be able to deal with the immovable properties mentioned in paragraph 21 of the petition. On the returnable date of the application i.e.on 2nd July, 2012, learned Counsel for the defendant prayed for leave to retire submitting before this C...
Commissioner of Incometax, Kolkataxxi, Kolkata Vs. Rajesh Kumar Garg
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Original Side Present : The Honble Justice Sengupta And The Honble Justice Asim Kumar Mondal 05.07.2012 ITAT 9 of 2012 GA 136.of 2012 Commissioner of Income-tax, Kolkata-XXI, Kolkata versus Rajesh Kumar Garg The Court :- We have heard Smt. Soma Chatterjee, learned counsel for the appellant. We have gone through the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal dated 5th August, 2011 in relation to Assessment Year 2006-07. We found the present appeal is sought to be admitted on the following suggested questions of law :a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has erred in law in deleting the addition of Rs.28,01,585/- under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in spite of the fact that not filing of Form No.15J as required under Section 194C(i ) (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 29D of Income Tax Rules, 1962 ?. b) Whether on the facts and ...
Hinduja Leyland Finance Limited Vs. Ronit Nirman Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-05-2012
ORDER SHEET GA No.796 of 2012 AP No.448 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction HINDUJ.LEYLAND FINANCE LIMITED Versus RONIT NIRMAN PVT.LTD.& ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date :5. h July, 2012. Mr.Arif Ali for the petitioner. Ms.Yogita Gaurisaria, Advocate/Receiver appeaRs.The Court : This day matter has appeared in the list to ascertain whether payment has been made by the successful bidder Mr.Saroj Kumar Jaiswal. The Receiver informs this Court that by letter dated 28th June, 2012 Mr.Jaiswal has expressed his desire not to pursue the offer made. This intimation is after passing of the order dated 21st June, 2012 and not prior thereof. As one of the clause in the terms and conditions of sale related to forfeiture, the earnest money deposited by Mr.Saroj Kumar Jaiswal be forfeited and the demand draft given by him in favour of the petitioner be encashed. The letter dated 28th June, 2012 be kept on record. The Receiver has also been informe...
Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,re
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-04-2012
ORDER SHEET W.P.No.1347 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE VODAFONE ESSAR EAST LTD.Versus THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE/CIRCLE-7, KOLKATA & ORS.Petitioner Respondent BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE Date :4. h July, 2012. For Petitioner : Ms.Anupa Banerjee, Adv.For Respondent : Mr.D.K.Shome, Sr.Adv.with Mr.Prithu Dudhoria, Adv.This writ application was filed inter alia challenging the jurisdiction of the Income Tax authorities to initiate proceedings for reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax, 1961 for the assessment year 2004-05. While the writ application was pending adjudication, an order of reassessment was passed. The order could not, however, be communicated to the petitioner, by reason of an interim order passed by this Court in Vacation on 30th December, 2009, which has from time to time been extended. By the aforementioned interim order, this Court (S. Pal, J.) granted liberty to the Assis...
The Statesman Ltd. Vs. Nevatia Udyog Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-04-2012
Form not J.(2) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Original Side Present : The Honble Mr.Justice Ashim Kumar Banerjee And The Honble Mr.Justice Shukla Kabir Sinha A.P.O.No.247 of 2011 A.P.O.No.140 of 2012 A.P.O.No.141 of 2012 A.P.O.No.142 of 2012 The Statesman LTD.-VersusNevatia Udyog LTD.And M/S.Nevatia Udyog -VersusThe Statesman Limited And Nathmal Nevatia (HUF) -VersusThe Statesman Limited And Chitra Nevatia -VersusThe Statesman Limited For the Appellant : Mr.S.B.Mukherjee (Sr.Advocate) Mr.Supriyo Ranjan Saha (Advocate) Mr.Anindya Basu (Advocate) (in A.P.O.No.247 of 2011) For the Respondents : Mr.S.K.Kapoor (Sr.Advocate) Mr.Ratnanko Banerjee (Advocate) Mr.Raghunath Ghosh (Advocate) Mr.Jayanta Mukherjee (Advocate) (in A.P.O.No.247 of 2011 & For the Appellants (in A.P.O.No.140 of 2012 & A.P.O.No.141 of 2012) Heard on : June 26, 2012 Judgment on : July 4, 2012. ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE.J.All four appeals would relate to winding up petitions filed by four different pe...
C.i.T., Kolkataii, Kolkata Vs. M/S. G.M.M. Co. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-04-2012
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax].ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT No.102 of 2012 GA No.1408 of 2012 C.I.T., KOLKATA-II, KOLKATA Versus M/S.G.M.M.Co.LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA A n d The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASIM KUMAR MONDAL Date :4. h July, 2012. The Court : We have heard the learned Advocate for the appellant and have gone through the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal which relates to assessment year 2006-07. This appeal is sought to be admitted on the following suggested questions of law: a].Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax, Appellate Tribunal erred in law in upholding the order of C.I.T.(A) in deleting the addition of Rs.27,08,528/- made the Assessing Officer from the total Fringe Benefit Value?. b].Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax, Appellate Tribunal erred in law in upholding the order of C.I.T.(A) in deleting the addition of Rs.37,70,...
Ansarali Tarafdar and anr. Vs. Citi Financial Consumer Finance India L ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-04-2012
GA No.1412 of 2012 AP No.802 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE ANSARALI TARAFDAR & ANR. Versus CITI FINANCIAL CONSUMER FINANCE INDIA LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date :4. h July, 2012. Appearance: Mr.Sanjay Saha, Adv.Mr.Arif Ali, Adv.The Court : GA No.1412 of 2012 is for restoration of GA No.509 of 2012. GA No.509 of 2012 was an application for restoration of AP No.802 of 2010 which was a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in respect of an immovable property situate outside jurisdiction. GA No.509 of 2012 appears to have been dismissed on April 19, 2012. The matter thereafter appeared by mistake on May 14, 2012 and was dismissed all over again. The Registrar, Original Side will look into the circumstances in which an application that already stood dismissed could appear in the list or be taken up again. In view of the fact that AP No.802 of 2010 could not have been filed in th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »