Kolkata Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Uma Forging Works (Pvt) Ltd. and anr. Vs. the West Bengal State E ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-07-2012
ORDER SHEET WP NO.400 OF 200.IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.UMA FORGING WORKS (PVT.LTD.& ANR. Versus THE WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI Date :7. h May, 2012. Appearance : Mr.Purnasish Gupta, Adv., Mr.J.Mukherjee, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr.Sumit Panja, Adv., Mr.Srijan Nayak, Adv., Mr.Raja Saha, Adv., for the respondent. The Court : The writ petitioners challenge the impugned memo dated 4th December, 2003 whereby the respondent no.2 has called upon Rs.32,18,710/- the as petitioners outstanding to dues deposit on account a sum of of annual minimum guaranteed revenue (hereinafter referred to as AMGR) for the years 1996-97, 97-98, 98-99, 99-2000 and 2000-2001) in terms of the order passed by this Court in WP No.2111 of 2001. The factual matrix giving rise to the instant litigation is as follows : On or about 21st February, 1986 an agreement was executed between the petitioners and the...
Sri Manoj Sarkar Vs. Chandi Bala Dasi
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-2012
Prasenjit Mandal, J. These two applications are at the instance of the defendant and are directed against the orders dated March 15, 2011 and March 30, 2011 passed by the learned Judge, Presidency Small Causes Court, 6th Bench, Calcutta in SCC Suit No.436 of 2007. In C.O. No.983 of 2011, the defendant challenged the rejection of his application for appointment of a handwriting expert for examination of documents (rent receipts) already exhibited by a handwriting expert. While the said application is pending before this Hon’ble Court, by the order dated March 30, 2011, the learned Trial Judge has decreed the suit. So, the second application has been filed. So far as the application being C.O. No.1350 of 2011 is concerned, I find that this application is against the judgment and order passed by the learned Trial Judge thereby decreeing the SCC Suit No.436 of 2007 on contest. The plaintiff got a decree for delivery of possession of the premises in suit by the order dated March 30, 2...
Kush Chandra Barman Vs. the State of West Bengal and Others
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-2012
The petitioner is an AssistantTeacher of Boro Balaram Lal Behari Vidyamandir, Burdwan. He was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in Social Science Group on 23rd March, 1993 as a Pass Graduate with Geography. Subsequently, he passed M.A. examination in History through correspondence course from the University of Burdwan in 1997. His prayer for higher scale of pay for his enhanced qualification was rejected by the District Inspector of Schools (S.E.), Burdwan, on 18th May, 2005. The said order of the District Inspector of Schools, which is appearing at page 35 of the writ petition, is under challenge in this application at the instance of the said Assistant Teacher. The District Inspector of Schools held that higherscale of pay cannot be granted to the petitioner as he did not improve his qualification after taking prior permission from the school authority. The District Inspector of Schools also held that since the school authority did not allow the petitioner to take classes in History ...
Ganesh Dutt Sharma Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-2012
Kanchan Chakraborty, J. 1) This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal for quashing of the proceedings in Case No. 3 of 2001 arising out of Crime No. R.C. 52/07-Cal dated 28.11.1997 under Sections 420/120B of the Indian Penal code read with Section 13(2) and 13(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act pending in the Court learned Judge, Special Court No. 5 at Calcutta. 2) One R. A. Prasad, Deputy Zonal Manager, F.C.I, Calcutta Zone entered into a Criminal conspiracy with M/s Prakash Road Lines Corporation and others in the year 1994 and in furtherance of said conspiracy, issued work orders dishonestly in favour of M/s Prakash Road Lines Corporation for transportation of foodgrains from the food supply depots of F.C.I. in Bihar to various North East Regions at a lower rate breaking the norms and procedure and thereby they caused wrongful loss to tune of Rs. 1,07,13,524.74 and consequential wrongful gain to themselves. It was alleged also that the accused persons had v...
Smt. Bela Sinha Vs. Motilal Rakshit
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-2012
Prasenjit Mandal, J. This application is at the instance of the defendant No.2 and is directed against the Order dated June 28, 2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, 3rd Court, Howrah in Title Suit No.83 of 1999 thereby allowing the prayer for local inspection, to hold partition, commission for allotment, valuation and demarcation of the suit property, etc. The plaintiff/opposite party herein instituted a suit being Title Suit No.83 of 1999 for the partition and other reliefs. The defendant is contesting the said suit. The plaintiff filed two applications, one under Order 39 Rule 7 of the CPC dated May 23, 2002 and another under Order 26 Rule 9 of the CPC dated May 18, 2006. By the impugned order, the learned Trial Judge appointed the Commissioner to hold partition, commission for allotment, valuation and demarcation of the suit property. Being aggrieved by such orders, the defendant No.2 has preferred this application. Now, the question is whether the impugned order...
Commissioner of Centreal Excise,cal.Vi Vs. M/S. Visuvious India Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-2012
ORDER SHEET CEXA NO.16 OF 200.GA NO.4537 OF 200.IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE COMMISSIONER OF CENTREAL EXCISE,CAL.-VI Versus M/S.VISUVIOUS INDIA LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASIM KR. MONDAL Date :4. h May, 2012. The Court : This is an application for condonation of delay of about 579 days. This matter was filed in the year 2004 and no steps were taken by the department to bring it in the list. The officials of the department and of this court got the matter enlisted for it being dealt with in a proper manner. On April 24, 2012, the matter came up in the list and was adjourned till May 2, 2012. When the matter again appeared in the list on May 2, 2012, it was adjourned till May 4, 2012. Before that, the matter was placed in the list on February 27, 2012. The matter was then adjourned till March 12, 2012 and then again on March 27, 2012 on which date the directions for filing 2 affidavits were given. ...
Vs. State of West Bengal and ors..Responden
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-2012
ORDER SHEET W.P.No.295 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SUNIL KUMAR RAI .Petitioner .Respondents Versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE JYOTIRMAY BHATTACHARYA Date :4. h May, 2012. Mr.S.P.Jana, Adv.for the petitioner. Mr.P.S.Deb Barman, Adv.for Respondent Nos.4 and 5 Mr.Amitesh Banerjee, Adv.for the State The Court : On perusal of this writ petition, this Court finds that by an earlier order dated 20th September, 2007 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.890 of 2007, the concerned District Inspector of Schools was directed to consider the petitioners prayer for approval within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of the said order. By the said order the Administrator of the school was also directed to make available all the papers pertaining to the service of the petitioner and co-operate with the District Inspector of Schools with a rider that if any of the papers is not se...
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-2012
ORDER SHEET W.P.No.25 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE GHULAM MOHIUDDIN CHOUDHURY & ORS.Plaintiff/Petitioner Versus THE K.M.C.& ORS Defendant/Respondent BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL Date :4. h May, 2012. For Plaintiff/Petitioner : MR.S.S.BOSE,ADVOCATE MR.S.BANERJEE,ADVOCATE. For Defendant/Respondent : MR.BARIN BANERJEE,ADVOCATE MR.F.HAQUE,ADVOCATE The Court : It is submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner that pursuant to the order dated 10th April, 2012 bills from 1st Quarter 2006 till 10th April,2012 and also bills prior to 1st Quarter 2006 have been furnished. It is submitted that there are obvious mistakes, as evident from the copies of the bills, as according to him there are mistakes in number of quarters and rebate of 5% has not been granted. On a query it has been submitted that no payment of municipal dues has been made after 2006. Mr.Banerjee, learned advocate for the Kolkata Municipal Corporation sub...
Smt. Pampa Barat Vs. Khaitan Land Limited and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-2012
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE APOT NO.439 OF 201.GA NO.3229 OF 201.AP NO.170 OF 200.SMT. PAMPA BARAT Versus KHAITAN LAND LIMITED & ANR. ---APOT NO.471 OF 201.GA NO.3004 OF 201.AP NO.170 OF 200.DEBASHISH BARAT & ANR. -VSKHAITAN LAND LIMITED & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASIM KR. MONDAL Date :4. h May, 2012. The Court : All the learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that once the matter had been settled and the terms of settlement had been filed before the Honble FiRs.Court which was accepted and thereafter the Court disposed of the matter in terms of the terms of settlement. This would be reflected in the order dated March 1, 2012. According to Mr.Kar, the parties have acted upon in terms of the terms of settlement. Therefore, in view of this position, we think that this matter no longer survives. When this appeal was filed, the matter was very much alive before the learned Tr...
Om Prakash Mohta and ors. Vs. Raj Kumar Daga and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-2012
ORDER SHEET CSOS No.1 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE OM PRAKASH MOHTA & ORS.Versus RAJ KUMAR DAGA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :4. h May, 2012. Mr.Jishnu Saha, Mr.Sakya Sen, Mr.Asish Mukherjee, Adversus for the plaintiffs Mr.Gautam Chakraborty(Jr.).Ms.Soma Bera, Adversus for the defendants The Court : All questions regarding the maintainability of the Chapter XIII suit, by way of an originating summons, are kept open. Mr.Saha prays for some urgent reliefs. Mr.Harish Tandon as His Lordship was before his appointment as a Judge was receiver over the trust property under various orders of this Court in FMA 49.of 2006 connected with W.P.4076 (W) of 2010. His duties were (1) to collect rent from the tenants of the trust property; (2) to defray the expenses of the trust; and (3) to operate the bank account of the trust. At the time of elevation of Mr.Harish Tandon to the Bench, by an order of this Court dated 9th ...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »