Kolkata Court April 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mamata Debnath and Another Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-03-2012
Jyotirmay Bhattacharya, J. The petitioners were appointed as Veterinary Compounders on regular basis in October, 1999 on an initial pay of Rs.2650/- in the scale of pay of Rs.2650-4000 and other allowances as admissible as per rules under the Directorate of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services of A and N Islands.Both of them were directly recruited in the said post which was Group-D non-gazetted, non-ministerial post. As per the recruitment rules, 75% of the vacancies in the said post are to be filled up by promotion from the cadre post of Veterinary Stockman and Laboratory Attendant having three years’ service in the cadre post and remaining 25% of the vacancies are to be filled up by direct recruitment. The educational qualification prescribed for the direct recruit, is higher than the educational qualification which is prescribed for the promotee under the Recruitment Rules. For the direct recruitment the candidates must have passed 12th standard. Candidates in the cadre p...
Manish Kumar Bhattacharyya and Others Vs. Sanhita Bhattacharyya and An ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-03-2012
Prasenjit Mandal, J. This criminal revision is directed against the order dated March 14, 2011 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 5th Court, Serampore in C.R. No.673 of 2010 thereby granting an interim order of right of residence of the petitioner/opposite party therein in the dwelling house situated at 95/A Patuapara Lane under P.S. Serampore, Dist. Hooghly under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The complainant/opposite party herein instituted a proceeding under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, 5th Court, Serampore claiming relief of right of residence along with her husband and child at her matrimonial home, that is, at 95/A Patuapara Lane under P.S. Serampore, Dist. Hooghly. She moved an application under Section 23 of the said 2005 Act for interim relief and that prayer was granted by the impugned order. Being aggrieved, the opposite parties/petitioners herein hav...
Arjun Agarwal and Others Vs. Ramesh Agarwal
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-02-2012
Kanchan Chakraborty, J. 1) The C.R.R. 2109 of 2005 is pertaining to the C.R. Case No. 28 of 2004 under Section 500/34 of the Indian Penal Code wherein the petitioners Arjun Kumar Agarwal, Binod Agarwal and Kamal Kumar Agarwal are made accused. The petition of complaint against them was lodged by Ramesh Agarwal, the opposite party. The petitioners/accused prayed for quashing of the proceeding on manifold grounds. 2) The C.R.R. 1894 of 2006 is pertaining to the C.R. Case No. 15 of 2005 wherein the petitioner Ramesh Agarwal is made an accused by the complainant P.C. Agarwal under Section 500/34 of the IPC. The petitioner Ramesh Agarwal prayed for quashing of the proceeding on manifold grounds. 3) Since both the cases are closely related to each other and have arisen out of same factual background, both are disposed of by this common order. 4) The C.R. Case No. 28 of 2004 was initiated by Ramesh Agarwal against as many as 11 persons out of which three accused persons have taken out this ap...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›