Kolkata Court March 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Aditya Ghosh and Others Vs. University of Calcutta and Others
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-07-2012
Tapen Sen, J. In Re: W.P. No. 22032 (W) of 2011 with CAN No. 657 of 2012 with CAN No. 1472 of 2012 This Writ Petition has been filed by 15 Students of the K. K. Das College expressing their willingness to contest the students election. The College had issued an election Notice on 14.12.2011 indicating the date of the election, the date of issuance of nomination papers, the date of submission of nomination papers and the date of publication of the final list of valid candidates. According to the Petitioners, the election programme was as per the provisions of the Calcutta University Rules and Regulations. 2. It is stated in Paragraph 5 that on 19.12.2011, the Petitioners wanted to obtain nomination papers but followers of the Trinamool Congress (a Political Party) and other anti-social elements prevented them and blocked all roads leading to the College. It has been stated that the Petitioners attempted to enter the College and contacted the College authorities over telephone but in vai...
Union of India Vs. Pratima Rani Manna and Another
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-07-2012
Dr. Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri, J. This appeal has been preferred by the Union of India against the judgement and order dated 23rd July, 2010 passed by Hon’ble Single Judge in an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India being W.P. No. 1023 of 1998 filed by Smt. Pratima Rani Manna. The writ petitioner Pratima Rani Manna in an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before Hon’ble Single Judge stated that her husband late Chunilal Manna suffered imprisonment for a period of not less than six months during freedom movement. He applied for granting freedom fighter pension as per Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980 enclosing all documents. He was sanctioned provisional pension of Rs.200/- vide memo no. 33/1/Gen-1/74-FFEZ dated 26.10.1974. He used to draw pension till the date of notice of suspension dated 5th October, 1982 issued by the Secretary, Government of India on the ground that he was not eligible for the grant of pension unde...
Shree Gouri Shankar Jute Mills Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-07-2012
Soumitra Pal, J. In the writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order of suspension dated 7th December, 2010 passed under sub-section (4) of Section 11 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (for short the “Act”) by the Joint Director of Foreign Trade, the respondent no.3, suspending the Importer - Exporter Code (“Code” for short) of the petitioner. The facts which are relevant for the purpose of adjudication are that by an order dated 22nd November, 2006 the Deputy Director General of Foreign Trade, the respondent no. 4, after issuing show-cause notice to which the petitioner had replied and was not found to be satisfactory, and after giving an opportunity of personal hearing, to which the petitioner did not respond, had passed an order under section 9 (4) and section 11 (2) of the Act and under Rule 10(b) of the Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, cancelling the licence of the petitioner and directing payment of customs d...
Dr. Narendra Kohli Vs. Ratan Marothia
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-06-2012
This is an application of Ratan Marothia (the petitioner, in short), who is contesting a probate proceedings in this Court as the defendant, primarily for appointment of an advocate of this Court as Commissioner for examination of one Mrs. Jacqueline Wilson and her son, Mr. Anthony Wilson also known as Toby Wilson (Toby, in short), or rather for recording the evidence of the said Wilsons’ at their residence in Spain on “such terms and conditions as this” Court may deem fit and proper. The other incidental or consequential prayer contained in Prayer (b) of the petition need not be quoted in detail. The case of the petitioner as made out in his petition appears to be that the respondent herein, Dr. Narendra Kholi (respondent, in short) being the executor of a Will of one Helen Wilson, since deceased, initiated the above probate proceedings in the City Civil Court at Calcutta for obtaining probate of the Will of Helen Wilson, the testatrix, which as I have said above, wa...
Dr. Apurba Chowdhury Vs. Dr. Shampa Maitra (Chowdhury)
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-06-2012
ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE. J. MARRIAGE Both the parties are medical practitioners. They got married on August 11, 1995 according to Hindu Rites. The respondent/wife was a resident of Salt Lake whereas the appellant/husband stayed at Thakurpukur in the South West suburb of the city. On August 18, 1998 Atrye was born out of the wedlock. When we heard the appeal she was aged about fourteen years and studying in school. SWEET MEMMORIES In the plaint the husband made several allegations touching the behavioural and temperamental discord between them. However the evidence would depict otherwise. We get a brief idea of the matrimonial time between the couple from their contemporaneous letters and/or other documentary evidence. In June 1999 the husband wrote to the wife a long letter from his work place which was at the remote area of Bihar. It was rather an attempt to cherish sweet memories whenever they were together at Calcutta. The husband was morose and felt deserted and at the same time accep...
Magma Fincorp Limited Vs. Abhjit Betal and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-06-2012
ORDER SHEET EC No.386 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE MAGMA FINCORP LIMITED Versus ABHJIT BETAL & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE Date :6. h March, 2012. Appearance: Mr.Moinak Bose, Adv.The Court : By an order dated January 17, 2012 His Lordship the Honble Justice I.P.Mukerji appointed Ms.Subra Bhowmick an Advocate as Receiver with a direction upon her to initiate the process of sale of the vehicle in question, by public notice or private treaty, after notifying the judgement debtORS.His Lordship directed that offers be invited, but not accepted for the time being. The application was directed to be listed on February 14, 2012. It appears that Ms.Subhra Bhowmick who had been appointed Receiver could not be located. In the circumstances, His Lordship the Honble Justice I.P.Mukerji passed an order dated February 2, 2012 appointing Mr.Dipak Kumar Das, Advocate, as Receiver in place of Ms.Subhra Bhowmick on the same terms and conditions. Advertisements ...
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-06-2012
1 G.A.No.19 of 2012 G.A.No.3310 of 2011 EOPLA No.2 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA TESTAMENTARY INTESTATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Honble Mr.Justice Maharaj Sinha. DR. NARENDRA KOHLI -VRATAN MAROTHIA For the Petitioner: Mr.Pradip Dutta, Sr.Adv.Mr.Sanjib Dawn, Adv.For the Respondent: Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Utpal Bose, Adv., Dhruba Ghosh, Adv., P.K.Bagaria, Adv., J. Chatterjee, Adv.Judgement on:06. 03-2012. This is an application of Ratan Marothia (the petitioner, in short).who is contesting a probate proceedings in this Court as the defendant, primarily for appointment of an advocate of this Court as Commissioner for examination of one MRS.Jacqueline Wilson and her son, Mr.Anthony Wilson also known as Toby Wilson (Toby, in short).or rather for recording the evidence of the said Wilsons at their residence in Spain on such terms and conditions as this. Court may deem fit and proper. The other incidental or consequential prayer contained in Prayer (b) of the petition need not be ...
Nripendra Kristo Dutt and anr. Vs. Jogendra Kristo Dutt and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-06-2012
APOT NO.108 OF 201.GA No.620 of 2012 GA No.2578 of 2011 GA No.2447 of 2011 GA No.2442 of 2011 PARTITION & ADMINISTRATION SUIT C.S.No.592 of 1975 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE NRIPENDRA KRISTO DUTT & ANR. Versus JOGENDRA KRISTO DUTT & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI Date :6. h March, 2012. Mr.Sakkya Sen, Adv..for appellant/petitioner Mr.Hirak Kumar Mitra, Sr.Adv.Mr.Samir Mukherjee, Adv..for plaintiff/respondent Mr.Ahin Chowdhury, Sr.Adv.Mr.Sukumar Bhattacharyya, Adv.Ms.Lopita Banerjee, Adv..for respondent nos.3(a),3(b) & 3 (C).The Court :- By consent of the parties the application is treated as on days list as Application New.Service of Notice-of-Motion is waived. The application is disposed of finally without calling for any affidavit from the respondents. Hearing of the appeal is expedited. Mr.Sens client will file informal paper book enclosing all the papers used before the learned Tr...
Shree Bahubali International Ltd. Vs. Sarita Sethi
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-06-2012
APOT NO.105 OF 201.ACO NO.42 of 2012 CP No.403 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SHREE BAHUBALI INTERNATIONAL LTD.Versus SARITA SETHI BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA The Hon'ble JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI Date :6. h March, 2012. Mr.Amitesh Banerjee, Adv.for appellant. Ms.Prabha Jain, Adv...for respondent/petitioning creditor. The Court :- There has been a typographical error in the prayer portion. Leave is accordingly given to rectify the same. Subject to correction as above there will be an order in terms of prayer (a).dispensing with all the formalities. We treat this application as on days list as the learned Counsel for the respondent and learned Counsel for petitioning creditor waive the service of Notice-of-Appeal. However, the parties have agreed that appeal should be disposed of finally today as our Judgment and order are not on consent of the parties but that is the Courts order. This appeal is directed against the ...
Soumen Kumar Choudhury Vs. the State of West Bengal and Others
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-06-2012
GA No.270 of 2012 GA No.269 of 2012 with WP No.1290 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Soumen Kumar Choudhury Versus The State of West Bengal & Others Before: The Honble Justice Jyotirmay Bhattacharya Date:6. h March 2012 Appearance: Mr.S.S. Arefin, Advocate appears for the petitioner Mr.Sadananda Ganguly, Advocate Ms.Reshmi Ghosh, Advocate appear for the State GA No.269 of 2012 This application for condonation of delay is taken up for hearing with the consent of the parties by treating the same as on days list. In this application the petitioner has prayed for condonation of 195 days delay in filing the review application. After considering the reasons for delay in filing the review application as disclosed by the petitioner in this application this Court is of the view that delay in filing the review application has sufficiently been explained by the petitioner in this application. Accordingly delay in filing the review application is...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »