Kolkata Court December 2012 Judgments
Gujarat Composite Ltd. Vs. Passary Finance and Investments Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
ORDER SHEET ACO NO.250 OF 201.APOT NO.573 OF 201.CP NO.146 OF 201.IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE GUJARAT COMPOSITE LTD.Versus PASSARY FINANCE & INVESTMENTS PVT.LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASHIM KUMAR BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHUKLA KABIR (SINHA) Date :20. h December, 2012. Mr.Shaunak Mitra, Adv., Mr.Shibratan Kakrania, Adv., Mr.Sanjeeb Seni, Adv., for the appellant. Mr.Susanta Dutta, Adv., Mr.Bimalendu Das, Adv., for the respondent. The Court : There will be an order in terms of prayer (a) of the application. We have heard Mr.Shaunak Mitra, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr.Susanta Dutta, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent. We must appreciate, Mr.Mitra leaves no stone unturned to impress us in this appeal with all his eloquence. He claiMs.the appellant invested a sum of Rs.10 lakhs. Whatever payments the appellant received have been adjusted as against interest. Even after payment of Rs.12 lakhs and odd as adm...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Radha Bagri and anr. Vs. Ghanshyam Bagri and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
ORDER SHEET GA No.2409 of 2012 With APO NO.173 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction SMT. RADHA BAGRI & ANR. Versus GHANSHYAM BAGRI & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE BANERJEE The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHUKLA KABIR (SINHA) Date :20. h December, 2012. Mr.Amitava Das, Mr.Tapan Sil for the applicant. Mr.A.Lahiri for appellant Radha Bagri. Mr.Gour Roy Chowdhury, Mr.S.N.Dutta for respondent no.3 Mt.Mainak Bose for respondent no.5 & 6. Mr.Indranath Mukherjee, Mr.D.K. Bhattacharjee for executor. Mr.P.C.Pal Chowdhury for Administrator. The Court : This litigation would relate to the issue of partition of the properties belonging to the Bagree family in which one Gopal Das Bagree was a party. He died. The dispute started as to the representation of Gopal Das Bagree estate. The learned Single Judge appointed Mr.Samrat Sen, an Advocate of this Court as Administrator to represent the estate of late Gopal Das Bagree. Earlier one Goura Devi Bagree claiming to be the wife of lat...
Tag this Judgment!Edward Food Research and Analysis Centre Ltd and anr Vs. the Kolkata M ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE WP 104.OF 201.GA 165.of 2012 EDWARD FOOD RESEARCH & ANALYSIS CENTRE LTD & ANR Versus THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE NADIRA PATHERYA Date :20. h December, 2012. Mr.Saktinath Mukherjee, Sr.Adv.Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Adv.Mr.Amiya Naraya Mukherjee, Adv.for petitioneRs.The Court :- By this writ petition the petitioners seek deletion of the word T. in respect of premises 20 and 21, Gopal Chandra Mukherjee Road, Cossipore, Kolkata. The case of the petitioners is that from the bill raised on the petitioners by the Kolkata Municipal Corporation in 2012 the petitioner for the fiRs.time came to knot that he had been declared as a Thika Tenant under the Kolkata Thika Tenancy Act and that the owner of the said premises was the State of West Bengal. The petitioner was the owner of only the structure. On receipt of the said bill information was sought under the 2005 Act and the pe...
Tag this Judgment!Nandini Holdings and Securities Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pushpesh Kr Baid and ors ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
ORDER SHEET GA NO.1744 OF 201.WITH EOS NO.5 OF 201.IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE NANDINI HOLDINGS & SECURITIES PVT.LTD.Versus PUSHPESH KR BAID & ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :20. h December, 2012. Mr.P.Chatterjee, Mr.R.Deb, senior advocateappear. Mr.Pramit Kr. Roy, Mr.A.Kanodiaappear. Mr.R.Banerjee, Mr.K.K.thakkarappear. Mr.D.MukherjeeappeaRs.The Court : It appears from the report of the Deputy Commissioner of Police [Special]., Detective Department, Kolkata dated 10th December, 2012 that the title deeds in the possession of the plaintiff are genuine. Furthermore, the title deeds in possession of Dena Bank in furtherance of an alleged equitable mortgage are fake or forged. The foundation of the claim of the bank as equitable mortgagee rests on a mortgage created by deposit of original title deeds. That foundation is shaken by the report. Therefore, the claim of the plaintiff that they are genuine buyers of the subje...
Tag this Judgment!Sandip Murarka and ors..Petitioners Vs. the Board of Trustees for the ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
ORDER SHEET W.P.No.1028 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SANDIP MURARKA & ORS Versus .Petitioners THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF CALCUTTA & ORS .Respondents BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA Date :20. h December, 2012. Appearance: Mr.Shaktinath Mukherjee, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Satpangsu Basu, Sr.Advocate for the Petitioners Mr.Jaydip Kar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.D.R.Mukherjee, Advocate for the Respondent No.1 The Court : The petitioners had engaged the respondent no.4 for transportation of goods. The respondent No.4, it is alleged, stored the goods in the godowns which had been leased out by the lessor (the Port Trust) in favour of the respondent no.3. In a proceeding under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, an order of eviction has been passed against the respondent no.3. Soon thereafter, the Port Trust sealed the godowns on 2nd July, 2012. It is claimed in the writ petition that since the g...
Tag this Judgment!Downtown Temptations Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Apeejay Finance Group Limited
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
AP No.170 of 2005 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE DOWNTOWN TEMPTATIONS PVT.LTD.-VersusAPEEJAY FINANCE GROUP LIMITED Appearance: Mr.Debojyoti Dutta, Adv.Ms.Anisha Surana, Adv...for the petitioner. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : December 20, 2012. The Court : None appears on behalf of the fiRs.respondent even at the second call. The name of the second respondent should be deleted from the cause title since the second respondent was the arbitrator and an unnecessary party to the present proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. However, one can sympathise with the petitioner for clubbing the finance company and the arbitrator on the same side. The marginal delay on the part of the petitioner to file the present petition beyond the period of three months, but within the next period of thirty days, is condoned on the grounds that have been indicated in the petition and have been orally urg...
Tag this Judgment!Surya Alloy Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
ORDER SHEET TA NO.159 OF 201.WITH T NO.197 OF 201.IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SURYA ALLOY INDUSTRIES LTD.Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :20. h December, 2012. Mr.J.Saha, Mr.D.Ghosh, Mr.P.Mukherjeeappear. Mr.L.K.Chatterjee, Ms.A.Banerjeeappear. The Court : On 14th August, 2012 in an application with more or less identical facts, TA No.82 of 2012 with CS no.263 of 2012 [Eastern Track Udyog PVT.LTD.versus Union of India & Ors.].I passed the following order : The Court : In TA No.77 of 2012, CS No.250 of 2012 [Fair Deal Engineering and Bodybuilding Co.PVT.LTD.versus Union of India & ors.].I had passed the following interim order on 31st July, 2012 : This is an interim application in aid of the above suit. The plaintiff is aggrieved by two notices issued by the Research Designs and Standards Organisation (RDSO).a wing of the Ministry of Railways. Both these notices are dated 11th July, 2012 being ...
Tag this Judgment!Magma Fincorp Ltd. Vs. Coastal Projects Ltd and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP No.1026 No.1027 No.1028 No.1029 No.1030 No.1031 No.1032 No.1033 No.1034 No.1035 No.1036 No.1037 No.1038 No.1039 No.1040 No.1041 No.1042 No.1043 No.1044 No.1047 No.1048 No.1049 No.1050 No.1051 No.1052 No.1053 No.1054 No.1055 No.1056 No.1057 No.1058 of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of of o2012. 2012012. 2012012. 2012012. 2012012. 2012012. 2012012. 2012012. 2012012. 2012012. 2012 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE MAGMA FINCORP LTD.Versus COASTAL PROJECTS LTD & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date :20. h December, 2012. Appearance: Mr.Pratap Chatterjee, Sr.Adv.Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Adv.Mr.Samrat Sen, Adv.Mr.P.Sinha, Adv.Mr.K.K. Pandey, Adv.The Court : The parties are common in all these 31 matteRs.The fiRs.respondent in each case is the principal debtor and the second respondent is t...
Tag this Judgment!Kartick Ch Shaw Estate Between Narayan Ch Shaw Vs. Land Acquisition Co ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
ORDER SHEET G.A.No.2524 of 2012 CSOS 14 of 1995 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE In the matter of: KARTICK CH SHAW ESTATE BETWEEN NARAYAN CH SHAW Versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, KOLKATA & ORS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE I.P.MUKERJ.Date :20. h December, 2012. For Petitioner: Mr.S.P.Sarkar,Sr.Advocate Mrs.S.Mukherjee,Advocate Mr.A.Chatterjee,Advocate For Respondent : Mr.Dhruba Ghosh,Advocate The Court : This is an application by a Private Limited Company, S.R.Enclave PVT.LTD.They say that they have purchased a 1/3rd share in the property numbered as premises No.104 Dr.Meghnath Saha Sarani (formerly known as Southern Avenue.) from one Smt.Shakuntala Bera (Shaw).The problem they face arose in this way, as submitted. In 2009 they instituted a title suit (Title Suit No.2233 of 2009) before the 9th Civil Judge at Alipore for partition of this property. It was submitted by Mr.Sarkar, learned Senior Advocate that in the title suit no written st...
Tag this Judgment!……plaintiff/Petitioner Vs. Chatterjee Petrochem
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-20-2012
1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction GA 1191/2012 WITH CS 152/2012 GA 1598/2012 GA 1603/2012 In the matter of: HALDIA PETROCHEMICALS LTD. Plaintiff/Petitioner Vs. CHATTERJEE PETROCHEM (MAURITIUS) COMPANY & ORS. Defendants/Respondents For the Plaintiff For the Defendant No.1& 2 For the Defendant No.3 For the respondent No.4 For the respondents No.5 and 6 : Mr. Pratap Chatterjee, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jishnu Saha Mr. Ranjan Bachwat Mr. Aditya Gandia Mr. Sayan Roy Chaudhury, Advocates. : Mr. Sudipto Sarkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Siddhartha Mitra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Moushumi Bhattacharya, Mr. S. Datta, Advocates : Mr. S.N. Mookherjee, Senior Advocate with Mr. S. Prasad, Mr. Parth Basu, Advocates. : Mr. S.B. Mookherjee, Senior Advocate with Mr. S. Datta, Advocate : Mr. S.K. Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Debangshu Basak Mr. Sanjay Ginodia, Mr. Mayank Mishra, Mr. Ravi Kapur, Mr. Amal Gupta, Ms. Preeta Chaudhary, Advocates. Heard on :29. 06.12, 02....
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »