Kolkata Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Port of Calcutta and ors. Vs. Smt. Shibani Das
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-03-2012
ORDER SHEET APO No.252 of 2012 WP No.175 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF CALCUTTA & ORS.Versus SMT. SHIBANI DAS BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PRATAP KUMAR RAY The Hon'ble JUSTICE SUBAL BAIDYA Date :3. d October, 2012. Mr.Arunabha Ghosh, Mr.Sujata Mukherjee, Adversus for the appellants Mr.Hiranmoy Bhattacharya, Mr.Mrinal Kanti Ghosh, Adversus for the respondent Pratap Kumar Ray, J. : Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. Assailing the judgment and order dated 19th January, 2012 passed by the learned Trial Judge in W.P.No.179 of 2009, this appeal has been preferred. In the writ application, the question cropped up about eligibility of family pension by the petitioner who admittedly became wife of retired employee after superannuation of the concerned employee from the Kolkata Port Trust as per earlier regulation of the Kolkata Port Trust which not has been declared as ultra vires by the ...
M/S. Seven Hill Bytes Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. the State of West Beng ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
A question has cropped up in this proceeding as to whether the terms and conditions of the contract can be modified unilaterally by one of such contracting parties without the consent of the other contracting party? Another question has also cropped up in this proceeding as to whether the Governor can issue any notification on a subject on which the State Legislature is incompetent to legislate? The other question which has cropped in this proceeding is as to whether the applications for change of use of the land which were filed before the notification dated 8th December, 2011 was issued, can be governed by the provisions contained in the said notification dated 8th December, 2011? These are the three questions which this Court is required to answer in this writ proceeding. The basic facts which are relevant for the present purpose may be summarized hereunder as follows: a) A lease deed was executed between the Governor of the State of West Bengal and M/s. Resin and Allied Products on...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›